Literature DB >> 33096126

Implementation science: Scaling a training intervention to include IUDs and implants in contraceptive services in primary care.

Cynthia C Harper1, Alison B Comfort2, Maya Blum2, Corinne H Rocca2, Charles E McCulloch3, Lavanya Rao2, Nishant Shah4, Helen Oquendo Del Toro5, Suzan Goodman6.   

Abstract

Building capacity for contraceptive services in primary care settings, including for intrauterine devices (IUDs) and implants, can help to broaden contraceptive access across the US. Following a randomized trial in family planning clinics, we brought a provider training intervention to other clinical settings including primary care in all regions. This implementation science study evaluates a national scale-up of a contraceptive training intervention to varied practice settings from 2013 to 2019 among 3216 clinic staff serving an estimated 1.6 million annual contraceptive patients. We measured providers' knowledge and clinical practice changes regarding IUDs and implants using survey data. We estimated the overall intervention effect, and its relative effectiveness in primary care settings, with generalized estimating equations for clustered data. Patient-centered counseling improved, along with comfort with method provision and removal. Provider knowledge increased (p < 0.001), as did evidence-based counseling for IUDs (aOR 3.3 95% CI 2.8-3.9) and implants (aOR 3.5, 95% CI 3.0-4.1), and clinician competency in copper and levonorgestrel IUDs (aORs 1.8-2.6 95% CIs 1.5-3.2) and implants (aOR 2.4 95% CI 2.0-2.9). While proficiency was lower initially in primary care, gains were significant and at times greater than in Planned Parenthood health clinics. This intervention was effectively scaled, including in primary care settings with limited prior experience with these methods. Recent changes to Title X family planning funding rules exclude several large family planning providers, shifting greater responsibility to primary care and other settings. Scaling effective contraceptive interventions is one way to ensure capacity to offer patients full contraceptive services.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraceptive access; Implementation science; Intrauterine devices; Primary care; Provider training intervention; Subdermal implant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33096126      PMCID: PMC8032203          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.637


  42 in total

1.  An agenda for research on the sustainability of public health programs.

Authors:  Mary Ann Scheirer; James W Dearing
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  California Family Planning Health Care Providers' Challenges to Same-Day Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Provision.

Authors:  M Antonia Biggs; Cynthia C Harper; Claire D Brindis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Rachel Paul; Ragini Maddipati; Christina Buckel; Melody Goodman; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Cynthia Vinson; David Chambers; Muin J Khoury; Robert M Kaplan; Christine Hunter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Anu Manchikanti Gomez; Liza Fuentes; Amy Allina
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2014-05-23

6.  Evidence-based IUD practice: family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Jillian T Henderson; Tina R Raine; Suzan Goodman; Philip D Darney; Kirsten M Thompson; Christine Dehlendorf; J Joseph Speidel
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  The impact of an IUD and implant intervention on dual method use among young women: Results from a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Alison M El Ayadi; Corinne H Rocca; Julia E Kohn; Denisse Velazquez; Maya Blum; Sara J Newmann; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  US family physicians' intrauterine and implantable contraception provision: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Mollie B Nisen; Lars E Peterson; Anneli Cochrane; Susan E Rubin
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: a call for a rapid learning health research enterprise.

Authors:  William T Riley; Russell E Glasgow; Lynn Etheredge; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2013-05-10

10.  Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Condom Use Among Female US High School Students: Implications for Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevention.

Authors:  Riley J Steiner; Nicole Liddon; Andrea L Swartzendruber; Catherine N Rasberry; Jessica M Sales
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 26.796

View more
  1 in total

1.  Expanding Access to Contraception: Identifying Accessibility Gaps Across Hawai'i Communities.

Authors:  Alyssandra Baniqued; Sarah Murayama; Rochelle Mae Cadiente; Bianca Calio; Jessica Cabusog; Kellie Goya; Jasmine Tyson; Teresa Schiff-Elfalan; Komal Soin; Bliss Kaneshiro
Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf       Date:  2022-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.