Marzio Todisco1, Paolo Trisi. 1. Biomaterials Clinical Research Association, Via San Silvestro 163/3, 65132 Pescara, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate how closely analysis of bone quality performed using the bone mineral density (BMD) values obtained by quantitative computerized tomography (QCT) reflected the histologic bone density. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients requiring implant therapy underwent CT scanning. Their data were processed using Image Master software, and the BMD was calculated by measuring the Hounsfield units and relating those values to a phantom (Calibration Phantom, Quantitative Technologies). Each patient wore a radiographic-surgical template in which titanium cylinders were placed as a drilling guide for preparation of the implant site. The mouth regions where the titanium guides were placed (on the CT images and in the patient's mouth) corresponded to the implant sites where the BMD was measured and where tissue specimens for histomorphometric analysis retrieved. Forty specimens measuring 6 mm in length and 2 mm in diameter were obtained. Histomorphometric analysis was performed by digitizing the images, which were subsequently analyzed using the image analysis software IAS 2000. The bone volume (BV) was calculated as a percentage by dividing the area occupied by the mineralized bone over the entire microscopic field. RESULTS: The results of the statistical analysis showed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.691 between the BV and BMD values, with a P value < 0.01, which was considered significant. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the use of QCT to assess the bone quality before implant placement to improve the planning of implant treatment.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate how closely analysis of bone quality performed using the bone mineral density (BMD) values obtained by quantitative computerized tomography (QCT) reflected the histologic bone density. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients requiring implant therapy underwent CT scanning. Their data were processed using Image Master software, and the BMD was calculated by measuring the Hounsfield units and relating those values to a phantom (Calibration Phantom, Quantitative Technologies). Each patient wore a radiographic-surgical template in which titanium cylinders were placed as a drilling guide for preparation of the implant site. The mouth regions where the titanium guides were placed (on the CT images and in the patient's mouth) corresponded to the implant sites where the BMD was measured and where tissue specimens for histomorphometric analysis retrieved. Forty specimens measuring 6 mm in length and 2 mm in diameter were obtained. Histomorphometric analysis was performed by digitizing the images, which were subsequently analyzed using the image analysis software IAS 2000. The bone volume (BV) was calculated as a percentage by dividing the area occupied by the mineralized bone over the entire microscopic field. RESULTS: The results of the statistical analysis showed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.691 between the BV and BMD values, with a P value < 0.01, which was considered significant. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the use of QCT to assess the bone quality before implant placement to improve the planning of implant treatment.
Authors: Thomas Wilhelm; Tim Stelzer; Susanne Wiegand; Christian Güldner; Afshin Teymoortash; Thomas Günzel; Rudolf Hagen Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2014-12-07 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Dominik Gruszka; Robert Herr; Hans Hely; Peer Hofmann; Daniela Klitscher; Alexander Hofmann; Pol Maria Rommens Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 3.240