Literature DB >> 33173350

Using the Causal Inference Framework to Support Individualized Drug Treatment Decisions Based on Observational Healthcare Data.

Andreas D Meid1, Carmen Ruff1, Lucas Wirbka1, Felicitas Stoll1, Hanna M Seidling1,2, Andreas Groll3, Walter E Haefeli1,2.   

Abstract

When healthcare professionals have the choice between several drug treatments for their patients, they often experience considerable decision uncertainty because many decisions simply have no single "best" choice. The challenges are manifold and include that guideline recommendations focus on randomized controlled trials whose populations do not necessarily correspond to specific patients in everyday treatment. Further reasons may be insufficient evidence on outcomes, lack of direct comparison of distinct options, and the need to individually balance benefits and risks. All these situations will occur in routine care, its outcomes will be mirrored in routine data, and could thus be used to guide decisions. We propose a concept to facilitate decision-making by exploiting this wealth of information. Our working example for illustration assumes that the response to a particular (drug) treatment can substantially differ between individual patients depending on their characteristics (heterogeneous treatment effects, HTE), and that decisions will be more precise if they are based on real-world evidence of HTE considering this information. However, such methods must account for confounding by indication and effect measure modification, eg, by adequately using machine learning methods or parametric regressions to estimate individual responses to pharmacological treatments. The better a model assesses the underlying HTE, the more accurate are predicted probabilities of treatment response. After probabilities for treatment-related benefit and harm have been calculated, decision rules can be applied and patient preferences can be considered to provide individual recommendations. Emulated trials in observational data are a straightforward technique to predict the effects of such decision rules when applied in routine care. Prediction-based decision rules from routine data have the potential to efficiently supplement clinical guidelines and support healthcare professionals in creating personalized treatment plans using decision support tools.
© 2020 Meid et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  claims data; confounding by indication; decision-making; effect modification; heterogeneous treatment effects; prediction-based decision rules

Year:  2020        PMID: 33173350      PMCID: PMC7646479          DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S274466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 1179-1349            Impact factor:   4.790


  64 in total

1.  A systematic survey identified 36 criteria for assessing effect modification claims in randomized trials or meta-analyses.

Authors:  Stefan Schandelmaier; Yaping Chang; Niveditha Devasenapathy; Tahira Devji; Joey S W Kwong; Luis E Colunga Lozano; Yung Lee; Arnav Agarwal; Neera Bhatnagar; Hannah Ewald; Ying Zhang; Xin Sun; Lehana Thabane; Michael Walsh; Matthias Briel; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Comparing methods for estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects using observational data from health care databases.

Authors:  T Wendling; K Jung; A Callahan; A Schuler; N H Shah; B Gallego
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The proposed 'concordance-statistic for benefit' provided a useful metric when modeling heterogeneous treatment effects.

Authors:  David van Klaveren; Ewout W Steyerberg; Patrick W Serruys; David M Kent
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Clopidogrel Drug Interactions and Serious Bleeding: Generating Real-World Evidence via Automated High-Throughput Pharmacoepidemiologic Screening.

Authors:  Charles E Leonard; Meijia Zhou; Colleen M Brensinger; Warren B Bilker; Samantha E Soprano; Thanh Phuong Pham Nguyen; Young Hee Nam; Jordana B Cohen; Sean Hennessy
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 5.  The implications of a growing evidence base for drug use in elderly patients Part 2. ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in heart failure and high cardiovascular risk patients.

Authors:  A A Mangoni; S H D Jackson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Decision making and uncertainty quantification for individualized treatments using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees.

Authors:  Brent R Logan; Rodney Sparapani; Robert E McCulloch; Purushottam W Laud
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  What, if all alerts were specific - estimating the potential impact on drug interaction alert burden.

Authors:  Hanna M Seidling; Ulrike Klein; Matthias Schaier; David Czock; Dirk Theile; Markus G Pruszydlo; Jens Kaltschmidt; Gerd Mikus; Walter E Haefeli
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 4.046

8.  Risk prediction for heterogeneous populations with application to hospital admission prediction.

Authors:  Jared D Huling; Menggang Yu; Muxuan Liang; Maureen Smith
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Selecting Optimal Subgroups for Treatment Using Many Covariates.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Alex R Luedtke; Mark J van der Laan; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Aim for Clinical Utility, Not Just Predictive Accuracy.

Authors:  Michael C Sachs; Arvid Sjölander; Erin E Gabriel
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.860

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Causal machine learning for healthcare and precision medicine.

Authors:  Pedro Sanchez; Jeremy P Voisey; Tian Xia; Hannah I Watson; Alison Q O'Neil; Sotirios A Tsaftaris
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.653

2.  Can Machine Learning from Real-World Data Support Drug Treatment Decisions? A Prediction Modeling Case for Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Authors:  Andreas D Meid; Lucas Wirbka; Andreas Groll; Walter E Haefeli
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.749

Review 3.  Learning Causal Effects From Observational Data in Healthcare: A Review and Summary.

Authors:  Jingpu Shi; Beau Norgeot
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-07

4.  Machine learning for tumor growth inhibition: Interpretable predictive models for transparency and reproducibility.

Authors:  Andreas D Meid; Alexander Gerharz; Andreas Groll
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.