Literature DB >> 29383278

Variable Bone Density of Scaphoid: Importance of Subchondral Screw Placement.

Morgan M Swanstrom1, Kyle W Morse1, Joseph D Lipman1, Krystle A Hearns1, Michelle G Carlson1.   

Abstract

Background  Ideal internal fixation of the scaphoid relies on adequate bone stock for screw purchase; so, knowledge of regional bone density of the scaphoid is crucial. Questions/Purpose  The purpose of this study was to evaluate regional variations in scaphoid bone density. Materials and Methods  Three-dimensional CT models of fractured scaphoids were created and sectioned into proximal/distal segments and then into quadrants (volar/dorsal/radial/ulnar). Concentric shells in the proximal and distal pole were constructed in 2-mm increments moving from exterior to interior. Bone density was measured in Hounsfield units (HU). Results  Bone density of the distal scaphoid (453.2 ± 70.8 HU) was less than the proximal scaphoid (619.8 ± 124.2 HU). There was no difference in bone density between the four quadrants in either pole. In both the poles, the first subchondral shell was the densest. In both the proximal and distal poles, bone density decreased significantly in all three deeper shells. Conclusion  The proximal scaphoid had a greater density than the distal scaphoid. Within the poles, there was no difference in bone density between the quadrants. The subchondral 2-mm shell had the greatest density. Bone density dropped off significantly between the first and second shell in both the proximal and distal scaphoids. Clinical Relevance  In scaphoid fracture ORIF, optimal screw placement engages the subchondral 2-mm shell, especially in the distal pole, which has an overall lower bone density, and the second shell has only two-third the density of the first shell.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hounsfield units; bone density; scaphoid; subchondral

Year:  2017        PMID: 29383278      PMCID: PMC5788749          DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1605381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wrist Surg        ISSN: 2163-3916


  21 in total

1.  Effect of bone quality on the forces generated by compression screws.

Authors:  K J Faran; N Ichioka; M A Trzeciak; S Han; J Medige; O J Moy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Force distribution through the wrist joint in patients with different stages of Kienböck's disease: using computed tomography osteoabsorptiometry.

Authors:  N Iwasaki; A Minami; T Miyazawa; K Kaneda
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan.

Authors:  M R Norton; C Gamble
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Bone mineral density and bone histomorphometry are statistically related.

Authors:  Marzio Todisco; Paolo Trisi
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Bone mineral content and mechanical strength. An ex vivo study on human femora at autopsy.

Authors:  A Alho; T Husby; A Høiseth
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Force and pressure transmission through the normal wrist. A theoretical two-dimensional study in the posteroanterior plane.

Authors:  F Schuind; W P Cooney; R L Linscheid; K N An; E Y Chao
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening - Gleaning Additional Information from Diagnostic Wrist CT Scans.

Authors:  Joseph J Schreiber; Elizabeth B Gausden; Paul A Anderson; Michelle G Carlson; Andrew J Weiland
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Increased radiodensity of the proximal pole of the scaphoid: a common finding in computed tomography imaging of the wrist.

Authors:  Yvonne Y Cheung; Scott R Naspinsky; Douglas W Goodwin; James M Murphy; John T Nutting
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 9.  Surgical compared with conservative treatment for acute nondisplaced or minimally displaced scaphoid fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Geert A Buijze; Job N Doornberg; John S Ham; David Ring; Mohit Bhandari; Rudolf W Poolman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Predicting cancellous bone failure during screw insertion.

Authors:  Karen J Reynolds; Tammy M Cleek; Aaron A Mohtar; Trevor C Hearn
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  2 in total

1.  Factors Associated with Scaphoid Nonunion following Early Open Reduction and Internal Fixation.

Authors:  Pooja Prabhakar; Lauren Wessel; Joseph Nguyen; Jeffrey Stepan; Michelle Carlson; Duretti Fufa
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2020-01-20

2.  Which Headless Compression Screw Produces the Highest Interfragmentary Compression Force in Scaphoid Fracture?

Authors:  Karthik Vishwanathan; Ravi Patel; Sumedh Talwalkar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 1.251

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.