Literature DB >> 22791690

Photovoltaic retinal prosthesis: implant fabrication and performance.

Lele Wang1, K Mathieson, T I Kamins, J D Loudin, L Galambos, G Goetz, A Sher, Y Mandel, P Huie, D Lavinsky, J S Harris, D V Palanker.   

Abstract

The objective of this work is to develop and test a photovoltaic retinal prosthesis for restoring sight to patients blinded by degenerative retinal diseases. A silicon photodiode array for subretinal stimulation has been fabricated by a silicon-integrated-circuit/MEMS process. Each pixel in the two-dimensional array contains three series-connected photodiodes, which photovoltaically convert pulsed near-infrared light into bi-phasic current to stimulate nearby retinal neurons without wired power connections. The device thickness is chosen to be 30 µm to absorb a significant portion of light while still being thin enough for subretinal implantation. Active and return electrodes confine current near each pixel and are sputter coated with iridium oxide to enhance charge injection levels and provide a stable neural interface. Pixels are separated by 5 µm wide trenches to electrically isolate them and to allow nutrient diffusion through the device. Three sizes of pixels (280, 140 and 70 µm) with active electrodes of 80, 40 and 20 µm diameter were fabricated. The turn-on voltages of the one-diode, two-series-connected diode and three-series-connected diode structures are approximately 0.6, 1.2 and 1.8 V, respectively. The measured photo-responsivity per diode at 880 nm wavelength is ∼0.36 A W(-1), at zero voltage bias and scales with the exposed silicon area. For all three pixel sizes, the reverse-bias dark current is sufficiently low (<100 pA) for our application. Pixels of all three sizes reliably elicit retinal responses at safe near-infrared light irradiances, with good acceptance of the photodiode array in the subretinal space. The fabricated device delivers efficient retinal stimulation at safe near-infrared light irradiances without any wired power connections, which greatly simplifies the implantation procedure. Presence of the return electrodes in each pixel helps to localize the current, and thereby improves resolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22791690      PMCID: PMC3419261          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/9/4/046014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  31 in total

1.  Retinal prosthesis: an encouraging first decade with major challenges ahead.

Authors:  J F Rizzo; J Wyatt; M Humayun; E de Juan; W Liu; A Chow; R Eckmiller; E Zrenner; T Yagi; G Abrams
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Electrical multisite stimulation of the isolated chicken retina.

Authors:  A Stett; W Barth; S Weiss; H Haemmerle; E Zrenner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Optoelectronic retinal prosthesis: system design and performance.

Authors:  J D Loudin; D M Simanovskii; K Vijayraghavan; C K Sramek; A F Butterwick; P Huie; G Y McLean; D V Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Photodiode circuits for retinal prostheses.

Authors:  J D Loudin; S F Cogan; K Mathieson; A Sher; D V Palanker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.833

5.  Blind subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis are able to improve performance in a spatial-motor task.

Authors:  A K Ahuja; J D Dorn; A Caspi; M J McMahon; G Dagnelie; L Dacruz; P Stanga; M S Humayun; R J Greenberg
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Neuroprotective effect of subretinal implants in the RCS rat.

Authors:  Machelle T Pardue; Michael J Phillips; Hang Yin; Brian D Sippy; Sarah Webb-Wood; Alan Y Chow; Sherry L Ball
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 7.  Retinal prosthesis for the blind.

Authors:  Eyal Margalit; Mauricio Maia; James D Weiland; Robert J Greenberg; Gildo Y Fujii; Gustavo Torres; Duke V Piyathaisere; Thomas M O'Hearn; Wentai Liu; Gianluca Lazzi; Gislin Dagnelie; Dean A Scribner; Eugene de Juan; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

8.  Effect of shape and coating of a subretinal prosthesis on its integration with the retina.

Authors:  A Butterwick; P Huie; B W Jones; R E Marc; M Marmor; D Palanker
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 3.467

9.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words.

Authors:  Eberhart Zrenner; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Heval Benav; Dorothea Besch; Anna Bruckmann; Veit-Peter Gabel; Florian Gekeler; Udo Greppmaier; Alex Harscher; Steffen Kibbel; Johannes Koch; Akos Kusnyerik; Tobias Peters; Katarina Stingl; Helmut Sachs; Alfred Stett; Peter Szurman; Barbara Wilhelm; Robert Wilke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  Neural remodeling in retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Robert E Marc; Bryan W Jones; Carl B Watt; Enrica Strettoi
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 21.198

View more
  46 in total

1.  Contrast Sensitivity With a Subretinal Prosthesis and Implications for Efficient Delivery of Visual Information.

Authors:  Georges Goetz; Richard Smith; Xin Lei; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore Kamins; Keith Mathieson; Alexander Sher; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Retinal safety of near infrared radiation in photovoltaic restoration of sight.

Authors:  H Lorach; J Wang; D Y Lee; R Dalal; P Huie; D Palanker
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Performance of photovoltaic arrays in-vivo and characteristics of prosthetic vision in animals with retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Henri Lorach; Georges Goetz; Yossi Mandel; Xin Lei; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore I Kamins; Keith Mathieson; Philip Huie; Roopa Dalal; James S Harris; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Integration of Perforated Subretinal Prostheses With Retinal Tissue.

Authors:  Adewumi N Adekunle; Alice Adkins; Wei Wang; Henry J Kaplan; Juan Fernandez de Castro; Sang Joon Lee; Philip Huie; Daniel Palanker; Maureen McCall; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  SiC protective coating for photovoltaic retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Xin Lei; Sheryl Kane; Stuart Cogan; Henri Lorach; Ludwig Galambos; Philip Huie; Keith Mathieson; Theodore Kamins; James Harris; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 6.  Recent advances in bioelectronics chemistry.

Authors:  Yin Fang; Lingyuan Meng; Aleksander Prominski; Erik N Schaumann; Matthew Seebald; Bozhi Tian
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 54.564

7.  Spatiotemporal characteristics of retinal response to network-mediated photovoltaic stimulation.

Authors:  Elton Ho; Richard Smith; Georges Goetz; Xin Lei; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore I Kamins; James Harris; Keith Mathieson; Daniel Palanker; Alexander Sher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Holographic display system for restoration of sight to the blind.

Authors:  G A Goetz; Y Mandel; R Manivanh; D V Palanker; T Čižmár
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Interactions of Prosthetic and Natural Vision in Animals With Local Retinal Degeneration.

Authors:  Henri Lorach; Xin Lei; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore Kamins; Keith Mathieson; Roopa Dalal; Philip Huie; James Harris; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 10.  [Visual prostheses].

Authors:  P Walter
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.