Literature DB >> 7775494

Force and pressure transmission through the normal wrist. A theoretical two-dimensional study in the posteroanterior plane.

F Schuind1, W P Cooney, R L Linscheid, K N An, E Y Chao.   

Abstract

Force transmission through the wrist in the normal population was investigated using the rigid body spring modeling (RBSM) technique (assuming carpal bones are rigid bodies interposed by series of springs simulating articulating cartilage and constraining ligaments). One-hundred and twenty normal wrist posteroanterior X-rays of adults (evenly divided to represent both genders and two age groups) provided the anatomical data. Reaction forces between the carpal bones were modeled using a system of compression linear springs, representing cartilage and subchondral bone, and of tensile linear springs, representing ligaments. The spring constants were determined based on the material properties of wrist cartilage and ligaments. Assumed axial loads were applied along the metacarpals to simulate a grasp strength of 10 N with active stabilization of the wrist in neutral position. The force transmission ratio at the radio-ulno-carpal joint was 55% through the radio-scaphoid and 35% through the radio-lunate joints. The remaining 10% of the load was passing through the triangular fibrocartilage with minor differences between genders. Among the intercarpal joints, a large percentage of the load of the wrist was transmitted to the scaphoid. The peak pressure was highest at the proximal pole of the radio-scaphoid, with a radio-scaphoid versus radio-lunate peak pressure ratio of 1.6. The most important ligaments in terms of load transmission were those opposing ulnar translation of the carpus. The wrist morphology had little influence on the magnitude and pattern of load distribution. There was no effect of age on wrist force distribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7775494     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)00093-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  25 in total

Review 1.  [Prosthetic surgery for the rheumatoid hand].

Authors:  K Schmidt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Patient Age and Hip Morphology Alter Joint Mechanics in Computational Models of Patients With Hip Dysplasia.

Authors:  Holly D Thomas-Aitken; Jessica E Goetz; Kevin N Dibbern; Robert W Westermann; Michael C Willey; Timothy S Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The modern history of the wrist.

Authors:  William P Cooney
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2012-11

4.  The mechanical axes of the wrist are oriented obliquely to the anatomical axes.

Authors:  Joseph J Crisco; Wendell M R Heard; Ryan R Rich; David J Paller; Scott W Wolfe
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Females Are Not Proportionally Smaller Males: Relationships Between Radius Anthropometrics and Their Sex Differences.

Authors:  Mitchell L Thom; Katherine Willmore; Alexandra Surugiu; Emily Lalone; Timothy A Burkhart
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-02-28

6.  Triquetral autograft for restoration of the lunate fossa of the distal radius: a case report.

Authors:  John T Capo; Qasim Husain; Joseph S Pyun; Jared S Preston; Ben Shamian; Tosca Kinchelow
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2011-09-09

7.  Biomechanical analysis of the wrist arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  M N Bajuri; Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir; Malliga Raman Murali; T Kamarul
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Volar/dorsal compressive mechanical behavior of the transverse carpal ligament.

Authors:  Erin K Main; Jessica E Goetz; Thomas E Baer; Noelle F Klocke; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Computationally efficient magnetic resonance imaging based surface contact modeling as a tool to evaluate joint injuries and outcomes of surgical interventions compared to finite element modeling.

Authors:  Joshua E Johnson; Phil Lee; Terence E McIff; E Bruce Toby; Kenneth J Fischer
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Three-dimensional stiffness of the carpal arch.

Authors:  Joseph N Gabra; Zong-Ming Li
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.