Literature DB >> 18426067

Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution: readers vary in their use of plausibility information.

Debra L Long1, Chantel S Prat.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the relation between individual differences in working memory capacity and differences in the efficiency of syntactic processing. In one experiment, readers comprehended sentences containing main-verb/reduced-relative ambiguities that all resolved to the reduced-relative interpretation. High-span (but not low-span) readers processed sentences more slowly when the sentences were biased to the preferred, main-verb interpretation than when they were biased to the reduced-relative interpretation. Moreover, high-span (but not low-span) readers used information about the plausibility of the different interpretations even though low-span readers appeared to possess the requisite knowledge. In Experiment 2, readers received intensive exposure to sentences with main-verb/reduced-relative ambiguities. Exposure enhanced low-span readers' use of plausibility information. Moreover, the effect of exposure generalized to sentences that were not included in the training materials.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18426067      PMCID: PMC2746917          DOI: 10.3758/mc.36.2.375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  18 in total

Review 1.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  D Caplan; G S Waters
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Comprehension skill and global coherence: a paradoxical picture of poor comprehenders' abilities.

Authors:  D L Long; J L Chong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Reassessing working memory: comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996).

Authors:  Maryellen C MacDonald; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity.

Authors:  M C MacDonald; M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Understanding and producing the reduced relative construction: Evidence from ratings, editing and corpora.

Authors:  Mary Hare; Michael K Tanenhaus; Ken McRae
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Steven Frisson; Keith Rayner; Martin J Pickering
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  What this construction needs is generalized.

Authors:  Michael P Kaschak
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

9.  Transfer effects across contextual and linguistic boundaries: evidence from poor readers.

Authors:  D C Bourassa; B A Levy; S Dowin; A Casey
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1998-10

10.  Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text.

Authors:  G E Raney; K Rayner
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1995-06
View more
  14 in total

1.  Low working memory capacity is only spuriously related to poor reading comprehension.

Authors:  Julie A Van Dyke; Clinton L Johns; Anuenue Kukona
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-03-19

2.  Working memory and the revision of syntactic and discourse ambiguities.

Authors:  William S Evans; David Caplan; Adam Ostrowski; Jennifer Michaud; Anthony J Guarino; Gloria Waters
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2014-12-08

3.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?

Authors:  Ariel N James; Scott H Fraundorf; Eun-Kyung Lee; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Individual differences in the neural basis of causal inferencing.

Authors:  Chantel S Prat; Robert A Mason; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Comprehension in Proficient Readers: The Nature of Individual Variation.

Authors:  Erin M Freed; Stephen T Hamilton; Debra L Long
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Evidence for Priming Across Intervening Sentences During On-Line Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Kristen M Tooley; Tamara Y Swaab; Megan A Boudewyn; Megan Zirnstein; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2014-01-01

7.  Exploring the neural dynamics underpinning individual differences in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Chantel S Prat; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Modulation of cortical activity during comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar text topics in speed reading and speed listening.

Authors:  Augusto Buchweitz; Robert A Mason; Gayane Meschyan; Timothy A Keller; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Implicit learning of structure occurs in parallel with lexically-mediated syntactic priming effects in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Kristen M Tooley; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Enhanced performance on a sentence comprehension task in congenitally blind adults.

Authors:  Rita Loiotile; Connor Lane; Akira Omaki; Marina Bedny
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.