Literature DB >> 29388561

Optimization of pillar electrodes in subretinal prosthesis for enhanced proximity to target neurons.

Thomas Flores1, Xin Lei, Tiffany Huang, Henri Lorach, Roopa Dalal, Ludwig Galambos, Theodore Kamins, Keith Mathieson, Daniel Palanker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: High-resolution prosthetic vision requires dense stimulating arrays with small electrodes. However, such miniaturization reduces electrode capacitance and penetration of electric field into tissue. We evaluate potential solutions to these problems with subretinal implants based on utilization of pillar electrodes. APPROACH: To study integration of three-dimensional (3D) implants with retinal tissue, we fabricated arrays with varying pillar diameter, pitch, and height, and implanted beneath the degenerate retina in rats (Royal College of Surgeons, RCS). Tissue integration was evaluated six weeks post-op using histology and whole-mount confocal fluorescence imaging. The electric field generated by various electrode configurations was calculated in COMSOL, and stimulation thresholds assessed using a model of network-mediated retinal response. MAIN
RESULTS: Retinal tissue migrated into the space between pillars with no visible gliosis in 90% of implanted arrays. Pillars with 10 μm height reached the middle of the inner nuclear layer (INL), while 22 μm pillars reached the upper portion of the INL. Electroplated pillars with dome-shaped caps increase the active electrode surface area. Selective deposition of sputtered iridium oxide onto the cap ensures localization of the current injection to the pillar top, obviating the need to insulate the pillar sidewall. According to computational model, pillars having a cathodic return electrode above the INL and active anodic ring electrode at the surface of the implant would enable six times lower stimulation threshold, compared to planar arrays with circumferential return, but suffer from greater cross-talk between the neighboring pixels. SIGNIFICANCE: 3D electrodes in subretinal prostheses help reduce electrode-tissue separation and decrease stimulation thresholds to enable smaller pixels, and thereby improve visual acuity of prosthetic vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29388561      PMCID: PMC6503528          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aaac39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  41 in total

1.  Strength-duration relationship for extracellular neural stimulation: numerical and analytical models.

Authors:  David Boinagrov; Jim Loudin; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Design of a high-resolution optoelectronic retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Daniel Palanker; Alexander Vankov; Phil Huie; Stephen Baccus
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  A Retinal Prosthesis Technology Based on CMOS Microelectronics and Microwire Glass Electrodes.

Authors:  D Scribner; L Johnson; P Skeath; R Klein; D Ilg; L Wasserman; N Fernandez; W Freeman; J Peele; F K Perkins; E J Friebele; W E Bassett; J G Howard; W Krebs
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.833

4.  Three-dimensional electrode arrays for retinal prostheses: modeling, geometry optimization and experimental validation.

Authors:  M Djilas; C Olès; H Lorach; A Bendali; J Dégardin; E Dubus; G Lissorgues-Bazin; L Rousseau; R Benosman; S-H Ieng; S Joucla; B Yvert; P Bergonzo; J Sahel; S Picaud
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Selectivity of direct and network-mediated stimulation of the retinal ganglion cells with epi-, sub- and intraretinal electrodes.

Authors:  David Boinagrov; Susanne Pangratz-Fuehrer; Georges Goetz; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Optimization of return electrodes in neurostimulating arrays.

Authors:  Thomas Flores; Georges Goetz; Xin Lei; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  On the computation of a retina resistivity profile for applications in multi-scale modeling of electrical stimulation and absorption.

Authors:  Kyle Loizos; Anil Kumar RamRakhyani; James Anderson; Robert Marc; Gianluca Lazzi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Improving the spatial resolution of epiretinal implants by increasing stimulus pulse duration.

Authors:  Andrew C Weitz; Devyani Nanduri; Matthew R Behrend; Alejandra Gonzalez-Calle; Robert J Greenberg; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Photovoltaic retinal prosthesis: implant fabrication and performance.

Authors:  Lele Wang; K Mathieson; T I Kamins; J D Loudin; L Galambos; G Goetz; A Sher; Y Mandel; P Huie; D Lavinsky; J S Harris; D V Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Modeling the response of ON and OFF retinal bipolar cells during electric stimulation.

Authors:  P Werginz; H Benav; E Zrenner; F Rattay
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  14 in total

1.  Vertically integrated photo junction-field-effect transistor pixels for retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Samir Damle; Yu-Hsin Liu; Shaurya Arya; Nicholas W Oesch; Yu-Hwa Lo
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Restoring vision at the fovea.

Authors:  Juliette E McGregor
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2019-11-08

3.  Pixel size limit of the PRIMA implants: from humans to rodents and back.

Authors:  Bing-Yi Wang; Zhijie Charles Chen; Mohajeet Bhuckory; Anna Kochnev Goldstein; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 4.  Photogenerated Electrical Fields for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Giuseppina Polino; Claudia Lubrano; Giuseppe Ciccone; Francesca Santoro
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-11-09

5.  Honeycomb-shaped electro-neural interface enables cellular-scale pixels in subretinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Thomas Flores; Tiffany Huang; Mohajeet Bhuckory; Elton Ho; Zhijie Chen; Roopa Dalal; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore Kamins; Keith Mathieson; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Recent Progress in Wireless Sensors for Wearable Electronics.

Authors:  Young-Geun Park; Sangil Lee; Jang-Ung Park
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Fabrication of Subretinal 3D Microelectrodes with Hexagonal Arrangement.

Authors:  Hee Won Seo; Namju Kim; Sohee Kim
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  Characteristics of prosthetic vision in rats with subretinal flat and pillar electrode arrays.

Authors:  Elton Ho; Xin Lei; Thomas Flores; Henri Lorach; Tiffany Huang; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore Kamins; James Harris; Keith Mathieson; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Implantation and Extraction of Penetrating Electrode Arrays in Minipig Retinas.

Authors:  Jinghua Chen; Vasiliki Poulaki; Seong-Joon Kim; William D Eldred; Sheryl Kane; Marcus Gingerich; Douglas B Shire; Ralph Jensen; Gloria DeWalt; Henry J Kaplan; Joseph F Rizzo
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 10.  Stimulation Strategies for Improving the Resolution of Retinal Prostheses.

Authors:  Wei Tong; Hamish Meffin; David J Garrett; Michael R Ibbotson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.