Literature DB >> 31248638

Time-intensity-curve Analysis and Tumor Extravasation of Nanobubble Ultrasound Contrast Agents.

Hanping Wu1, Eric C Abenojar1, Reshani Perera1, Al Christopher De Leon1, Tianzhi An1, Agata A Exner2.   

Abstract

Our group recently presented a simple strategy using the non-ionic surfactant, Pluronic, as a size control excipient to produce nanobubbles in the 100-nm range, which exhibited stability and echogenicity on par with clinically available microbubbles. The objective of the present study was to evaluate biodistribution and extravasation of the Pluronic-stabilized lipid nanobubbles compared with microbubbles in 2 experimental tumor models in mice. Standard lipid-stabilized perfluoropropane bubbles (Pluronic L10) and lipid-stabilized perfluoropropane nanobubbles were intravenously injected into mice bearing either an orthotopic mouse breast cancer (BC4 T1) or subcutaneous mouse ovarian cancer (OVCAR-3) through the tail vein to perform perfusion dynamic studies. No significant differences between the nanobubble and microbubble groups were observed in the peak enhancement of the 3 tested regions (tumor, liver and kidney). However, the decay rates of nanobubble in the tumor and kidney of BC4 T1-bearing mice, as well as in mice with OVRCAR-3 tumors were significantly slower than those of the microbubble. To quantify extravasation, fluorescently labeled bubbles were intravenously injected into mice bearing the same tumors. Histologic analysis showed that nanobubbles were retained in tumor tissue to a greater extent compared with microbubbles in both tumor models at the 3-h time point. Our results demonstrate unique nanobubble behavior compared with microbubbles and support augmented application of these agents in ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery beyond the tumor vasculature.
Copyright © 2019 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Microbubbles; Nanobubbles; Ovarian cancer

Year:  2019        PMID: 31248638      PMCID: PMC6689247          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  36 in total

Review 1.  Indicator dilution models for the quantification of microvascular blood flow with bolus administration of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Costas Strouthos; Marios Lampaskis; Vassilis Sboros; Alan McNeilly; Michalakis Averkiou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: value of a morphologic scoring system.

Authors:  S Topuz; H Saygili; S Akhan; E Yavuz; A Turfanda; S Berkman
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.196

3.  Novel dual-mode nanobubbles as potential targeted contrast agents for female tumors exploration.

Authors:  Hengli Yang; Tian Zhou; Wenbin Cai; Xiaomin Yi; Xi Liu; Yixiao Wang; Li Zhang; Yunyou Duan
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-08-19

4.  Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound improves the diagnostic accuracy for ovarian cancer prediction.

Authors:  L S Cohen; P F Escobar; C Scharm; B Glimco; D A Fishman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Ultrasound molecular imaging of ovarian cancer with CA-125 targeted nanobubble contrast agents.

Authors:  Yong Gao; Christopher Hernandez; Hai-Xia Yuan; Jacob Lilly; Pavan Kota; Haoyan Zhou; Hanping Wu; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 5.307

6.  Ultrasound characteristics of different types of adnexal malignancies.

Authors:  Lil Valentin; Lieveke Ameye; Antonia Testa; Fabrice Lécuru; Jean-Pierre Bernard; Dario Paladini; Sabine Van Huffel; Dirk Timmerman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Tumor angiogenic marker expression levels during tumor growth: longitudinal assessment with molecularly targeted microbubbles and US imaging.

Authors:  Nirupama Deshpande; Ying Ren; Kira Foygel; Jarrett Rosenberg; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).

Authors:  Usha Menon; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Rachel Hallett; Andy Ryan; Matthew Burnell; Aarti Sharma; Sara Lewis; Susan Davies; Susan Philpott; Alberto Lopes; Keith Godfrey; David Oram; Jonathan Herod; Karin Williamson; Mourad W Seif; Ian Scott; Tim Mould; Robert Woolas; John Murdoch; Stephen Dobbs; Nazar N Amso; Simon Leeson; Derek Cruickshank; Alistair McGuire; Stuart Campbell; Lesley Fallowfield; Naveena Singh; Anne Dawnay; Steven J Skates; Mahesh Parmar; Ian Jacobs
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Acoustic characterization and pharmacokinetic analyses of new nanobubble ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Hanping Wu; Nicolas G Rognin; Tianyi M Krupka; Luis Solorio; Hiroki Yoshiara; Gilles Guenette; Christopher Sanders; Naohisa Kamiyama; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Nanobubbles for enhanced ultrasound imaging of tumors.

Authors:  Tinghui Yin; Ping Wang; Rongqin Zheng; Bowen Zheng; Du Cheng; Xinling Zhang; Xintao Shuai
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-02-22
View more
  15 in total

1.  Bursting Microbubbles: How Nanobubble Contrast Agents Can Enable the Future of Medical Ultrasound Molecular Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy.

Authors:  Agata A Exner; Michael C Kolios
Journal:  Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 8.209

2.  Detecting insulitis in type 1 diabetes with ultrasound phase-change contrast agents.

Authors:  David G Ramirez; Mark Ciccaglione; Awaneesh K Upadhyay; Vinh T Pham; Mark A Borden; Richard K P Benninger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nested Nanobubbles for Ultrasound-Triggered Drug Release.

Authors:  Damien V B Batchelor; Radwa H Abou-Saleh; P Louise Coletta; James R McLaughlan; Sally A Peyman; Stephen D Evans
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 9.229

4.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with sub-micron sized contrast agents detects insulitis in mouse models of type1 diabetes.

Authors:  David G Ramirez; Eric Abenojar; Christopher Hernandez; David S Lorberbaum; Lucine A Papazian; Samantha Passman; Vinh Pham; Agata A Exner; Richard K P Benninger
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Nanobubble Mediated Gene Delivery in Conjunction With a Hand-Held Ultrasound Scanner.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kida; Koyo Nishimura; Koki Ogawa; Akiko Watanabe; Loreto B Feril; Yutaka Irie; Hitomi Endo; Shigeru Kawakami; Katsuro Tachibana
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Ultrasound-Based Molecular Imaging of Tumors with PTPmu Biomarker-Targeted Nanobubble Contrast Agents.

Authors:  Mette L Johansen; Reshani Perera; Eric Abenojar; Xinning Wang; Jason Vincent; Agata A Exner; Susann M Brady-Kalnay
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Ultrasound-sensitive siRNA-loaded nanobubbles fabrication and antagonism in drug resistance for NSCLC.

Authors:  Chunhong Su; XiaoJun Ren; Fang Yang; Bin Li; Hao Wu; Hui Li; Fang Nie
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 6.419

Review 8.  Current advances in ultrasound-combined nanobubbles for cancer-targeted therapy: a review of the current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Chunhong Su; XiaoJun Ren; Fang Nie; Tiangang Li; Wenhao Lv; Hui Li; Yao Zhang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 9.  Biomedical nanobubbles and opportunities for microfluidics.

Authors:  Ali A Paknahad; Liam Kerr; Daniel A Wong; Michael C Kolios; Scott S H Tsai
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 4.036

10.  Concurrent visual and acoustic tracking of passive and active delivery of nanobubbles to tumors.

Authors:  Carly Pellow; Eric C Abenojar; Agata A Exner; Gang Zheng; David E Goertz
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 11.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.