| Literature DB >> 29396410 |
Luiz Carlos Caires-Júnior1, Ernesto Goulart1, Uirá Souto Melo1, Bruno Henrique Silva Araujo2,3, Lucas Alvizi1, Alessandra Soares-Schanoski4, Danyllo Felipe de Oliveira1, Gerson Shigeru Kobayashi1, Karina Griesi-Oliveira1,5, Camila Manso Musso1, Murilo Sena Amaral4, Lucas Ferreira daSilva6, Renato Mancini Astray4, Sandra Fernanda Suárez-Patiño4, Daniella Cristina Ventini4, Sérgio Gomes da Silva5,7, Guilherme Lopes Yamamoto1, Suzana Ezquina1, Michel Satya Naslavsky1, Kayque Alves Telles-Silva1, Karina Weinmann1, Vanessa van der Linden8, Helio van der Linden9, João Ricardo Mendes de Oliveira10, Nivia Maria Rodrigues Arrais11, Adriana Melo12, Thalita Figueiredo1, Silvana Santos13, Joanna Goes Castro Meira14, Saulo Duarte Passos15, Roque Pacheco de Almeida16, Ana Jovina Barreto Bispo16, Esper Abrão Cavalheiro3, Jorge Kalil4, Edécio Cunha-Neto17, Helder Nakaya18, Robert Andreata-Santos19, Luis Carlos de Souza Ferreira19, Sergio Verjovski-Almeida4,6, Paulo Lee Ho4, Maria Rita Passos-Bueno1, Mayana Zatz20.
Abstract
Congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) causes early brain development impairment by affecting neural progenitor cells (NPCs). Here, we analyze NPCs from three pairs of dizygotic twins discordant for CZS. We compare by RNA-Seq the NPCs derived from CZS-affected and CZS-unaffected twins. Prior to Zika virus (ZIKV) infection the NPCs from CZS babies show a significantly different gene expression signature of mTOR and Wnt pathway regulators, key to a neurodevelopmental program. Following ZIKV in vitro infection, cells from affected individuals have significantly higher ZIKV replication and reduced cell growth. Whole-exome analysis in 18 affected CZS babies as compared to 5 unaffected twins and 609 controls excludes a monogenic model to explain resistance or increased susceptibility to CZS development. Overall, our results indicate that CZS is not a stochastic event and depends on NPC intrinsic susceptibility, possibly related to oligogenic and/or epigenetic mechanisms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29396410 PMCID: PMC5797251 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02790-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Experiment design and hiPSC characterization. a Schematic: generation of neural progenitor cells (NPCs) from discordant twins’ hiPSCs following ZIKVBR infection and analysis. Silhouettes are courtesy of www.vecteezy.com (mother) and Yulia Ryabokon (babies). b, c Immunofluorescence for TRA-1-60 and OCT3/4 in hiPSCs. Scale bar, 20 μm. d MLPA analysis of subtelomeric imbalance chromosomal abnormalities in cultured hiPSCs cell lines using P070 and P036 MLPA Kits. e, f RT-qPCR analysis of hiPSCs for OCT3/4 and NANOG expression (mean ± SEM). g Representative discordant twins’ computed tomography (CT) scan images (a′, b′ [#10763-4]; e′, f′ [#10608-4]—non-affected babies; c′, d′ [#10763-1], g′, h′ [#10608-1]—affected babies). #10608 twins were 5 months old and #10763 were 15 months old when submitted to CT scan. White arrows show observed brain abnormalities (calcifications, ventriculomegaly, and cortical gyrus simplification). Scale bar, 3 cm. h Ventricular area analysis (cm2) (n = 4, two pairs of discordant twins). i Cortex thickness analysis (n = 4, two pairs of discordant twins). ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; mean ± SEM; Student’s t test
Fig. 2NPC characterization and ZIKVBR infection in DZ-D cells (see also Supplementary Fig. 1). a, b NPCs were stained with isotype IgG APC-A and isotype IgG FITC-A (a) and Nestin APC-A and Musashi-1 FITC-A (b) and were analyzed by flow cytometry to confirm (or show) population homogeneity for neural progenitor markers. c Nestin staining by immunofluorescence. Scale bar (SB), 20 μm d Representative phase-contrast micrograph of infected NPCs (#10608 twins). SB, 100 μm. e Analysis of cell number of Mock-infected NPCs from non-affected and CZS-affected twins (n = 3 technical replicates; mean ± SEM). f, g MOI 0.01 and 0.1 infected NPCs from non-affected (#10608-4, #10763-4, and #10788-4) (f) and CZS-affected (#10608-1, #10763-1, and #10788-1) (g) twins in monolayer cultures at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hpi (n = 3 technical replicates; mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc analysis). h Representative images of neurospheres infected with ZIKVBR (#10608 twins, n = 2 technical replicates). SB, 400 μm. i, j Normalized diameter of neurospheres at 24 and 96 hpi with MOI 0.01 (i) or MOI 0.1 (j); #10608, #10763 and #10788 twins; n ≅ 15 technical replicates; mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 Student’s t test
Fig. 3NPCs from affected twins increased susceptibility to ZIKVBR infection compared to the non-affected ones (see also Supplementary Fig. 2). a, b Viral copies in supernatant of NPCs infected at an MOI = 0.01 (a) or MOI 0.1 (b) as determined by RT-qPCR. Graphs show mean ± SEM of NPCs from #10608, #10763, and #10788 twins. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis. c, d Zika PFU/mL in NPCs supernatant (c) MOI = 0.01 and (d) MOI = 0.1; #10608, #10763, and #10788 twins; mean ± SEM; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis. e, f Zika staining in non-affected (e) and affected (f) twins at an MOI of 0.1 at 96 hpi; #10608, #10763, and #10788 twins. Scale bar = 20 µm. g MFI quantification at 96 hpi (MOI = 0.1; n ≅ 20 technical replicates per group; mean ± SEM; ***p < 0.001; Student’s t test). h Representation of a well stained with ZIKV collected from #10608 NPC supernatant at an MOI of 0.1 at 96 hpi
Fig. 4NPC gene expression analyses by RNA-Seq in cultured cells prior to ZIKV infection (see also Supplementary Fig. 3). a Heatmap representation and clusterization of top 20 most significant DEGs (p < 0.001; edgeR exact test) in NPCs in culture prior to ZIKV infection, in cells derived from non-affected (#10608-4, #10763-4, and #10788-4) and CZS-affected (#10608-1, #10763-1, and #10788-1) twins. Scale bar = Z score. b Enriched GO terms (p value < 0.0001, cumulative hypergeometric distribution). c Enriched GO terms interaction network. The thickness of the lines connecting the circles indicates the number of interactions between genes included in each GO term sub-category represented by each circle. d TSC2 activity analysis by multiplex array (#10608, #10763, and #10788 twins; mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05; Student's t test). e PFU/mL measurement in infected NPCs after bafilomycin/rapamycin treatment (#10608, #10763, and #10788 twins; mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; NS = not significant; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis)