Literature DB >> 23150543

Looking just below the eyes is optimal across face recognition tasks.

Matthew F Peterson1, Miguel P Eckstein.   

Abstract

When viewing a human face, people often look toward the eyes. Maintaining good eye contact carries significant social value and allows for the extraction of information about gaze direction. When identifying faces, humans also look toward the eyes, but it is unclear whether this behavior is solely a byproduct of the socially important eye movement behavior or whether it has functional importance in basic perceptual tasks. Here, we propose that gaze behavior while determining a person's identity, emotional state, or gender can be explained as an adaptive brain strategy to learn eye movement plans that optimize performance in these evolutionarily important perceptual tasks. We show that humans move their eyes to locations that maximize perceptual performance determining the identity, gender, and emotional state of a face. These optimal fixation points, which differ moderately across tasks, are predicted correctly by a Bayesian ideal observer that integrates information optimally across the face but is constrained by the decrease in resolution and sensitivity from the fovea toward the visual periphery (foveated ideal observer). Neither a model that disregards the foveated nature of the visual system and makes fixations on the local region with maximal information, nor a model that makes center-of-gravity fixations correctly predict human eye movements. Extension of the foveated ideal observer framework to a large database of real-world faces shows that the optimality of these strategies generalizes across the population. These results suggest that the human visual system optimizes face recognition performance through guidance of eye movements not only toward but, more precisely, just below the eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23150543      PMCID: PMC3511732          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1214269109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  48 in total

1.  Eye-movement-based memory effect: a reprocessing effect in face perception.

Authors:  R R Althoff; N J Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information.

Authors:  Philippe G Schyns; Lizann Bonnar; Frédéric Gosselin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-09

3.  Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing.

Authors:  Allison B Sekuler; Carl M Gaspar; Jason M Gold; Patrick J Bennett
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Transmitting and decoding facial expressions.

Authors:  Marie L Smith; Garrison W Cottrell; Frédéric Gosselin; Philippe G Schyns
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-03

5.  The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Eye movement strategies involved in face perception.

Authors:  G J Walker-Smith; A G Gale; J M Findlay
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  The role of scanpaths in facial recognition and learning.

Authors:  M Rizzo; R Hurtig; A R Damasio
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 10.422

8.  Psychophysics of perceiving eye-gaze and head direction with peripheral vision: implications for the dynamics of eye-gaze behavior.

Authors:  Jack M Loomis; Jonathan W Kelly; Matthias Pusch; Jeremy N Bailenson; Andrew C Beall
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Scan patterns during the processing of facial identity in prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Jason J S Barton; Nathan Radcliffe; Mariya V Cherkasova; Jay A Edelman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Eye contact detection in humans from birth.

Authors:  Teresa Farroni; Gergely Csibra; Francesca Simion; Mark H Johnson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  67 in total

1.  Initial eye movements during face identification are optimal and similar across cultures.

Authors:  Charles C-F Or; Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Intentionally distracting: Working memory is disrupted by the perception of other agents attending to you - even without eye-gaze cues.

Authors:  Clara Colombatto; Benjamin van Buren; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

3.  Developmental prosopagnosics have widespread selectivity reductions across category-selective visual cortex.

Authors:  Guo Jiahui; Hua Yang; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A link between individual differences in multisensory speech perception and eye movements.

Authors:  Demet Gurler; Nathan Doyle; Edgar Walker; John Magnotti; Michael Beauchamp
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Efficient saccade planning requires time and clear choices.

Authors:  Saiedeh Ghahghaei; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Ventromedial frontal lobe damage affects interpretation, not exploration, of emotional facial expressions.

Authors:  Avinash R Vaidya; Lesley K Fellows
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Faces in the eye of the beholder: unique and stable eye scanning patterns of individual observers.

Authors:  Eyal Mehoudar; Joseph Arizpe; Chris I Baker; Galit Yovel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Free viewing of talking faces reveals mouth and eye preferring regions of the human superior temporal sulcus.

Authors:  Johannes Rennig; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Ongoing Cognitive Processing Influences Precise Eye-Movement Targets in Reading.

Authors:  Klinton Bicknell; Roger Levy; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-02-27

10.  Learning optimal eye movements to unusual faces.

Authors:  Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.