Literature DB >> 33160457

Rational Selection of CRISPR-Cas9 Guide RNAs for Homology-Directed Genome Editing.

Kristina J Tatiossian1, Robert D E Clark1, Chun Huang1, Matthew E Thornton2, Brendan H Grubbs2, Paula M Cannon3.   

Abstract

Homology-directed repair (HDR) of a DNA break allows copying of genetic material from an exogenous DNA template and is frequently exploited in CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. However, HDR is in competition with other DNA repair pathways, including non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ), and the efficiency of HDR outcomes is not predictable. Consequently, to optimize HDR editing, panels of CRISPR-Cas9 guide RNAs (gRNAs) and matched homology templates must be evaluated. We report here that CRISPR-Cas9 indel signatures can instead be used to identify gRNAs that maximize HDR outcomes. Specifically, we show that the frequency of deletions resulting from MMEJ repair, characterized as deletions greater than or equal to 3 bp, better predicts HDR frequency than consideration of total indel frequency. We further demonstrate that tools that predict gRNA indel signatures can be repurposed to identify gRNAs to promote HDR. Finally, by comparing indels generated by S. aureus and S. pyogenes Cas9 targeted to the same site, we add to the growing body of data that the targeted DNA sequence is a major factor governing genome editing outcomes.
Copyright © 2020 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33160457      PMCID: PMC7934447          DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ther        ISSN: 1525-0016            Impact factor:   11.454


  65 in total

1.  Predictable and precise template-free CRISPR editing of pathogenic variants.

Authors:  Max W Shen; Mandana Arbab; Jonathan Y Hsu; Daniel Worstell; Sannie J Culbertson; Olga Krabbe; Christopher A Cassa; David R Liu; David K Gifford; Richard I Sherwood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Repair Pathway Choices and Consequences at the Double-Strand Break.

Authors:  Raphael Ceccaldi; Beatrice Rondinelli; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 20.808

Review 3.  Main steps in DNA double-strand break repair: an introduction to homologous recombination and related processes.

Authors:  Lepakshi Ranjha; Sean M Howard; Petr Cejka
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Enhanced CRISPR/Cas9-mediated precise genome editing by improved design and delivery of gRNA, Cas9 nuclease, and donor DNA.

Authors:  Xiquan Liang; Jason Potter; Shantanu Kumar; Namritha Ravinder; Jonathan D Chesnut
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Decoding non-random mutational signatures at Cas9 targeted sites.

Authors:  Amir Taheri-Ghahfarokhi; Benjamin J M Taylor; Roberto Nitsch; Anders Lundin; Anna-Lina Cavallo; Katja Madeyski-Bengtson; Fredrik Karlsson; Maryam Clausen; Ryan Hicks; Lorenz M Mayr; Mohammad Bohlooly-Y; Marcello Maresca
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  A role for FEN-1 in nonhomologous DNA end joining: the order of strand annealing and nucleolytic processing events.

Authors:  X Wu; T E Wilson; M R Lieber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Conservative homologous recombination preferentially repairs DNA double-strand breaks in the S phase of the cell cycle in human cells.

Authors:  Nasrollah Saleh-Gohari; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Establishment of HIV-1 resistance in CD4+ T cells by genome editing using zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Elena E Perez; Jianbin Wang; Jeffrey C Miller; Yann Jouvenot; Kenneth A Kim; Olga Liu; Nathaniel Wang; Gary Lee; Victor V Bartsevich; Ya-Li Lee; Dmitry Y Guschin; Igor Rupniewski; Adam J Waite; Carmine Carpenito; Richard G Carroll; Jordan S Orange; Fyodor D Urnov; Edward J Rebar; Dale Ando; Philip D Gregory; James L Riley; Michael C Holmes; Carl H June
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-06-29       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Dominik Paquet; Dylan Kwart; Antonia Chen; Andrew Sproul; Samson Jacob; Shaun Teo; Kimberly Moore Olsen; Andrew Gregg; Scott Noggle; Marc Tessier-Lavigne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Methodologies for Improving HDR Efficiency.

Authors:  Mingjie Liu; Saad Rehman; Xidian Tang; Kui Gu; Qinlei Fan; Dekun Chen; Wentao Ma
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  8 in total

1.  High-yield genome engineering in primary cells using a hybrid ssDNA repair template and small-molecule cocktails.

Authors:  Brian R Shy; Vivasvan S Vykunta; Alvin Ha; Alexis Talbot; Theodore L Roth; David N Nguyen; Wolfgang G Pfeifer; Yan Yi Chen; Franziska Blaeschke; Eric Shifrut; Shane Vedova; Murad R Mamedov; Jing-Yi Jing Chung; Hong Li; Ruby Yu; David Wu; Jeffrey Wolf; Thomas G Martin; Carlos E Castro; Lumeng Ye; Jonathan H Esensten; Justin Eyquem; Alexander Marson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 68.164

2.  Validation Study to Determine the Accuracy of Widespread Promoterless EGFP Reporter at Assessing CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Homology Directed Repair.

Authors:  Wanqing Xu; Qingxia Zuo; Dongyan Feng; Changsheng He; Cailing Lin; Dongchao Huang; Yanbin Wan; Feng Chen; Guosheng Mo; Qi Sun; Hongli Du; Lizhen Huang
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.976

Review 3.  Understanding and overcoming adverse consequences of genome editing on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.

Authors:  Byung-Chul Lee; Richard J Lozano; Cynthia E Dunbar
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 11.454

4.  Optimization of AAV6 transduction enhances site-specific genome editing of primary human lymphocytes.

Authors:  Geoffrey L Rogers; Chun Huang; Robert D E Clark; Eduardo Seclén; Hsu-Yu Chen; Paula M Cannon
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 6.698

Review 5.  Challenges of CRISPR-Based Gene Editing in Primary T Cells.

Authors:  Alaleh Rezalotfi; Lea Fritz; Reinhold Förster; Berislav Bošnjak
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Double-tap gene drive uses iterative genome targeting to help overcome resistance alleles.

Authors:  Alena L Bishop; Víctor López Del Amo; Emily M Okamoto; Zsolt Bodai; Alexis C Komor; Valentino M Gantz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Recursive Editing improves homology-directed repair through retargeting of undesired outcomes.

Authors:  Lukas Möller; Eric J Aird; Markus S Schröder; Lena Kobel; Lucas Kissling; Lilly van de Venn; Jacob E Corn
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  Self-inactivating, all-in-one AAV vectors for precision Cas9 genome editing via homology-directed repair in vivo.

Authors:  Raed Ibraheim; Phillip W L Tai; Aamir Mir; Nida Javeed; Jiaming Wang; Tomás C Rodríguez; Suk Namkung; Samantha Nelson; Eraj Shafiq Khokhar; Esther Mintzer; Stacy Maitland; Zexiang Chen; Yueying Cao; Emmanouela Tsagkaraki; Scot A Wolfe; Dan Wang; Athma A Pai; Wen Xue; Guangping Gao; Erik J Sontheimer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 17.694

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.