BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists provide much of contraceptive care in the United States and have a shared goal in preventing unintended pregnancy among patients. We assessed their competency to offer women contraceptives of the highest efficacy levels. METHODS: We conducted a national probability survey of family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists (n=1,192). We measured counseling and provision practices of intrauterine contraception and used multivariable regression analysis to evaluate the importance of evidence-based knowledge to contraceptive care. RESULTS: Family physicians reported seeing fewer contraceptive patients per week than did obstetrician-gynecologists and were less likely to report sufficient time for counseling. While 95% of family physicians believed patients were receptive to learning about intrauterine contraception, fewer than half offered counseling or the method. Only half were trained to competence to offer intrauterine contraception, while virtually all obstetrician-gynecologists were. Both family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists were unlikely to have adequate knowledge of the women who would be good candidates for intrauterine contraception-as gauged by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Medical Eligibility Criteria for contraception-and consequently did not offer the method to a wide range of eligible patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most family physicians providing contraceptive care were not offering methods with top-tier effectiveness, although they reported interest in updating contraceptive skills through training. Obstetrician-gynecologists had technical skills to offer intrauterine contraception but still required education on patient selection. Greater hands-on training opportunities for family physicians, and complementary education on eligible method candidates for obstetrician-gynecologists, can increase access to intrauterine contraception by women seeking contraceptive care.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists provide much of contraceptive care in the United States and have a shared goal in preventing unintended pregnancy among patients. We assessed their competency to offer women contraceptives of the highest efficacy levels. METHODS: We conducted a national probability survey of family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists (n=1,192). We measured counseling and provision practices of intrauterine contraception and used multivariable regression analysis to evaluate the importance of evidence-based knowledge to contraceptive care. RESULTS: Family physicians reported seeing fewer contraceptive patients per week than did obstetrician-gynecologists and were less likely to report sufficient time for counseling. While 95% of family physicians believed patients were receptive to learning about intrauterine contraception, fewer than half offered counseling or the method. Only half were trained to competence to offer intrauterine contraception, while virtually all obstetrician-gynecologists were. Both family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists were unlikely to have adequate knowledge of the women who would be good candidates for intrauterine contraception-as gauged by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Medical Eligibility Criteria for contraception-and consequently did not offer the method to a wide range of eligible patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most family physicians providing contraceptive care were not offering methods with top-tier effectiveness, although they reported interest in updating contraceptive skills through training. Obstetrician-gynecologists had technical skills to offer intrauterine contraception but still required education on patient selection. Greater hands-on training opportunities for family physicians, and complementary education on eligible method candidates for obstetrician-gynecologists, can increase access to intrauterine contraception by women seeking contraceptive care.
Authors: David Hubacher; Rosa Vilchez; Rebecca Gmach; Carlos Jarquin; Jose Medrano; Auxiliadora Gadea; Tom Grey; Bosny Pierre-Louis Journal: Contraception Date: 2006-03-29 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Jessica Morse; Lori Freedman; J Joseph Speidel; Kirsten M J Thompson; Laura Stratton; Cynthia C Harper Journal: Perspect Sex Reprod Health Date: 2012-04-24
Authors: Debbie Postlethwaite; Ruth Shaber; Victoria Mancuso; Jean Flores; Mary Anne Armstrong Journal: Contraception Date: 2007-01-16 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Lisa S Callegari; Blair G Darney; Emily M Godfrey; Olivia Sementi; Rebecca Dunsmoor-Su; Sarah W Prager Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Cynthia C Harper; Laura Stratton; Tina R Raine; Kirsten Thompson; Jillian T Henderson; Maya Blum; Debbie Postlethwaite; J Joseph Speidel Journal: Prev Med Date: 2013-10-12 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Lauryn P Roth; Jessica N Sanders; Rebecca G Simmons; Holly Bullock; Elizabeth Jacobson; David K Turok Journal: Contraception Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Kirsten M J Thompson; Corinne H Rocca; Lisa Stern; Johanna Morfesis; Suzan Goodman; Jody Steinauer; Cynthia C Harper Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 8.661