BACKGROUND: Although screening for and treating osteoporosis can prevent subsequent fractures, the rates of such interventions are low following a distal radial fracture. One potential method for identifying metabolic bone disease is via Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements from diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans. We hypothesized that HU values of the distal aspect of the radius could be used to assess local bone quality and would be predictive of distal radial fracture risk, thereby allowing the identification of patients in need of further management. METHODS: Measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) were made for 100 patients on the basis of HU values of cancellous portions of the distal aspect of the radius, the ulnar head, and the capitate. The HU values in twenty-five male and twenty-five female patients with an acute distal radial fracture documented on CT were compared with those of age and sex-matched control patients who had a CT scan obtained for other indications. RESULTS: Among the control patients, HU values decreased as age increased. When assessed on the basis of sex, both male and female patients with a distal radial fracture had significantly lower regional BMD compared with nonfracture control patients. A distal radial HU value of 218 for females and 246 for males optimized sensitivity and specificity; values below this threshold were associated with an increased risk of distal radial fracture. CONCLUSIONS: HU measurements can be obtained from any diagnostic CT scan using modern software programs and can be obtained by physicians in the office setting with minimal effort and at no additional cost or radiation exposure to the patient. Regardless of imaging indications, we suggest that patients with HU values below the identified thresholds be considered for further metabolic bone disease work-up, such as additional imaging, laboratory assessments, the initiation of osteoporosis treatment, or appropriate referral.
BACKGROUND: Although screening for and treating osteoporosis can prevent subsequent fractures, the rates of such interventions are low following a distal radial fracture. One potential method for identifying metabolic bone disease is via Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements from diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans. We hypothesized that HU values of the distal aspect of the radius could be used to assess local bone quality and would be predictive of distal radial fracture risk, thereby allowing the identification of patients in need of further management. METHODS: Measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) were made for 100 patients on the basis of HU values of cancellous portions of the distal aspect of the radius, the ulnar head, and the capitate. The HU values in twenty-five male and twenty-five female patients with an acute distal radial fracture documented on CT were compared with those of age and sex-matched control patients who had a CT scan obtained for other indications. RESULTS: Among the control patients, HU values decreased as age increased. When assessed on the basis of sex, both male and female patients with a distal radial fracture had significantly lower regional BMD compared with nonfracture control patients. A distal radial HU value of 218 for females and 246 for males optimized sensitivity and specificity; values below this threshold were associated with an increased risk of distal radial fracture. CONCLUSIONS: HU measurements can be obtained from any diagnostic CT scan using modern software programs and can be obtained by physicians in the office setting with minimal effort and at no additional cost or radiation exposure to the patient. Regardless of imaging indications, we suggest that patients with HU values below the identified thresholds be considered for further metabolic bone disease work-up, such as additional imaging, laboratory assessments, the initiation of osteoporosis treatment, or appropriate referral.
Authors: Daniel L Christensen; Kyle E Nappo; Jared A Wolfe; Sean M Wade; Daniel I Brooks; Benjamin K Potter; Jonathan A Forsberg; Scott M Tintle Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Kimia G Ganjaei; Zachary M Soler; Elliott D Mappus; Mitchell L Worley; Nicholas R Rowan; Guilherme J M Garcia; Lois J Matthews; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert; Rodney J Schlosser Journal: Rhinology Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Joseph J Schreiber; Thomas J McQuillan; Eni Halilaj; Joseph J Crisco; Arnold-Peter Weiss; Tarpit Patel; Deborah Kenney; Amy L Ladd Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2017-10-11 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: James T Bernatz; Andrew E Brooks; Benjamin P Nguyen; Edward D Shin; Neil C Binkley; Paul A Anderson; Brian F Grogan Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Date: 2020-12-07
Authors: Min Kyun Na; Yu Deok Won; Choong Hyun Kim; Jae Min Kim; Jin Hwan Cheong; Je Il Ryu; Myung-Hoon Han Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 3.240