Literature DB >> 27098048

Optimization of return electrodes in neurostimulating arrays.

Thomas Flores1, Georges Goetz, Xin Lei, Daniel Palanker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: High resolution visual prostheses require dense stimulating arrays with localized inputs of individual electrodes. We study the electric field produced by multielectrode arrays in electrolyte to determine an optimal configuration of return electrodes and activation sequence. APPROACH: To determine the boundary conditions for computation of the electric field in electrolyte, we assessed current dynamics using an equivalent circuit of a multielectrode array with interleaved return electrodes. The electric field modeled with two different boundary conditions derived from the equivalent circuit was then compared to measurements of electric potential in electrolyte. To assess the effect of return electrode configuration on retinal stimulation, we transformed the computed electric fields into retinal response using a model of neural network-mediated stimulation. MAIN
RESULTS: Electric currents at the capacitive electrode-electrolyte interface redistribute over time, so that boundary conditions transition from equipotential surfaces at the beginning of the pulse to uniform current density in steady state. Experimental measurements confirmed that, in steady state, the boundary condition corresponds to a uniform current density on electrode surfaces. Arrays with local return electrodes exhibit improved field confinement and can elicit stronger network-mediated retinal response compared to those with a common remote return. Connecting local return electrodes enhances the field penetration depth and allows reducing the return electrode area. Sequential activation of the pixels in large monopolar arrays reduces electrical cross-talk and improves the contrast in pattern stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE: Accurate modeling of multielectrode arrays helps optimize the electrode configuration to maximize the spatial resolution, contrast and dynamic range of retinal prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27098048      PMCID: PMC6519450          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/3/036010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  11 in total

1.  Vertically integrated photo junction-field-effect transistor pixels for retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Samir Damle; Yu-Hsin Liu; Shaurya Arya; Nicholas W Oesch; Yu-Hwa Lo
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Epiretinal stimulation with local returns enhances selectivity at cellular resolution.

Authors:  Victoria H Fan; Lauren E Grosberg; Sasidhar S Madugula; Pawel Hottowy; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alexander Sher; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 3.  Electronic approaches to restoration of sight.

Authors:  G A Goetz; D V Palanker
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2016-08-09

4.  Optimization of pillar electrodes in subretinal prosthesis for enhanced proximity to target neurons.

Authors:  Thomas Flores; Xin Lei; Tiffany Huang; Henri Lorach; Roopa Dalal; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore Kamins; Keith Mathieson; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Fractal Electrodes as a Generic Interface for Stimulating Neurons.

Authors:  W J Watterson; R D Montgomery; R P Taylor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Honeycomb-shaped electro-neural interface enables cellular-scale pixels in subretinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Thomas Flores; Tiffany Huang; Mohajeet Bhuckory; Elton Ho; Zhijie Chen; Roopa Dalal; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore Kamins; Keith Mathieson; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Characteristics of prosthetic vision in rats with subretinal flat and pillar electrode arrays.

Authors:  Elton Ho; Xin Lei; Thomas Flores; Henri Lorach; Tiffany Huang; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore Kamins; James Harris; Keith Mathieson; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Protuberant Electrode Structures for Subretinal Electrical Stimulation: Modeling, Fabrication and in vivo Evaluation.

Authors:  Pedro González Losada; Lionel Rousseau; Marjorie Grzeskowiak; Manon Valet; Diep Nguyen; Julie Dégardin; Elisabeth Dubus; Serge Picaud; Gaelle Lissorgues
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 9.  Stimulation Strategies for Improving the Resolution of Retinal Prostheses.

Authors:  Wei Tong; Hamish Meffin; David J Garrett; Michael R Ibbotson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Spatiotemporal integration of visual stimuli and its relevance to the use of a divisional power supply scheme for retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Yueh-Chun Tsai; José Jiun-Shian Wu; Po-Kang Lin; Bo-Jyun Lin; Pin-Shiou Wang; Ching-Hsiang Liu; Chung-Yu Wu; Chuan-Chin Chiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.