Literature DB >> 11978414

Physical correlates of the ultrasonic reflectivity of lipid dispersions suitable as diagnostic contrast agents.

Shao-Ling Huang1, Andrew J Hamilton, Edwin Pozharski, Ashwin Nagaraj, Melvin E Klegerman, David D McPherson, Robert C MacDonald.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the physical basis of ultrasound (US) reflectivity of echogenic lipid dispersions. These dispersions were made using a process previously described involving sonication of the lipid in water, addition of mannitol, freezing, lyophilization and rehydration. The component lipids were egg phosphatidylcholine, dipalmitoylphosphatidylethanolamine, dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol and cholesterol in a molar ratio of 69:8:8:15. Ultrasound reflectivity, as assessed with a 20-MHz intravascular US catheter and analyzed using computer-assisted videodensitometry, was found to be sensitive to variations in ambient pressure; echogenicity was greatly reduced by exposure to 0.5 atm vacuum for 10 s or 1.5 atm pressure for 10 s. Pressure changes of the magnitude that obtain in the arterial circulation had little effect on echogenicity. Vacuum treatment resulted in the release of approximately 100 microL air from a standard preparation of 10 mg lipid in 1 mL. Maximum ultrasonic reflectivity required the presence of 0.1-0.2 mol/L mannitol during the lyophilization step; mere addition of mannitol to the lipid lyophilized in the absence of mannitol produced nonreflective dispersions. Inclusion of sodium phosphate or other electrolytes reduced echogenicity. High echogenicity was associated with the presence of large-volume freeze-dried cakes and fusion of liposomes (which led to a 10 times increase in liposome diameters) during freezing before lyophilization. Lyophilization from water led to liposome fusion, but the cakes were small and US reflectivity was weak. Lyophilization from solutions of cryoprotectants such as trehalose produced large cakes, but little liposome fusion and also led to weak US reflectivity. Filtration through defined pores revealed that approximately 50% of the echogenicity originated from particles smaller than 1 microm and about 2/3 from particles smaller than 3 microm. These results indicate that lyophilization from 0.2 mol/L mannitol solution generates a disrupted array of lipid bilayers that, upon rehydration, fuse and trap small amounts of air distributed among liposome-size particles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11978414     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(01)00512-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  35 in total

1.  In vivo therapeutic gas delivery for neuroprotection with echogenic liposomes.

Authors:  George L Britton; Hyunggun Kim; Patrick H Kee; Jaroslaw Aronowski; Christy K Holland; David D McPherson; Shao-Ling Huang
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  In vitro characterization of liposomes and Optison by acoustic scattering at 3.5 MHz.

Authors:  Constantin-C Coussios; Christy K Holland; Ludwika Jakubowska; Shao-Ling Huang; Robert C MacDonald; Ashwin Nagaraj; David D McPherson
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Acoustic characterization of echogenic liposomes: frequency-dependent attenuation and backscatter.

Authors:  Jonathan A Kopechek; Kevin J Haworth; Jason L Raymond; T Douglas Mast; Stephen R Perrin; Melvin E Klegerman; Shaoling Huang; Tyrone M Porter; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  DNA-coated microbubbles with biochemically tunable ultrasound contrast activity.

Authors:  Matthew A Nakatsuka; Mark J Hsu; Sadik C Esener; Jennifer N Cha; Andrew P Goodwin
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 5.  Ultrasound molecular imaging with targeted microbubble contrast agents.

Authors:  Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Echogenic liposome compositions for increased retention of ultrasound reflectivity at physiologic temperature.

Authors:  Kyle D Buchanan; Shaoling Huang; Hyunggun Kim; Robert C Macdonald; David D McPherson
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.534

7.  Liposomal modular complexes for simultaneous targeted delivery of bioactive gases and therapeutics.

Authors:  Melvin E Klegerman; Michael Wassler; Shao-Ling Huang; Yuejiao Zou; Hyunggun Kim; Harnath S Shelat; Christy K Holland; Yong-Jian Geng; David D McPherson
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Ultrasound-triggered release of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator from echogenic liposomes.

Authors:  Denise A B Smith; Sampada S Vaidya; Jonathan A Kopechek; Shao-Ling Huang; Melvin E Klegerman; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Ultrasound enhanced matrix metalloproteinase-9 triggered release of contents from echogenic liposomes.

Authors:  Rahul Nahire; Shirshendu Paul; Michael D Scott; Raushan K Singh; Wallace W Muhonen; John Shabb; Kara N Gange; D K Srivastava; Kausik Sarkar; Sanku Mallik
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 10.  Nanotechnology in medical imaging: probe design and applications.

Authors:  David P Cormode; Torjus Skajaa; Zahi A Fayad; Willem J M Mulder
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 8.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.