Literature DB >> 36044878

Pixel size limit of the PRIMA implants: from humans to rodents and back.

Bing-Yi Wang1, Zhijie Charles Chen2, Mohajeet Bhuckory3,4, Anna Kochnev Goldstein2, Daniel Palanker3,4.   

Abstract

Objective.Retinal prostheses aim at restoring sight in patients with retinal degeneration by electrically stimulating the inner retinal neurons. Clinical trials with patients blinded by atrophic age-related macular degeneration using the PRIMA subretinal implant, a 2 × 2 mm array of 100µm-wide photovoltaic pixels, have demonstrated a prosthetic visual acuity closely matching the pixel size. Further improvement in resolution requires smaller pixels, which, with the current bipolar design, necessitates more intense stimulation.Approach.We examine the lower limit of the pixel size for PRIMA implants by modeling the electric field, leveraging the clinical benchmarks, and using animal data to assess the stimulation strength and contrast of various patterns. Visually evoked potentials measured in Royal College of Surgeons rats with photovoltaic implants composed of 100µm and 75µm pixels were compared to clinical thresholds with 100µm pixels. Electrical stimulation model calibrated by the clinical and rodent data was used to predict the performance of the implant with smaller pixels.Main results.PRIMA implants with 75µm bipolar pixels under the maximum safe near-infrared (880 nm) illumination of 8 mW mm-2with 30% duty cycle (10 ms pulses at 30 Hz) should provide a similar perceptual brightness as with 100µm pixels under 3 mW mm-2irradiance, used in the current clinical trials. Contrast of the Landolt C pattern scaled down to 75µm pixels is also similar under such illumination to that with 100µm pixels, increasing the maximum acuity from 20/420 to 20/315.Significance.Computational modeling defines the minimum pixel size of the PRIMA implants as 75µm. Increasing the implant width from 2 to 3 mm and reducing the pixel size from 100 to 75µm will nearly quadrupole the number of pixels, which should be very beneficial for patients. Smaller pixels of the same bipolar flat geometry would require excessively intense illumination, and therefore a different pixel design should be considered for further improvement in resolution.
© 2022 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electrophysiology; neural stimulation; photovoltaic; restoration of sight; retinal prosthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36044878      PMCID: PMC9527086          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac8e31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.043


  25 in total

1.  Morphometric analysis of the macula in eyes with geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  S Y Kim; S Sadda; M S Humayun; E de Juan; B M Melia; W R Green
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis.

Authors:  A Santos; M S Humayun; E de Juan; R J Greenburg; M J Marsh; I B Klock; A H Milam
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-04

3.  Selectivity of direct and network-mediated stimulation of the retinal ganglion cells with epi-, sub- and intraretinal electrodes.

Authors:  David Boinagrov; Susanne Pangratz-Fuehrer; Georges Goetz; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Calcium currents and calcium signaling in rod bipolar cells of rat retinal slices.

Authors:  D A Protti; I Llano
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Highest reported visual acuity after electronic retinal implantation.

Authors:  Jasmina Cehajic Kapetanovic; Nicole Troelenberg; Thomas L Edwards; Kanmin Xue; James D Ramsden; Alfred Stett; Eberhart Zrenner; Robert E MacLaren
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.761

6.  Epidemiology of retinitis pigmentosa in Denmark.

Authors:  Marianne Haim
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl       Date:  2002

7.  Long-Term Results from an Epiretinal Prosthesis to Restore Sight to the Blind.

Authors:  Allen C Ho; Mark S Humayun; Jessy D Dorn; Lyndon da Cruz; Gislin Dagnelie; James Handa; Pierre-Olivier Barale; José-Alain Sahel; Paulo E Stanga; Farhad Hafezi; Avinoam B Safran; Joel Salzmann; Arturo Santos; David Birch; Rand Spencer; Artur V Cideciyan; Eugene de Juan; Jacque L Duncan; Dean Eliott; Amani Fawzi; Lisa C Olmos de Koo; Gary C Brown; Julia A Haller; Carl D Regillo; Lucian V Del Priore; Aries Arditi; Duane R Geruschat; Robert J Greenberg
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States.

Authors:  David S Friedman; Benita J O'Colmain; Beatriz Muñoz; Sandra C Tomany; Cathy McCarty; Paulus T V M de Jong; Barbara Nemesure; Paul Mitchell; John Kempen
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04

9.  Interim Results of a Multicenter Trial with the New Electronic Subretinal Implant Alpha AMS in 15 Patients Blind from Inherited Retinal Degenerations.

Authors:  Katarina Stingl; Ruth Schippert; Karl U Bartz-Schmidt; Dorothea Besch; Charles L Cottriall; Thomas L Edwards; Florian Gekeler; Udo Greppmaier; Katja Kiel; Assen Koitschev; Laura Kühlewein; Robert E MacLaren; James D Ramsden; Johann Roider; Albrecht Rothermel; Helmut Sachs; Greta S Schröder; Jan Tode; Nicole Troelenberg; Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Simultaneous perception of prosthetic and natural vision in AMD patients.

Authors:  D Palanker; Y Le Mer; S Mohand-Said; J A Sahel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.