Literature DB >> 29494124

Role of Surface Tension in Gas Nanobubble Stability Under Ultrasound.

Christopher Hernandez, Lenitza Nieves, Al C de Leon, Rigoberto Advincula, Agata A Exner.   

Abstract

Shell-stabilized gas nanobubbles have recently captured the interest of the research community for their potential application as ultrasound contrast agents for molecular imaging and therapy of cancer. However, the very existence of submicron gas bubbles (especially uncoated bubbles) has been a subject of controversy in part due to their predicted Laplace overpressure reaching several atmospheres, making them supposedly thermodynamically unstable. In addition, the backscatter resulting from ultrasound interactions with nanoparticles is not predicted to be readily detectable at clinically relevant frequencies. Despite this, a number of recent reports have successfully investigated the presence and applications of nanobubbles for ultrasound imaging. The mechanism behind these observations remains unclear but is thought to be, in part, influenced heavily by the biophysical properties of the bubble-stabilizing shell. In this study, we investigated the effects of incorporating the triblock copolymer surfactant, Pluronic, into the lipid monolayer of nanobubbles. The impact of shell composition on membrane equilibrium surface tension was investigated using optical tensiometry, using both pendant drop and rising drop principles. However, these techniques proved to be insufficient in explaining the observed behavior and stability of nanobubbles under ultrasound. Additionally, we sought to investigate changes in membrane surface tension (surface pressure) at different degrees of compression (analogous to the bubble oscillations in the ultrasound field) via Langmuir-Blodgett experiments. Results from this study show a significant decrease ( p < 0.0001) in the nanobubble equilibrium surface tension through the incorporation of Pluronic L10, especially at a ratio of 0.2, where this value decreased by 28%. However, this reduction in surface pressure was seen only for specific compositions and varied with monolayer structure (crystalline phase or liquid-crystalline packing). These results indicate a potential for optimization wherein surface pressure can be maximized for both contraction and expansion phases with the proper lipid to Pluronic balance and microstructure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Langmuir−Blodgett; microbubbles; nanobubbles; pendant drop; surface tension; ultrasound contrast agents

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29494124      PMCID: PMC8994853          DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b19755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces        ISSN: 1944-8244            Impact factor:   9.229


  48 in total

1.  On-chip preparation of nanoscale contrast agents towards high-resolution ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Sally A Peyman; James R McLaughlan; Radwa H Abou-Saleh; Gemma Marston; Benjamin R G Johnson; Steven Freear; P Louise Coletta; Alexander F Markham; Stephen D Evans
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  How does pulmonary surfactant reduce surface tension to very low values?

Authors:  Yi Y Zuo; Fred Possmayer
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2007-02-15

3.  Pinning and gas oversaturation imply stable single surface nanobubbles.

Authors:  Detlef Lohse; Xuehua Zhang
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2015-03-27

Review 4.  Progress on the Surface Nanobubble Story: What is in the bubble? Why does it exist?

Authors:  Hong Peng; Greg R Birkett; Anh V Nguyen
Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 12.984

Review 5.  Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Jinjun Shi; Philip W Kantoff; Richard Wooster; Omid C Farokhzad
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Physical correlates of the ultrasonic reflectivity of lipid dispersions suitable as diagnostic contrast agents.

Authors:  Shao-Ling Huang; Andrew J Hamilton; Edwin Pozharski; Ashwin Nagaraj; Melvin E Klegerman; David D McPherson; Robert C MacDonald
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Improving performance of nanoscale ultrasound contrast agents using N,N-diethylacrylamide stabilization.

Authors:  Reshani H Perera; Hanping Wu; Pubudu Peiris; Christopher Hernandez; Alan Burke; Helen Zhang; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 8.  Ultrasound contrast microbubbles in imaging and therapy: physical principles and engineering.

Authors:  Shengping Qin; Charles F Caskey; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Accumulation of phase-shift nanoemulsions to enhance MR-guided ultrasound-mediated tumor ablation in vivo.

Authors:  Jonathan A Kopechek; Eunjoo Park; Chang-Sheng Mei; Nathan J McDannold; Tyrone M Porter
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.682

10.  Cryo-EM Visualization of Lipid and Polymer-Stabilized Perfluorocarbon Gas Nanobubbles - A Step Towards Nanobubble Mediated Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Christopher Hernandez; Sahil Gulati; Gabriella Fioravanti; Phoebe L Stewart; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  12 in total

1.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging by nature-inspired ultrastable echogenic nanobubbles.

Authors:  Al de Leon; Reshani Perera; Christopher Hernandez; Michaela Cooley; Olive Jung; Selva Jeganathan; Eric Abenojar; Grace Fishbein; Amin Jafari Sojahrood; Corey C Emerson; Phoebe L Stewart; Michael C Kolios; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 7.790

2.  Time-intensity-curve Analysis and Tumor Extravasation of Nanobubble Ultrasound Contrast Agents.

Authors:  Hanping Wu; Eric C Abenojar; Reshani Perera; Al Christopher De Leon; Tianzhi An; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Bursting Microbubbles: How Nanobubble Contrast Agents Can Enable the Future of Medical Ultrasound Molecular Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy.

Authors:  Agata A Exner; Michael C Kolios
Journal:  Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 8.209

4.  Nested Nanobubbles for Ultrasound-Triggered Drug Release.

Authors:  Damien V B Batchelor; Radwa H Abou-Saleh; P Louise Coletta; James R McLaughlan; Sally A Peyman; Stephen D Evans
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 9.229

5.  Increasing Doxorubicin Loading in Lipid-Shelled Perfluoropropane Nanobubbles via a Simple Deprotonation Strategy.

Authors:  Pinunta Nittayacharn; Eric Abenojar; Al De Leon; Dana Wegierak; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Optoacoustic/Fluorescent/Acoustic Imaging Probe Based on Air-Filled Bubbles Functionalized with Gold Nanorods and Fluorescein Isothiocyanate.

Authors:  Roman A Barmin; Polina G Rudakovskaya; Vasiliy S Chernyshev; Olga I Guslyakova; Pavel A Belcov; Ekaterina N Obukhova; Alexey V Gayer; Evgeny A Shirshin; Dmitry A Gorin
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-01-25

7.  Toward Precisely Controllable Acoustic Response of Shell-Stabilized Nanobubbles: High Yield and Narrow Dispersity.

Authors:  Amin Jafari Sojahrood; Al C de Leon; Richard Lee; Michaela Cooley; Eric C Abenojar; Michael C Kolios; Agata A Exner
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 8.  Nanosized Contrast Agents in Ultrasound Molecular Imaging.

Authors:  Fengyi Zeng; Meng Du; Zhiyi Chen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-11-29

9.  Effects of shell-integrated Sudan Black dye on the acoustic activity and ultrasound imaging properties of lipid-shelled nanoscale ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Dana Wegierak; Grace Fishbein; Eric Abenojar; Al De Leon; Jinle Zhu; Yanjie Wang; Charlotte Ferworn; Agata A Exner; Michael C Kolios
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.758

10.  SonoVue® vs. Sonazoid™ vs. Optison™: Which Bubble Is Best for Low-Intensity Sonoporation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  Spiros Kotopoulis; Mihaela Popa; Mireia Mayoral Safont; Elisa Murvold; Ragnhild Haugse; Anika Langer; Georg Dimcevski; Christina Lam; Tormod Bjånes; Odd Helge Gilja; Emmet Mc Cormack
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.