Literature DB >> 20395841

Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer.

Bogdan C Paun1, Scott Cassie, Anthony R MacLean, Elijah Dixon, W Donald Buie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review was designed to determine postoperative complication rates of radical surgery for rectal cancer (abdominal perineal resection and anterior resection). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lack of accepted complication rates for rectal cancer surgery may hinder quality improvement efforts and may impede the conception of future studies because of uncertainty regarding the expected event rates.
METHODS: All prospective studies of rectal cancer receiving radical surgery published between 1990 and August 2008 were obtained by searching Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, as well as ASCO GI, CAGS, and ASCRS meeting abstracts between 2004 and 2008. There was no language restriction. The outcomes extracted were anastomotic leak, pelvic sepsis, postoperative death, wound infection, and fecal incontinence. Summary complication rates were obtained using a random effects model; the Z-test was used to test for study heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Fifty-three prospective cohort studies and 45 randomized controlled studies with 36,315 patients (24,845 patients had an anastomosis) were eligible for inclusion. Most of the studies found were based in continental Europe (58%), followed by Asia (25%), United Kingdom (10%), North America (5%), and Australia/New Zealand. The anastomotic leak rate, reported in 84 studies, was 11% (95% CI: 10, 12); the pelvic sepsis rate, in 29 studies, was 12% (9, 16); the postoperative death rate, in 75 studies, was 2% (2, 3); and the wound infection rate, in 50 studies, was 7% (5, 8). Fecal incontinence rates were reported in too few studies and so heterogeneously that numerical summarization was inappropriate. Year of publication, use of preoperative radiation, use of laparoscopy, and use of protecting stoma were not significant variables, but average age, median tumor height, and method of detection (clinical vs. radiologic) showed significance to explain heterogeneity in anastomotic leak rates. Year of publication, study origin, average age, and use of laparoscopy were significant, but median tumor height and preoperative radiation use were not significant in explaining heterogeneity among observed postoperative death rates. With multivariable analysis, only average age for anastomotic leak and year of publication for postoperative death remained significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Benchmark complication rates for radical rectal cancer surgery were obtained for use in sample size calculations in future studies and for quality control purposes. Postoperative death rates showed improvement in recent years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20395841     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181dae4ed

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  133 in total

1.  Readmission Adversely Affects Survival in Surgical Rectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Sophia Y Chen; Miloslawa Stem; Susan L Gearhart; Bashar Safar; Sandy H Fang; Nilofer S Azad; Adrian G Murphy; Amol K Narang; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jonathan E Efron
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Ghost ileostomy after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Nino Gullà; Stefano Trastulli; Carlo Boselli; Roberto Cirocchi; Davide Cavaliere; Giorgio Maria Verdecchia; Umberto Morelli; Daniele Gentile; Emilio Eugeni; Daniela Caracappa; Chiara Listorti; Francesco Sciannameo; Giuseppe Noya
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Multi-drug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infection in surgical patients hospitalized in the ICU: a cohort study.

Authors:  V G Alexiou; A Michalopoulos; G C Makris; G Peppas; G Samonis; M E Falagas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  A hundred patients with vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap for pelvic reconstruction after total pelvic exenteration.

Authors:  R E Horch; W Hohenberger; A Eweida; U Kneser; K Weber; A Arkudas; S Merkel; J Göhl; J P Beier
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Contrast medium at the site of the anastomosis is crucial in detecting anastomotic leakage with CT imaging after colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Astrid A M Huiberts; Lea M Dijksman; Simone A Boer; Eveline J T Krul; Jan Peringa; Sandra C Donkervoort
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Does ghost ileostomy have a role in the laparoscopic rectal surgery era? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Francesco Saverio Mari; Tatiana Di Cesare; Luciano Novi; Marcello Gasparrini; Giammauro Berardi; Giovanni Guglielmo Laracca; Andrea Liverani; Antonio Brescia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Predictive Factors for Small Intestinal and Colonic Anastomotic Leak: a Multivariate Analysis.

Authors:  Ahmad Sakr; Sameh Hany Emile; Emad Abdallah; Waleed Thabet; Wael Khafagy
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 0.656

8.  Defunctioning loop ileostomy for rectal anastomoses: predictors of stoma outlet obstruction.

Authors:  Koichi Tamura; Kenji Matsuda; Shozo Yokoyama; Hiromitsu Iwamoto; Yuki Mizumoto; Daisuke Murakami; Yuki Nakamura; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Double-layered Nanofibrous Patch for Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage and Peritoneal Adhesions, Experimental Study.

Authors:  Jachym Rosendorf; Marketa Klicova; Lenka Cervenkova; Richard Palek; Jana Horakova; Andrea Klapstova; Petr Hosek; Vladimira Moulisova; Lukas Bednar; Vaclav Tegl; Ondrej Brzon; Zbynek Tonar; Vladislav Treska; David Lukas; Vaclav Liska
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  The association of hospital volume with rectal cancer surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Jeong-Heum Baek; Abdulhadi Alrubaie; Eduardo A Guzman; Sun Keun Choi; Casandra Anderson; Steven Mills; Joseph Carmichael; Andy Dagis; Dajun Qian; Joseph Kim; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Michael J Stamos; Lisa Bening; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.