Literature DB >> 29444860

Humans quickly learn to blink strategically in response to environmental task demands.

David Hoppe1,2, Stefan Helfmann2, Constantin A Rothkopf3,2,4.   

Abstract

Eye blinking is one of the most frequent human actions. The control of blinking is thought to reflect complex interactions between maintaining clear and healthy vision and influences tied to central dopaminergic functions including cognitive states, psychological factors, and medical conditions. The most imminent consequence of blinking is a temporary loss of vision. Minimizing this loss of information is a prominent explanation for changes in blink rates and temporarily suppressed blinks, but quantifying this loss is difficult, as environmental regularities are usually complex and unknown. Here we used a controlled detection experiment with parametrically generated event statistics to investigate human blinking control. Subjects were able to learn environmental regularities and adapted their blinking behavior strategically to better detect future events. Crucially, our design enabled us to develop a computational model that allows quantifying the consequence of blinking in terms of task performance. The model formalizes ideas from active perception by describing blinking in terms of optimal control in trading off intrinsic costs for blink suppression with task-related costs for missing an event under perceptual uncertainty. Remarkably, this model not only is sufficient to reproduce key characteristics of the observed blinking behavior such as blink suppression and blink compensation but also predicts without further assumptions the well-known and diverse distributions of time intervals between blinks, for which an explanation has long been elusive.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational modeling; eye blinks; individual differences; interblink intervals; internal costs

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29444860      PMCID: PMC5834680          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1714220115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  42 in total

1.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Out of mind, out of sight: eye blinking as indicator and embodiment of mind wandering.

Authors:  Daniel Smilek; Jonathan S A Carriere; J Allan Cheyne
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-04-07

3.  Spontaneous interblink time distributions in patients with Graves' orbitopathy and normal subjects.

Authors:  Denny Garcia; Carolina Trindade Pinto; José Carlos Barbosa; Antonio A V Cruz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Withdrawal of voluntary inhibition unravels the off state of the spontaneous blink generator.

Authors:  Timoleon Moraitis; Arko Ghosh
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Eyeblinks and visual suppression.

Authors:  F C Volkmann; L A Riggs; R K Moore
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Interactions between gaze-evoked blinks and gaze shifts in monkeys.

Authors:  Neeraj J Gandhi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Looking just below the eyes is optimal across face recognition tasks.

Authors:  Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Learning where to look for a hidden target.

Authors:  Leanne Chukoskie; Joseph Snider; Michael C Mozer; Richard J Krauzlis; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Learning rational temporal eye movement strategies.

Authors:  David Hoppe; Constantin A Rothkopf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Spontaneous eyeblinks are correlated with responses during the Stroop task.

Authors:  Jihoon Oh; Mookyung Han; Bradley S Peterson; Jaeseung Jeong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  A songbird inhibits blinking behaviour in flight.

Authors:  Jessica L Yorzinski
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Resolving visual motion through perceptual gaps.

Authors:  Lina Teichmann; Grace Edwards; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Real-Time MRI Reveals Unique Insight into the Full Kinematics of Eye Movements.

Authors:  Johannes Kirchner; Tamara Watson; Markus Lappe
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-01-07

4.  Reliability and efficacy of maximum fluorescein tear break-up time in diagnosing dry eye disease.

Authors:  Yujie Mou; Huan Xiang; Lin Lin; Kelan Yuan; Xin Wang; Yaying Wu; Jinjin Min; Xiuming Jin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Threshold-varying integrate-and-fire model reproduces distributions of spontaneous blink intervals.

Authors:  Ryota Nomura; Ying-Zong Liang; Kenji Morita; Kantaro Fujiwara; Tohru Ikeguchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Rapid serial blinks: An index of temporally increased cognitive load.

Authors:  Ryota Nomura; Shunichi Maruno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Boosted visual performance after eye blinks.

Authors:  Jit Wei A Ang; Gerrit W Maus
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.