OBJECTIVE: Intra-retinal placement of stimulating electrodes can provide close and stable proximity to target neurons. We assessed improvement in stimulation thresholds and selectivity of the direct and network-mediated retinal stimulation with intraretinal electrodes, compared to epiretinal and subretinal placements. APPROACH: Stimulation thresholds of the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in wild-type rat retina were measured using the patch-clamp technique. Direct and network-mediated responses were discriminated using various synaptic blockers. MAIN RESULTS: Three types of RGC responses were identified: short latency (SL, τ < 5 ms) originating in RGCs, medium latency (ML, 3 < τ < 70 ms) originating in the inner nuclear layer and long latency (LL, τ > 40 ms) originating in photoreceptors. Cathodic epiretinal stimulation exhibited the lowest threshold for direct RGC response and the highest direct selectivity (network/direct thresholds ratio), exceeding a factor of 3 with pulse durations below 0.5 ms. For network-mediated stimulation, the lowest threshold was obtained with anodic pulses in OPL position, and its network selectivity (direct/network thresholds ratio) increased with pulse duration, exceeding a factor of 4 at 10 ms. Latency of all three types of responses decreased with increasing strength of the stimulus. SIGNIFICANCE: These results define the optimal range of pulse durations, pulse polarities and electrode placement for the retinal prostheses aiming at direct or network-mediated stimulation of RGCs.
OBJECTIVE: Intra-retinal placement of stimulating electrodes can provide close and stable proximity to target neurons. We assessed improvement in stimulation thresholds and selectivity of the direct and network-mediated retinal stimulation with intraretinal electrodes, compared to epiretinal and subretinal placements. APPROACH: Stimulation thresholds of the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in wild-type rat retina were measured using the patch-clamp technique. Direct and network-mediated responses were discriminated using various synaptic blockers. MAIN RESULTS: Three types of RGC responses were identified: short latency (SL, τ < 5 ms) originating in RGCs, medium latency (ML, 3 < τ < 70 ms) originating in the inner nuclear layer and long latency (LL, τ > 40 ms) originating in photoreceptors. Cathodic epiretinal stimulation exhibited the lowest threshold for direct RGC response and the highest direct selectivity (network/direct thresholds ratio), exceeding a factor of 3 with pulse durations below 0.5 ms. For network-mediated stimulation, the lowest threshold was obtained with anodic pulses in OPL position, and its network selectivity (direct/network thresholds ratio) increased with pulse duration, exceeding a factor of 4 at 10 ms. Latency of all three types of responses decreased with increasing strength of the stimulus. SIGNIFICANCE: These results define the optimal range of pulse durations, pulse polarities and electrode placement for the retinal prostheses aiming at direct or network-mediated stimulation of RGCs.
Authors: J F Rizzo; J Wyatt; M Humayun; E de Juan; W Liu; A Chow; R Eckmiller; E Zrenner; T Yagi; G Abrams Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: J D Loudin; D M Simanovskii; K Vijayraghavan; C K Sramek; A F Butterwick; P Huie; G Y McLean; D V Palanker Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2007-02-26 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: U Schraermeyer; G Thumann; T Luther; N Kociok; S Armhold; K Kruttwig; C Andressen; K Addicks; K U Bartz-Schmidt Journal: Cell Transplant Date: 2001 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Dorsa Haji Ghaffari; Kathleen E Finn; V Swetha E Jeganathan; Uday Patel; Varalakshmi Wuyyuru; Arup Roy; James D Weiland Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Georges Goetz; Richard Smith; Xin Lei; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore Kamins; Keith Mathieson; Alexander Sher; Daniel Palanker Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Mike D Menz; Patrick Ye; Kamyar Firouzi; Amin Nikoozadeh; Kim Butts Pauly; Pierre Khuri-Yakub; Stephen A Baccus Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Lauren E Grosberg; Karthik Ganesan; Georges A Goetz; Sasidhar S Madugula; Nandita Bhaskhar; Victoria Fan; Peter Li; Pawel Hottowy; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alexander Sher; Alan M Litke; Subhasish Mitra; E J Chichilnisky Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Morven A Cameron; Amr Al Abed; Yossi Buskila; Socrates Dokos; Nigel H Lovell; John W Morley Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Henri Lorach; Xin Lei; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore Kamins; Keith Mathieson; Roopa Dalal; Philip Huie; James Harris; Daniel Palanker Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Young Jun Yoon; Jae-Ik Lee; Ye Ji Jang; Seungki An; Jae Hun Kim; Shelley I Fried; Maesoon Im Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 3.802