Literature DB >> 35578105

Validated tests for language research with university students whose native language is English: Tests of vocabulary, general knowledge, author recognition, and reading comprehension.

Hanke Vermeiren1, Aaron Vandendaele2, Marc Brysbaert3.   

Abstract

We present five studies aimed at developing an L1 vocabulary test for English-speaking university students. Such a test is useful as an indicator of crystallized intelligence and because vocabulary size correlates well with reading comprehension. In the first study, we tested 100 written words with four answer alternatives, based on Nation's Vocabulary Size Test. Analysis suggested two factors, which we interpreted as the possible existence of two types of difficult words: unknown words for general knowledge and unknown words for specialized knowledge. In Study 2, we attempted to develop a vocabulary test for each type of word, and these tests were then validated in Study 3. Since the test for general words proved too easy for the target population, we improved it in a fourth study by creating and testing more difficult items. Finally, a fifth study was conducted to validate the new test. Unexpectedly, Study 5 found a high correlation (r = .82) between the general knowledge vocabulary test and the specialized knowledge vocabulary test, suggesting that they measure the same latent factor, contrary to our initial assumption. Both tests have high reliability (r > .85) and correlate well (r > .4) with general knowledge, author recognition, and reading comprehension. In addition, a collection of other language tests was used and improved to verify the validity of the vocabulary tests. An exploratory factor analysis of all tests identified three factors (text comprehension, crystallized intelligence, and reading speed), with the vocabulary tests loading on the factor crystallized intelligence, which in turn correlates with reading comprehension. Structural equation modeling confirmed the interpretation.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Author Recognition Test; Crystallized intelligence; English vocabulary test; General knowledge test; Reading comprehension test

Year:  2022        PMID: 35578105     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01856-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  23 in total

1.  Beyond breadth: The contributions of vocabulary depth to reading comprehension among skilled readers.

Authors:  Katherine S Binder; Nicole Gilbert Cote; Cheryl Lee; Emily Bessette; Huong Vu
Journal:  J Res Read       Date:  2016-02-23

2.  Experience, aptitude and individual differences in native language ultimate attainment.

Authors:  Ewa Dąbrowska
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-06-07

3.  Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Paweł Mandera; Samantha F McCormick; Emmanuel Keuleers
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-04

4.  PageFocus: Using paradata to detect and prevent cheating on online achievement tests.

Authors:  Birk Diedenhofen; Jochen Musch
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-08

5.  Measuring Lexical Quality: The Role of Spelling Ability.

Authors:  Sally Andrews; Aaron Veldre; Indako E Clarke
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-12

6.  Comprehension in Proficient Readers: The Nature of Individual Variation.

Authors:  Erin M Freed; Stephen T Hamilton; Debra L Long
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Four Empirically Based Reasons Not to Administer Time-Limited Tests.

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher; Raechel N Soicher; Kathryn A Becker-Blease
Journal:  Transl Issues Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-06

8.  Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants.

Authors:  David J Hauser; Norbert Schwarz
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-03

9.  How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2019-07-19

10.  How Many Words Do We Know? Practical Estimates of Vocabulary Size Dependent on Word Definition, the Degree of Language Input and the Participant's Age.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Michaël Stevens; Paweł Mandera; Emmanuel Keuleers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.