Literature DB >> 16061182

A gradient of template dependence defines distinct biological roles for family X polymerases in nonhomologous end joining.

Stephanie A Nick McElhinny1, Jody M Havener, Miguel Garcia-Diaz, Raquel Juárez, Katarzyna Bebenek, Barbara L Kee, Luis Blanco, Thomas A Kunkel, Dale A Ramsden.   

Abstract

Three Pol X family members have been linked to nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) in mammals. Template-independent TdT promotes diversity during NHEJ-dependent repair of V(D)J recombination intermediates, but the roles of the template-dependent polymerases mu and lambda in NHEJ remain unclear. We show here that pol mu and pol lambda are similarly recruited by NHEJ factors to fill gaps when ends have partially complementary overhangs, suggesting equivalent roles promoting accuracy in NHEJ. However, only pol mu promotes accuracy during immunoglobulin kappa recombination. This distinctive in vivo role correlates with the TdT-like ability of pol mu, but not pol lambda, to act when primer termini lack complementary bases in the template strand. However, unlike TdT, synthesis by pol mu in this context is primarily instructed by a template from another DNA molecule. This apparent gradient of template dependence is largely attributable to a small structural element that is present but different in all three polymerases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16061182     DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  152 in total

1.  Error-prone DNA repair activity during somatic hypermutation in shark B lymphocytes.

Authors:  Catherine Zhu; Ellen Hsu
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 2.  Polymerases in nonhomologous end joining: building a bridge over broken chromosomes.

Authors:  Dale A Ramsden
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 8.401

3.  Creative template-dependent synthesis by human polymerase mu.

Authors:  Andrea F Moon; Rajendrakumar A Gosavi; Thomas A Kunkel; Lars C Pedersen; Katarzyna Bebenek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  DNA-PK: a dynamic enzyme in a versatile DSB repair pathway.

Authors:  Anthony J Davis; Benjamin P C Chen; David J Chen
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-03-27

5.  Structural evidence for an in trans base selection mechanism involving Loop1 in polymerase μ at an NHEJ double-strand break junction.

Authors:  Jérôme Loc'h; Christina A Gerodimos; Sandrine Rosario; Mustafa Tekpinar; Michael R Lieber; Marc Delarue
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Howard H Y Chang; Nicholas R Pannunzio; Noritaka Adachi; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 7.  Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: a convenient model system for the study of DNA repair in photoautotrophic eukaryotes.

Authors:  Daniel Vlcek; Andrea Sevcovicová; Barbara Sviezená; Eliska Gálová; Eva Miadoková
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 8.  Role of recombination activating genes in the generation of antigen receptor diversity and beyond.

Authors:  Mayilaadumveettil Nishana; Sathees C Raghavan
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.397

9.  Structural basis for a novel mechanism of DNA bridging and alignment in eukaryotic DSB DNA repair.

Authors:  Jérôme Gouge; Sandrine Rosario; Félix Romain; Frédéric Poitevin; Pierre Béguin; Marc Delarue
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Role of the catalytic metal during polymerization by DNA polymerase lambda.

Authors:  Miguel Garcia-Diaz; Katarzyna Bebenek; Joseph M Krahn; Lars C Pedersen; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.