Literature DB >> 29255339

Comprehension in Proficient Readers: The Nature of Individual Variation.

Erin M Freed1, Stephen T Hamilton1, Debra L Long1.   

Abstract

Individual-difference research on reading comprehension is challenging because reader characteristics are as correlated with each other as they are with comprehension. This study was conducted to determine which abilities are central to explaining comprehension and which are secondary to other abilities. A battery of psycholinguistic and cognitive tests was administered to community college and university students. Seven constructs were identified: word decoding, working-memory capacity (WMC), general reasoning, verbal fluency, perceptual speed, inhibition, and language experience. Only general reasoning and language experience had direct effects; these two variables accounted for as much variance in comprehension as did the complete set. Direct effects of WMC and decoding were found only when general reasoning and language experience were deleted from the models. The authors question the need to include WMC in our theories of variability in adult reading comprehension and highlight the need to understand precisely how vocabulary facilitates comprehension.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29255339      PMCID: PMC5731652          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  48 in total

Review 1.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Low working memory capacity is only spuriously related to poor reading comprehension.

Authors:  Julie A Van Dyke; Clinton L Johns; Anuenue Kukona
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-03-19

3.  Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution: readers vary in their use of plausibility information.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Chantel S Prat
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

4.  Managing Mental Representations During Narrative Comprehension.

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher; Rachel R W Robertson; Paola Palladino; Necia K Werner
Journal:  Discourse Process       Date:  2004-04

5.  Two Decades of Structure Building.

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Journal:  Discourse Process       Date:  1997-01

Review 6.  Long-term working memory.

Authors:  K A Ericsson; W Kintsch
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Name codes and features in the discrimination of letter forms.

Authors:  Y Y Yeh; C W Eriksen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-09

8.  A memory-retrieval view of discourse representation: The recollection and familiarity of text ideas.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Clinton L Johns; Eunike Jonathan
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012

9.  Experience and sentence processing: statistical learning and relative clause comprehension.

Authors:  Justine B Wells; Morten H Christiansen; David S Race; Daniel J Acheson; Maryellen C MacDonald
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading.

Authors:  David Braze; Leonard Katz; James S Magnuson; W Einar Mencl; Whitney Tabor; Julie A Van Dyke; Tao Gong; Clinton L Johns; Donald P Shankweiler
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2015-12-17
View more
  5 in total

1.  Individual differences in decoding skill, print exposure, and cortical structure in young adults.

Authors:  Clinton L Johns; Andrew A Jahn; Hannah R Jones; Dave Kush; Peter J Molfese; Julie A Van Dyke; James S Magnuson; Whitney Tabor; W Einar Mencl; Donald P Shankweiler; David Braze
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.331

2.  Validated tests for language research with university students whose native language is English: Tests of vocabulary, general knowledge, author recognition, and reading comprehension.

Authors:  Hanke Vermeiren; Aaron Vandendaele; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-05-16

3.  Bilinguals on the garden-path: Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Liv J Hoversten; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2021-04-08

4.  An Individual Differences Examination of the Relation between Reading Processes and Comprehension.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Erin M Freed
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2020-04-27

5.  Testing the validity of a self-report scale, author recognition test, and book counting as measures of lifetime exposure to print fiction.

Authors:  Lena Wimmer; Heather J Ferguson
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-03-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.