Literature DB >> 33731983

An Individual Differences Examination of the Relation between Reading Processes and Comprehension.

Debra L Long1, Erin M Freed1.   

Abstract

Previous research has generally focused on understanding individual variation in either on-line processing or off-line comprehension even though some theories explicitly link difficulty in processing to comprehension problems. The goal of the current study was to examine individual variation in performance both during on-line and off-line reading measures. A battery of psycholinguistic and cognitive tests was administered to community college and university students. In addition, participants read texts in an eye-tracker and answered comprehension questions about them. Multi-level modeling was used to determine the individual-difference factors that modulated the relation between word-level characteristics (e.g., length, frequency, surprisal) and fixation durations. The analyses showed that language experience, decoding, and WMC interacted with word characteristics to influence fixation durations, whereas language experience and reasoning predicted comprehension. The results suggest that individual variation in processing does not map directly to variation in comprehension as some theories predict.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33731983      PMCID: PMC7959334          DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2020.1748633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Stud Read        ISSN: 1088-8438


  27 in total

1.  Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: the cognitive correlates of print exposure.

Authors:  K E Stanovich; A E Cunningham
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-01

2.  The importance of knowledge in vivid text memory: an individual-differences investigation of recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Chantel Prat; Clinton Johns; Phillip Morris; Eunike Jonathan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

3.  The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: critique of Just and Carpenter (1992)

Authors:  G S Waters; D Caplan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution [corrected].

Authors:  M C MacDonald; N J Pearlmutter; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Contributions of reader- and text-level characteristics to eye-movement patterns during passage reading.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Kazunaga Matsuki; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  A memory-retrieval view of discourse representation: The recollection and familiarity of text ideas.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Clinton L Johns; Eunike Jonathan
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012

7.  Word-Decoding Skill Interacts With Working Memory Capacity to Influence Inference Generation During Reading.

Authors:  Stephen Hamilton; Erin Freed; Debra L Long
Journal:  Read Res Q       Date:  2016-05-09

8.  Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention.

Authors:  Jennifer C McVay; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-08-29

9.  The activation of modality-specific representations during discourse processing.

Authors:  Christopher A Kurby; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Modeling the Relations Among Morphological Awareness Dimensions, Vocabulary Knowledge, and Reading Comprehension in Adult Basic Education Students.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Tighe; Christopher Schatschneider
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.