Literature DB >> 19229096

Ultrasound contrast microbubbles in imaging and therapy: physical principles and engineering.

Shengping Qin1, Charles F Caskey, Katherine W Ferrara.   

Abstract

Microbubble contrast agents and the associated imaging systems have developed over the past 25 years, originating with manually-agitated fluids introduced for intra-coronary injection. Over this period, stabilizing shells and low diffusivity gas materials have been incorporated in microbubbles, extending stability in vitro and in vivo. Simultaneously, the interaction of these small gas bubbles with ultrasonic waves has been extensively studied, resulting in models for oscillation and increasingly sophisticated imaging strategies. Early studies recognized that echoes from microbubbles contained frequencies that are multiples of the microbubble resonance frequency. Although individual microbubble contrast agents cannot be resolved-given that their diameter is on the order of microns-nonlinear echoes from these agents are used to map regions of perfused tissue and to estimate the local microvascular flow rate. Such strategies overcome a fundamental limitation of previous ultrasound blood flow strategies; the previous Doppler-based strategies are insensitive to capillary flow. Further, the insonation of resonant bubbles results in interesting physical phenomena that have been widely studied for use in drug and gene delivery. Ultrasound pressure can enhance gas diffusion, rapidly fragment the agent into a set of smaller bubbles or displace the microbubble to a blood vessel wall. Insonation of a microbubble can also produce liquid jets and local shear stress that alter biological membranes and facilitate transport. In this review, we focus on the physical aspects of these agents, exploring microbubble imaging modes, models for microbubble oscillation and the interaction of the microbubble with the endothelium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19229096      PMCID: PMC2818980          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/6/R01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  143 in total

Review 1.  Targeted ultrasonic contrast agents for molecular imaging and therapy.

Authors:  G M Lanza; S A Wickline
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.194

2.  DNA-loaded albumin microbubbles enhance ultrasound-mediated transfection in vitro.

Authors:  Peter A Frenkel; Shuyuan Chen; To Thai; Ralph V Shohet; Paul A Grayburn
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements.

Authors:  N de Jong; L Hoff; T Skotland; N Bom
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Bubble pulsations between parallel plates.

Authors:  Jianying Cui; Mark F Hamilton; Preston S Wilson; Evgenia A Zabolotskaya
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Microbubble responses to a similar mechanical index with different real-time perfusion imaging techniques.

Authors:  Thomas R Porter; Joseph Oberdorfer; Patrick Rafter; John Lof; Feng Xie
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion.

Authors:  K Wei; A R Jayaweera; S Firoozan; A Linka; D M Skyba; S Kaul
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-10       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Upregulation of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 at atherosclerosis-prone sites on the endothelium in the ApoE-deficient mouse.

Authors:  Y Nakashima; E W Raines; A S Plump; J L Breslow; R Ross
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 8.311

8.  Quantification of perfusion of liver tissue and metastases using a multivessel model for replenishment kinetics of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Martin Krix; Christian Plathow; Fabian Kiessling; Felix Herth; Andreas Karcher; Marco Essig; Harry Schmitteckert; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Stefan Delorme
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Comparing contrast-enhanced ultrasound to immunohistochemical markers of angiogenesis in a human melanoma xenograft model: preliminary results.

Authors:  Flemming Forsberg; Adam P Dicker; Mattew L Thakur; Nandkumar M Rawool; Ji-Bin Liu; William T Shi; Levon N Nazarian
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  SURF imaging: in vivo demonstration of an ultrasound contrast agent detection technique.

Authors:  S E Masoy; O Standal; P Nasholm; T F Johansen; Bjorn Angelsen; Rune Hansen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.725

View more
  108 in total

1.  Ultrasound-mediated tumor imaging and nanotherapy using drug loaded, block copolymer stabilized perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions.

Authors:  Natalya Rapoport; Kweon-Ho Nam; Roohi Gupta; Zhongao Gao; Praveena Mohan; Allison Payne; Nick Todd; Xin Liu; Taeho Kim; Jill Shea; Courtney Scaife; Dennis L Parker; Eun-Kee Jeong; Anne M Kennedy
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 9.776

2.  A reduced-order, single-bubble cavitation model with applications to therapeutic ultrasound.

Authors:  Wayne Kreider; Lawrence A Crum; Michael R Bailey; Oleg A Sapozhnikov
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Improving the sensitivity of high-frequency subharmonic imaging with coded excitation: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Blood oxygenation using microbubble suspensions.

Authors:  Noriaki Matsuki; Shingo Ichiba; Takuji Ishikawa; Osamu Nagano; Motohiro Takeda; Yoshihito Ujike; Takami Yamaguchi
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 1.733

5.  Polyplex-microbubble hybrids for ultrasound-guided plasmid DNA delivery to solid tumors.

Authors:  Shashank R Sirsi; Sonia L Hernandez; Lukasz Zielinski; Henning Blomback; Adel Koubaa; Milo Synder; Shunichi Homma; Jessica J Kandel; Darrell J Yamashiro; Mark A Borden
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 6.  A shift from cell cultures to creatures: in vivo imaging of small animals in experimental regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Anna J Studwell; Darrell N Kotton
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 11.454

7.  Model for bubble pulsation in liquid between parallel viscoelastic layers.

Authors:  Todd A Hay; Yurii A Ilinskii; Evgenia A Zabolotskaya; Mark F Hamilton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A model for the dynamics of ultrasound contrast agents in vivo.

Authors:  Shengping Qin; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  In situ bone tissue engineering via ultrasound-mediated gene delivery to endogenous progenitor cells in mini-pigs.

Authors:  Maxim Bez; Dmitriy Sheyn; Wafa Tawackoli; Pablo Avalos; Galina Shapiro; Joseph C Giaconi; Xiaoyu Da; Shiran Ben David; Jayne Gavrity; Hani A Awad; Hyun W Bae; Eric J Ley; Thomas J Kremen; Zulma Gazit; Katherine W Ferrara; Gadi Pelled; Dan Gazit
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 17.956

10.  The delayed onset of subharmonic and ultraharmonic emissions from a phospholipid-shelled microbubble contrast agent.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Ivy Awuor; Keri Thomas; Joshua J Rychak; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.