Literature DB >> 29254443

Decision making and uncertainty quantification for individualized treatments using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees.

Brent R Logan1, Rodney Sparapani1, Robert E McCulloch2, Purushottam W Laud1.   

Abstract

Individualized treatment rules can improve health outcomes by recognizing that patients may respond differently to treatment and assigning therapy with the most desirable predicted outcome for each individual. Flexible and efficient prediction models are desired as a basis for such individualized treatment rules to handle potentially complex interactions between patient factors and treatment. Modern Bayesian semiparametric and nonparametric regression models provide an attractive avenue in this regard as these allow natural posterior uncertainty quantification of patient specific treatment decisions as well as the population wide value of the prediction-based individualized treatment rule. In addition, via the use of such models, inference is also available for the value of the optimal individualized treatment rules. We propose such an approach and implement it using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees as this model has been shown to perform well in fitting nonparametric regression functions to continuous and binary responses, even with many covariates. It is also computationally efficient for use in practice. With Bayesian Additive Regression Trees, we investigate a treatment strategy which utilizes individualized predictions of patient outcomes from Bayesian Additive Regression Trees models. Posterior distributions of patient outcomes under each treatment are used to assign the treatment that maximizes the expected posterior utility. We also describe how to approximate such a treatment policy with a clinically interpretable individualized treatment rule, and quantify its expected outcome. The proposed method performs very well in extensive simulation studies in comparison with several existing methods. We illustrate the usage of the proposed method to identify an individualized choice of conditioning regimen for patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation and quantify the value of this method of choice in relation to the optimal individualized treatment rule as well as non-individualized treatment strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BART; Individualized treatment rules; boosting; optimal ITR; outcome weighted learning; prediction models; random forests; subgroup analysis; value function estimation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29254443      PMCID: PMC6028324          DOI: 10.1177/0962280217746191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  14 in total

1.  Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data.

Authors:  Jared C Foster; Jeremy M G Taylor; Stephen J Ruberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Subgroup identification based on differential effect search--a recursive partitioning method for establishing response to treatment in patient subpopulations.

Authors:  Ilya Lipkovich; Alex Dmitrienko; Jonathan Denne; Gregory Enas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Simple subgroup approximations to optimal treatment regimes from randomized clinical trial data.

Authors:  Jared C Foster; Jeremy M G Taylor; Niko Kaciroti; Bin Nan
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Estimating optimal treatment regimes via subgroup identification in randomized control trials and observational studies.

Authors:  Haoda Fu; Jin Zhou; Douglas E Faries
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Regularized outcome weighted subgroup identification for differential treatment effects.

Authors:  Yaoyao Xu; Menggang Yu; Ying-Qi Zhao; Quefeng Li; Sijian Wang; Jun Shao
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Tree-based methods for individualized treatment regimes.

Authors:  E B Laber; Y Q Zhao
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.445

7.  Nonparametric survival analysis using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART).

Authors:  Rodney A Sparapani; Brent R Logan; Robert E McCulloch; Purushottam W Laud
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Reinforcement learning strategies for clinical trials in nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yufan Zhao; Donglin Zeng; Mark A Socinski; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Using decision lists to construct interpretable and parsimonious treatment regimes.

Authors:  Yichi Zhang; Eric B Laber; Anastasios Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules Using Outcome Weighted Learning.

Authors:  Yingqi Zhao; Donglin Zeng; A John Rush; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

View more
  8 in total

1.  Bayesian additive regression trees and the General BART model.

Authors:  Yaoyuan Vincent Tan; Jason Roy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Effectiveness of modified constraint-induced movement therapy for upper limb function intervention following stroke: A brief review.

Authors:  Manting Cao; Xia Li
Journal:  Sports Med Health Sci       Date:  2021-08-10

3.  Noninferiority and equivalence tests in sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials (SMARTs).

Authors:  Palash Ghosh; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Bonnie Spring; Bibhas Chakraborty
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2019-09-09

4.  Using the Causal Inference Framework to Support Individualized Drug Treatment Decisions Based on Observational Healthcare Data.

Authors:  Andreas D Meid; Carmen Ruff; Lucas Wirbka; Felicitas Stoll; Hanna M Seidling; Andreas Groll; Walter E Haefeli
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  Optimal Donor Selection for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Bayesian Machine Learning.

Authors:  Brent R Logan; Martin J Maiers; Rodney A Sparapani; Purushottam W Laud; Stephen R Spellman; Robert E McCulloch; Bronwen E Shaw
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-05

6.  Estimating heterogeneous survival treatment effects of lung cancer screening approaches: A causal machine learning analysis.

Authors:  Liangyuan Hu; Jung-Yi Lin; Keith Sigel; Minal Kale
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 6.996

7.  Utility based approach in individualized optimal dose selection using machine learning methods.

Authors:  Pin Li; Jeremy M G Taylor; Philip S Boonstra; Theodore S Lawrence; Matthew J Schipper
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Optimal individualized decision rules from a multi-arm trial: A comparison of methods and an application to tailoring inter-donation intervals among blood donors in the UK.

Authors:  Yuejia Xu; Angela M Wood; Michael J Sweeting; David J Roberts; Brian Dm Tom
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 3.021

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.