Literature DB >> 23754404

Learning where to look for a hidden target.

Leanne Chukoskie1, Joseph Snider, Michael C Mozer, Richard J Krauzlis, Terrence J Sejnowski.   

Abstract

Survival depends on successfully foraging for food, for which evolution has selected diverse behaviors in different species. Humans forage not only for food, but also for information. We decide where to look over 170,000 times per day, approximately three times per wakeful second. The frequency of these saccadic eye movements belies the complexity underlying each individual choice. Experience factors into the choice of where to look and can be invoked to rapidly redirect gaze in a context and task-appropriate manner. However, remarkably little is known about how individuals learn to direct their gaze given the current context and task. We designed a task in which participants search a novel scene for a target whose location was drawn stochastically on each trial from a fixed prior distribution. The target was invisible on a blank screen, and the participants were rewarded when they fixated the hidden target location. In just a few trials, participants rapidly found the hidden targets by looking near previously rewarded locations and avoiding previously unrewarded locations. Learning trajectories were well characterized by a simple reinforcement-learning (RL) model that maintained and continually updated a reward map of locations. The RL model made further predictions concerning sensitivity to recent experience that were confirmed by the data. The asymptotic performance of both the participants and the RL model approached optimal performance characterized by an ideal-observer theory. These two complementary levels of explanation show how experience in a novel environment drives visual search in humans and may extend to other forms of search such as animal foraging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ideal observer; oculomotor; reinforcement learning; saccades

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23754404      PMCID: PMC3690606          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1301216110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  59 in total

Review 1.  The predictive brain: temporal coincidence and temporal order in synaptic learning mechanisms.

Authors:  P R Montague; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 2.  Exploring the consequences of the previous trial.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Scene content selected by active vision.

Authors:  Derrick J Parkhurst; Ernst Niebur
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

Review 4.  Control of movements and temporal discounting of reward.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  The relative contribution of scene context and target features to visual search in scenes.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; Chelsea Heaven
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Optimal search strategies for hidden targets.

Authors:  O Bénichou; M Coppey; M Moreau; P-H Suet; R Voituriez
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2005-05-16       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Behavior of humans in variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi; P Bevan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Optimal random search for a single hidden target.

Authors:  Joseph Snider
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2011-01-05

Review 9.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Neuroethology of decision-making.

Authors:  Geoffrey K Adams; Karli K Watson; John Pearson; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 6.627

View more
  20 in total

1.  Habit Learning by Naive Macaques Is Marked by Response Sharpening of Striatal Neurons Representing the Cost and Outcome of Acquired Action Sequences.

Authors:  Theresa M Desrochers; Ken-ichi Amemori; Ann M Graybiel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  In the light of evolution VII: The human mental machinery.

Authors:  Camilo J Cela-Conde; Raúl Gutiérrez Lombardo; John C Avise; Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Efficient saccade planning requires time and clear choices.

Authors:  Saiedeh Ghahghaei; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Spatial scale, rather than nature of task or locomotion, modulates the spatial reference frame of attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Bo-Yeong Won
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Humans quickly learn to blink strategically in response to environmental task demands.

Authors:  David Hoppe; Stefan Helfmann; Constantin A Rothkopf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Changing viewer perspectives reveals constraints to implicit visual statistical learning.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Optimal policy for attention-modulated decisions explains human fixation behavior.

Authors:  Anthony I Jang; Ravi Sharma; Jan Drugowitsch
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Learning optimal eye movements to unusual faces.

Authors:  Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Correlation of neural activity with behavioral kinematics reveals distinct sensory encoding and evidence accumulation processes during active tactile sensing.

Authors:  Ioannis Delis; Jacek P Dmochowski; Paul Sajda; Qi Wang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Active sensing in the categorization of visual patterns.

Authors:  Scott Cheng-Hsin Yang; Máté Lengyel; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.