Literature DB >> 29440496

CRISPR/Cas9 cleavages in budding yeast reveal templated insertions and strand-specific insertion/deletion profiles.

Brenda R Lemos1,2, Adam C Kaplan1,2, Ji Eun Bae1,2, Alexander E Ferrazzoli1,2, James Kuo1,2, Ranjith P Anand1,2, David P Waterman1,2, James E Haber3,2.   

Abstract

Harnessing CRISPR-Cas9 technology provides an unprecedented ability to modify genomic loci via DNA double-strand break (DSB) induction and repair. We analyzed nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair induced by Cas9 in budding yeast and found that the orientation of binding of Cas9 and its guide RNA (gRNA) profoundly influences the pattern of insertion/deletions (indels) at the site of cleavage. A common indel created by Cas9 is a 1-bp (+1) insertion that appears to result from Cas9 creating a 1-nt 5' overhang that is filled in by a DNA polymerase and ligated. The origin of +1 insertions was investigated by using two gRNAs with PAM sequences located on opposite DNA strands but designed to cleave the same sequence. These templated +1 insertions are dependent on the X-family DNA polymerase, Pol4. Deleting Pol4 also eliminated +2 and +3 insertions, which are biased toward homonucleotide insertions. Using inverted PAM sequences, we also found significant differences in overall NHEJ efficiency and repair profiles, suggesting that the binding of the Cas9:gRNA complex influences subsequent NHEJ processing. As with events induced by the site-specific HO endonuclease, CRISPR-Cas9-mediated NHEJ repair depends on the Ku heterodimer and DNA ligase 4. Cas9 events are highly dependent on the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex, independent of Mre11's nuclease activity. Inspection of the outcomes of a large number of Cas9 cleavage events in mammalian cells reveals a similar templated origin of +1 insertions in human cells, but also a significant frequency of similarly templated +2 insertions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; DNA polymerase 4; double-strand breaks; nonhomologous end-joining; templated insertions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29440496      PMCID: PMC5834694          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1716855115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  47 in total

1.  Uses and abuses of HO endonuclease.

Authors:  James E Haber
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Biochemical properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase IV.

Authors:  Katarzyna Bebenek; Miguel Garcia-Diaz; Steven R Patishall; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  A gradient of template dependence defines distinct biological roles for family X polymerases in nonhomologous end joining.

Authors:  Stephanie A Nick McElhinny; Jody M Havener; Miguel Garcia-Diaz; Raquel Juárez; Katarzyna Bebenek; Barbara L Kee; Luis Blanco; Thomas A Kunkel; Dale A Ramsden
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Recombination-mediated PCR-directed plasmid construction in vivo in yeast.

Authors:  K R Oldenburg; K T Vo; S Michaelis; C Paddon
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Generation of gene-modified mice via Cas9/RNA-mediated gene targeting.

Authors:  Bin Shen; Jun Zhang; Hongya Wu; Jianying Wang; Ke Ma; Zheng Li; Xueguang Zhang; Pumin Zhang; Xingxu Huang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 25.617

6.  Microhomology-based choice of Cas9 nuclease target sites.

Authors:  Sangsu Bae; Jiyeon Kweon; Heon Seok Kim; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  A 24-base-pair DNA sequence from the MAT locus stimulates intergenic recombination in yeast.

Authors:  J A Nickoloff; E Y Chen; F Heffron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Microhomology-mediated end-joining-dependent integration of donor DNA in cells and animals using TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Shota Nakade; Takuya Tsubota; Yuto Sakane; Satoshi Kume; Naoaki Sakamoto; Masanobu Obara; Takaaki Daimon; Hideki Sezutsu; Takashi Yamamoto; Tetsushi Sakuma; Ken-ichi T Suzuki
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Cas9-catalyzed DNA Cleavage Generates Staggered Ends: Evidence from Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Zhicheng Zuo; Jin Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR.

Authors:  Jiajie Zhang; Kassian Kobert; Tomáš Flouri; Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  55 in total

1.  Very fast CRISPR on demand.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Roger S Zou; Shuaixin He; Yuta Nihongaki; Xiaoguang Li; Shiva Razavi; Bin Wu; Taekjip Ha
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Repair of a Site-Specific DNA Cleavage: Old-School Lessons for Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing.

Authors:  Danielle N Gallagher; James E Haber
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 5.100

3.  Parp3 promotes long-range end joining in murine cells.

Authors:  Jacob V Layer; J Patrick Cleary; Alexander J Brown; Kristen E Stevenson; Sara N Morrow; Alexandria Van Scoyk; Rafael B Blasco; Elif Karaca; Fei-Long Meng; Richard L Frock; Trevor Tivey; Sunhee Kim; Hailey Fuchs; Roberto Chiarle; Frederick W Alt; Steven A Roberts; David M Weinstock; Tovah A Day
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Predicting the mutations generated by repair of Cas9-induced double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Felicity Allen; Luca Crepaldi; Clara Alsinet; Alexander J Strong; Vitalii Kleshchevnikov; Pietro De Angeli; Petra Páleníková; Anton Khodak; Vladimir Kiselev; Michael Kosicki; Andrew R Bassett; Heather Harding; Yaron Galanty; Francisco Muñoz-Martínez; Emmanouil Metzakopian; Stephen P Jackson; Leopold Parts
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Developmental barcoding of whole mouse via homing CRISPR.

Authors:  Reza Kalhor; Kian Kalhor; Leo Mejia; Kathleen Leeper; Amanda Graveline; Prashant Mali; George M Church
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Massively parallel kinetic profiling of natural and engineered CRISPR nucleases.

Authors:  Stephen K Jones; John A Hawkins; Nicole V Johnson; Cheulhee Jung; Kuang Hu; James R Rybarski; Janice S Chen; Jennifer A Doudna; William H Press; Ilya J Finkelstein
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Decoding non-random mutational signatures at Cas9 targeted sites.

Authors:  Amir Taheri-Ghahfarokhi; Benjamin J M Taylor; Roberto Nitsch; Anders Lundin; Anna-Lina Cavallo; Katja Madeyski-Bengtson; Fredrik Karlsson; Maryam Clausen; Ryan Hicks; Lorenz M Mayr; Mohammad Bohlooly-Y; Marcello Maresca
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Determinants of Base Editing Outcomes from Target Library Analysis and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Mandana Arbab; Max W Shen; Beverly Mok; Christopher Wilson; Żaneta Matuszek; Christopher A Cassa; David R Liu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  CRISPR Correction of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Yi-Li Min; Rhonda Bassel-Duby; Eric N Olson
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 13.739

10.  Rational Selection of CRISPR-Cas9 Guide RNAs for Homology-Directed Genome Editing.

Authors:  Kristina J Tatiossian; Robert D E Clark; Chun Huang; Matthew E Thornton; Brendan H Grubbs; Paula M Cannon
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 11.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.