Literature DB >> 26200681

Association of Comorbidity with Anastomotic Leak, 30-day Mortality, and Length of Stay in Elective Surgery for Colonic Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Peter-Martin Krarup1, Andreas Nordholm-Carstensen, Lars Nannestad Jorgensen, Henrik Harling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comorbidity has a negative influence on the long-term prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer, whereas its impact on the postoperative course is less clear.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of comorbidity on anastomotic leak and short-term outcomes after resection for colonic cancer.
DESIGN: This is a retrospective nationwide cohort study
SETTING: : Data were obtained from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group and the National Patient Registry. PATIENTS: Patients with colonic cancer undergoing elective resection between 2001 and 2008 were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the ability of comorbidity to predict anastomotic leak. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and length of stay. Comorbidity was assessed by the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics curves were used to adjust for confounding.
RESULTS: The rate of anastomotic leak was 535/8597 (6.2%). The mean (95% CI) Charlson score was 0.83 (0.72-0.94) and 0.63 (0.61-0.66) for patients with and without anastomotic leak, p < 0.001. The Charlson score, as assessed in the multivariable analysis (adjusted OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.99-1.15; p = 0.077) and by receiver operating characteristics curves (area under the curve = 0.548), failed to predict anastomotic leak. Thirty-day mortality was 425/8587 (4.9%). In patients with anastomotic leakage, a Charlson score of ≥ 2 was associated with increased mortality in comparison with a Charlson score of <2 (adjusted HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.00-2.51; p = 0.047). Mean length of stay was 8.7 days (95% CI, 8.4-9.2 days) for patients without an anastomotic leak in comparison with 23.3 days (95% CI, 21.5-25.1 days) for patients with anastomotic leak and 25.5 days (95% CI, 21.7-29.3 days) in patients with anastomotic leak and a Charlson score of >2, p < 0.001. LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by the accuracy of the coding used to generate the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the retrospective study design.
CONCLUSION: Comorbidity failed to predict anastomotic leak, but it was associated with an inferior short-term outcome in patients with this surgical complication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26200681     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  16 in total

1.  The effect of gender on early colonic anastomotic wound healing.

Authors:  Marie Kjaer; Hrefna Kristjánsdóttir; Line Andersen; Anne-Marie Heegaard; Magnus S Ågren; Lars N Jorgensen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  [Quality indicators for colon cancer surgery : Evidence-based development of a set of indicators for the outcome quality].

Authors:  J Hardt; H-J Buhr; C Klinger; S Benz; K Ludwig; J Kalff; S Post
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Comorbidity and the risk of anastomotic leak in Chinese patients with colorectal cancer undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Yaohua Tian; Beibei Xu; Guopei Yu; Yan Li; Hui Liu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage after right hemicolectomy.

Authors:  Mikkel Jessen; Malene Nerstrøm; Therese Emilie Wilbek; Søren Roepstorff; Morten S Rasmussen; Peter-Martin Krarup
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  The fate of preserved sphincter in rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Ri Na Yoo; Gun Kim; Bong-Hyeon Kye; Hyeon-Min Cho; HyungJin Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Risk factors affecting hospital stay among patients undergoing colon cancer surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Miren Orive; Urko Aguirre; Nerea Gonzalez; Santiago Lázaro; Maximino Redondo; Marisa Bare; Rocío Anula; Eduardo Briones; Antonio Escobar; Cristina Sarasqueta; Susana Garcia-Gutierrez; José M Quintana
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  The impact of an ostomy on older colorectal cancer patients: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  N M Verweij; M E Hamaker; D D E Zimmerman; Y T van Loon; F van den Bos; A Pronk; I H M Borel Rinkes; A H W Schiphorst
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Decreased risk of surgery for small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery compared with open surgery: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Kristian Kiim Jensen; Peter Andersen; Rune Erichsen; Thomas Scheike; Lene Hjerrild Iversen; Peter-Martin Krarup
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Association of Low Muscle Mass and Low Muscle Radiodensity With Morbidity and Mortality for Colon Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Jingjie Xiao; Bette J Caan; Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Peter D Peng; Vickie E Baracos; Valerie S Lee; Sora Ely; Rebecca C Gologorsky; Erin Weltzien; Candyce H Kroenke; Marilyn L Kwan; Stacey E Alexeeff; Adrienne L Castillo; Carla M Prado
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  Combined repeat laparoscopy and transanal endolumenal repair (hybrid approach) in the early management of postoperative colorectal anastomotic leaks: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  William Tzu-Liang Chen; Saurabh Bansal; Tao-Wei Ke; Sheng-Chi Chang; Yu-Chun Huang; Takashi Kato; Hwei-Ming Wang; Abe Fingerhut
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.