Literature DB >> 25271604

Provision of no-cost, long-acting contraception and teenage pregnancy.

Gina M Secura1, Tessa Madden, Colleen McNicholas, Jennifer Mullersman, Christina M Buckel, Qiuhong Zhao, Jeffrey F Peipert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rate of teenage pregnancy in the United States is higher than in other developed nations. Teenage births result in substantial costs, including public assistance, health care costs, and income losses due to lower educational attainment and reduced earning potential.
METHODS: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project was a large prospective cohort study designed to promote the use of long-acting, reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods to reduce unintended pregnancy in the St. Louis region. Participants were educated about reversible contraception, with an emphasis on the benefits of LARC methods, were provided with their choice of reversible contraception at no cost, and were followed for 2 to 3 years. We analyzed pregnancy, birth, and induced-abortion rates among teenage girls and women 15 to 19 years of age in this cohort and compared them with those observed nationally among U.S. teens in the same age group.
RESULTS: Of the 1404 teenage girls and women enrolled in CHOICE, 72% chose an intrauterine device or implant (LARC methods); the remaining 28% chose another method. During the 2008-2013 period, the mean annual rates of pregnancy, birth, and abortion among CHOICE participants were 34.0, 19.4, and 9.7 per 1000 teens, respectively. In comparison, rates of pregnancy, birth, and abortion among sexually experienced U.S. teens in 2008 were 158.5, 94.0, and 41.5 per 1000, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Teenage girls and women who were provided contraception at no cost and educated about reversible contraception and the benefits of LARC methods had rates of pregnancy, birth, and abortion that were much lower than the national rates for sexually experienced teens. (Funded by the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation and others.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25271604      PMCID: PMC4230891          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1400506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  12 in total

1.  Adolescent clinic visits for contraception: support from mothers, male partners and friends.

Authors:  Cynthia Harper; Lisa Callegari; Tina Raine; Maya Blum; Philip Darney
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

2.  Meeting the contraceptive needs of teens and young adults: youth-friendly and long-acting reversible contraceptive services in U.S. family planning facilities.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Jenna Jerman; Kathleen Ethier; Susan Moskosky
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Brooke Winner; Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Christina Buckel; Tessa Madden; Jenifer E Allsworth; Gina M Secura
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Gina M Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Jennifer L Mullersman; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Continuation of reversible contraception in teenagers and young women.

Authors:  Jessica R Rosenstock; Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden; Qiuhong Zhao; Gina M Secura
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: do immediate postpartum contraceptive implants make a difference?

Authors:  Kristina M Tocce; Jeanelle L Sheeder; Stephanie B Teal
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Teenagers in the United States: sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, 2006-2010 national survey of family growth.

Authors:  Gladys Martinez; Casey E Copen; Joyce C Abma
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2011-10

8.  Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents and young adults: patient and provider perspectives.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Lori Frohwirth; Jenna Jerman; Ronna Popkin; Kathleen Ethier
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 1.814

9.  Twenty-four-month continuation of reversible contraception.

Authors:  Micaela O'Neil-Callahan; Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Tessa Madden; Gina Secura
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Jenna Jerman; Megan L Kavanaugh
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  92 in total

1.  Northridge and Coupey Respond.

Authors:  Jennifer L Northridge; Susan M Coupey
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The US Supreme Court and the Future of Reproductive Health.

Authors:  Sara Rosenbaum
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Rachel Paul; Ragini Maddipati; Christina Buckel; Melody Goodman; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 4.  Topical Microbicides in HIV Prevention: State of the Promise.

Authors:  Jared M Baeten; Craig W Hendrix; Sharon L Hillier
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 13.739

Review 5.  The role of decidual cells in uterine hemostasis, menstruation, inflammation, adverse pregnancy outcomes and abnormal uterine bleeding.

Authors:  Frederick Schatz; Ozlem Guzeloglu-Kayisli; Sefa Arlier; Umit A Kayisli; Charles J Lockwood
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 15.610

6.  Contraception for Adolescents: Focusing on Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives (LARC) to Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Bliss Kaneshiro; Jennifer Salcedo
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2015-01-28

Review 7.  Universal access to no-cost contraception for youth in Canada.

Authors:  Giuseppina Di Meglio; Elisabeth Yorke
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  Regulatory approval time for hormonal contraception in Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom, 2000-2015: a retrospective data analysis.

Authors:  Christine Troskie; Judith A Soon; Arianne Y Albert; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-11-03

9.  Improving the Implementation of Evidence-Based Clinical Practices in Adolescent Reproductive Health Care Services.

Authors:  Lisa M Romero; Dawn Middleton; Trisha Mueller; Lia Avellino; Rachel Hallum-Montes
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.012

10.  Efficacy of a web-based women's health survivorship care plan for young breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  H Irene Su; Shaylyn Stark; Brian Kwan; Sarah Boles; Diana Chingos; Jennifer Ehren; Jessica R Gorman; Michael Krychman; Sally A D Romero; Jun J Mao; John P Pierce; Loki Natarajan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.