Literature DB >> 26689151

On-chip preparation of nanoscale contrast agents towards high-resolution ultrasound imaging.

Sally A Peyman1, James R McLaughlan, Radwa H Abou-Saleh, Gemma Marston, Benjamin R G Johnson, Steven Freear, P Louise Coletta, Alexander F Markham, Stephen D Evans.   

Abstract

Micron-sized lipid-stabilised bubbles of heavy gas have been utilised as contrast agents for diagnostic ultrasound (US) imaging for many years. Typically bubbles between 1 and 8 μm in diameter are produced to enhance imaging in US by scattering sound waves more efficiently than surrounding tissue. A potential area of interest for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) are bubbles with diameters <1 μm or 'nanobubbles.' As bubble diameter decreases, ultrasonic resonant frequency increases, which could lead to an improvement in resolution for high-frequency imaging applications when using nanobubbles. In addition, current US contrast agents are limited by their size to the vasculature in vivo. However, molecular-targeted nanobubbles could penetrate into the extra-vascular space of cancerous tissue providing contrast in regions inaccessible to traditional microbubbles. This paper reports a new microfluidic method for the generation of sub-micron sized lipid stabilised particles containing perfluorocarbon (PFC). The nanoparticles are produced in a unique atomisation-like flow regime at high production rates, in excess of 10(6) particles per s and at high concentration, typically >10(11) particles per mL. The average particle diameter appears to be around 100-200 nm. These particles, suspected of being a mix of liquid and gaseous C4F10 due to Laplace pressure, then phase convert into nanometer sized bubbles on the application of US. In vitro ultrasound characterisation from these nanoparticle populations showed strong backscattering compared to aqueous filled liposomes of a similar size. The nanoparticles were stable upon injection and gave excellent contrast enhancement when used for in vivo imaging, compared to microbubbles with an equivalent shell composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26689151     DOI: 10.1039/c5lc01394a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  12 in total

1.  Liter-scale production of uniform gas bubbles via parallelization of flow-focusing generators.

Authors:  Heon-Ho Jeong; Sagar Yadavali; David Issadore; Daeyeon Lee
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  Role of Surface Tension in Gas Nanobubble Stability Under Ultrasound.

Authors:  Christopher Hernandez; Lenitza Nieves; Al C de Leon; Rigoberto Advincula; Agata A Exner
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 9.229

3.  High-Frequency Array-Based Nanobubble Nonlinear Imaging in a Phantom and In Vivo.

Authors:  Carly Pellow; Emmanuel Cherin; Eric C Abenojar; Agata A Exner; Gang Zheng; Christine E M Demore; David E Goertz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Future of the Renal Biopsy: Time to Change the Conventional Modality Using Nanotechnology.

Authors:  Hamid Tayebi Khosroshahi; Behzad Abedi; Sabalan Daneshvar; Yashar Sarbaz; Abolhassan Shakeri Bavil
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2017-02-19

5.  On-chip generation of microbubbles in photoacoustic contrast agents for dual modal ultrasound/photoacoustic in vivo animal imaging.

Authors:  Dhiman Das; Kathyayini Sivasubramanian; Chun Yang; Manojit Pramanik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Nested Nanobubbles for Ultrasound-Triggered Drug Release.

Authors:  Damien V B Batchelor; Radwa H Abou-Saleh; P Louise Coletta; James R McLaughlan; Sally A Peyman; Stephen D Evans
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 9.229

7.  Acoustofluidic Measurements on Polymer-Coated Microbubbles: Primary and Secondary Bjerknes Forces.

Authors:  Gianluca Memoli; Kate O Baxter; Helen G Jones; Ken P Mingard; Bajram Zeqiri
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 8.  From Micro- to Nano-Multifunctional Theranostic Platform: Effective Ultrasound Imaging Is Not Just a Matter of Scale.

Authors:  Sara Zullino; Monica Argenziano; Ilaria Stura; Caterina Guiot; Roberta Cavalli
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.488

9.  Echographic and physical characterization of albumin-stabilized nanobubbles.

Authors:  Akiko Watanabe; Hong Sheng; Hitomi Endo; Loreto B Feril; Yutaka Irie; Koichi Ogawa; Seyedeh Moosavi-Nejad; Katsuro Tachibana
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-06-17

10.  Concurrent visual and acoustic tracking of passive and active delivery of nanobubbles to tumors.

Authors:  Carly Pellow; Eric C Abenojar; Agata A Exner; Gang Zheng; David E Goertz
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 11.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.