Literature DB >> 33201701

Automated, Accurate, and Scalable Relative Protein-Ligand Binding Free-Energy Calculations Using Lambda Dynamics.

E Prabhu Raman1, Thomas J Paul2, Ryan L Hayes2, Charles L Brooks2,3.   

Abstract

Accurate predictions of changes to protein-ligand binding affinity in response to chemical modifications are of utility in small-molecule lead optimization. Relative free-energy perturbation (FEP) approaches are one of the most widely utilized for this goal but involve significant computational cost, thus limiting their application to small sets of compounds. Lambda dynamics, also rigorously based on the principles of statistical mechanics, provides a more efficient alternative. In this paper, we describe the development of a workflow to set up, execute, and analyze multisite lambda dynamics (MSLD) calculations run on GPUs with CHARMM implemented in BIOVIA Discovery Studio and Pipeline Pilot. The workflow establishes a framework for setting up simulation systems for exploratory screening of modifications to a lead compound, enabling the calculation of relative binding affinities of combinatorial libraries. To validate the workflow, a diverse data set of congeneric ligands for seven proteins with experimental binding affinity data is examined. A protocol to automatically tailor fit biasing potentials iteratively to flatten the free-energy landscape of any MSLD system is developed, which enhances sampling and allows for efficient estimation of free-energy differences. The protocol is first validated on a large number of ligand subsets that model diverse substituents, which shows accurate and reliable performance. The scalability of the workflow is also tested to screen more than 100 ligands modeled in a single system, which also resulted in accurate predictions. With a cumulative sampling time of 150 ns or less, the method results in average unsigned errors of under 1 kcal/mol in most cases for both small and large combinatorial libraries. For the multisite systems examined, the method is estimated to be more than an order of magnitude more efficient than contemporary FEP applications. The results thus demonstrate the utility of the presented MSLD workflow to efficiently screen combinatorial libraries and explore the chemical space around a lead compound and thus are of utility in lead optimization.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33201701      PMCID: PMC7814773          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  33 in total

1.  Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models.

Authors:  P A Kollman; I Massova; C Reyes; B Kuhn; S Huo; L Chong; M Lee; T Lee; Y Duan; W Wang; O Donini; P Cieplak; J Srinivasan; D A Case; T E Cheatham
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 22.384

Review 2.  Cheminformatics analysis and learning in a data pipelining environment.

Authors:  Moises Hassan; Robert D Brown; Shikha Varma-O'brien; David Rogers
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  A fast and accurate computational approach to protein ionization.

Authors:  Velin Z Spassov; Lisa Yan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Predicting Activity Cliffs with Free-Energy Perturbation.

Authors:  Laura Pérez-Benito; Nil Casajuana-Martin; Mireia Jiménez-Rosés; Herman van Vlijmen; Gary Tresadern
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations.

Authors:  Zoe Cournia; Bryce Allen; Woody Sherman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  All-Atom Continuous Constant pH Molecular Dynamics With Particle Mesh Ewald and Titratable Water.

Authors:  Yandong Huang; Wei Chen; Jason A Wallace; Jana Shen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Hatcher; C Acharya; S Kundu; S Zhong; J Shim; E Darian; O Guvench; P Lopes; I Vorobyov; A D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  Overcoming Challenging Substituent Perturbations with Multisite λ-Dynamics: A Case Study Targeting β-Secretase 1.

Authors:  Jonah Z Vilseck; Noor Sohail; Ryan L Hayes; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 6.475

9.  New faster CHARMM molecular dynamics engine.

Authors:  Antti-Pekka Hynninen; Michael F Crowley
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  Fast, Accurate, and Reliable Protocols for Routine Calculations of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities in Drug Design Projects Using AMBER GPU-TI with ff14SB/GAFF.

Authors:  Xibing He; Shuhan Liu; Tai-Sung Lee; Beihong Ji; Viet H Man; Darrin M York; Junmei Wang
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-02-25
View more
  10 in total

1.  Application of Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation in Computer-Aided Drug Design.

Authors:  Himanshu Goel; Anthony Hazel; Wenbo Yu; Sunhwan Jo; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  New J Chem       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.591

2.  The Pharmacological Mechanism of Xiyanping Injection for the Treatment of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (COVID-19): Based on Network Pharmacology Strategy.

Authors:  Liang-Jing Xia; Liang-Ming Zhang; Kun Yang; Tong Chen; Xian-Wen Ye; Zi-Jun Yan
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Replica-Exchange Enveloping Distribution Sampling Using Generalized AMBER Force-Field Topologies: Application to Relative Hydration Free-Energy Calculations for Large Sets of Molecules.

Authors:  Salomé R Rieder; Benjamin Ries; Kay Schaller; Candide Champion; Emilia P Barros; Philippe H Hünenberger; Sereina Riniker
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 6.162

4.  BLaDE: A Basic Lambda Dynamics Engine for GPU-Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Ryan L Hayes; Joshua Buckner; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 6.578

5.  RestraintMaker: a graph-based approach to select distance restraints in free-energy calculations with dual topology.

Authors:  Benjamin Ries; Salomé Rieder; Clemens Rhiner; Philippe H Hünenberger; Sereina Riniker
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.179

6.  Identification of DPP4/CTNNB1/MET as a Theranostic Signature of Thyroid Cancer and Evaluation of the Therapeutic Potential of Sitagliptin.

Authors:  Sheng-Yao Cheng; Alexander T H Wu; Gaber El-Saber Batiha; Ching-Liang Ho; Jih-Chin Lee; Halimat Yusuf Lukman; Mohammed Alorabi; Abdullah N AlRasheedi; Jia-Hong Chen
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-17

7.  Scaffold Hopping Transformations Using Auxiliary Restraints for Calculating Accurate Relative Binding Free Energies.

Authors:  Junjie Zou; Zhipeng Li; Shuai Liu; Chunwang Peng; Dong Fang; Xiao Wan; Zhixiong Lin; Tai-Sung Lee; Daniel P Raleigh; Mingjun Yang; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 6.578

8.  Alchemical Free Energy Methods Applied to Complexes of the First Bromodomain of BRD4.

Authors:  Ellen E Guest; Luis F Cervantes; Stephen D Pickett; Charles L Brooks; Jonathan D Hirst
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 6.162

9.  Pre-Exascale Computing of Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energies with Open Source Software for Drug Design.

Authors:  Vytautas Gapsys; David F Hahn; Gary Tresadern; David L Mobley; Markus Rampp; Bert L de Groot
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Generalizing the Discrete Gibbs Sampler-Based λ-Dynamics Approach for Multisite Sampling of Many Ligands.

Authors:  Jonah Z Vilseck; Xinqiang Ding; Ryan L Hayes; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 6.006

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.