Literature DB >> 29234786

The effects of delay duration on visual working memory for orientation.

Hongsup Shin1, Qijia Zou1, Wei Ji Ma1.   

Abstract

We used a delayed-estimation paradigm to characterize the joint effects of set size (one, two, four, or six) and delay duration (1, 2, 3, or 6 s) on visual working memory for orientation. We conducted two experiments: one with delay durations blocked, another with delay durations interleaved. As dependent variables, we examined four model-free metrics of dispersion as well as precision estimates in four simple models. We tested for effects of delay time using analyses of variance, linear regressions, and nested model comparisons. We found significant effects of set size and delay duration on both model-free and model-based measures of dispersion. However, the effect of delay duration was much weaker than that of set size, dependent on the analysis method, and apparent in only a minority of subjects. The highest forgetting slope found in either experiment at any set size was a modest 1.14°/s. As secondary results, we found a low rate of nontarget reports, and significant estimation biases towards oblique orientations (but no dependence of their magnitude on either set size or delay duration). Relative stability of working memory even at higher set sizes is consistent with earlier results for motion direction and spatial frequency. We compare with a recent study that performed a very similar experiment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29234786      PMCID: PMC6097585          DOI: 10.1167/17.14.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  40 in total

Review 1.  The psychophysics of perceptual memory.

Authors:  S Magnussen; M W Greenlee
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1999

2.  Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Hongsup Shin; Wen-Chuang Chou; Ryan George; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Parallel processing in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  S Magnussen; M W Greenlee; J P Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Stimulus-specific variability in color working memory with delayed estimation.

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Maria Olkkonen; Sarah R Allred; Colin Wilson; Jonathan I Flombaum
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Accounting for stimulus-specific variation in precision reveals a discrete capacity limit in visual working memory.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte; Young Eun Park; Rosanne L Rademaker; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Precision of working memory for visual motion sequences and transparent motion surfaces.

Authors:  Nahid Zokaei; Nikos Gorgoraptis; Bahador Bahrami; Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Factorial comparison of working memory models.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Edward Awh; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Delayed pattern discrimination in patients with unilateral temporal lobe damage.

Authors:  M W Greenlee; J Rischewski; T Mergner; W Seeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Rapid forgetting results from competition over time between items in visual working memory.

Authors:  Yoni Pertzov; Sanjay Manohar; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  10 in total

1.  Separating memoranda in depth increases visual working memory performance.

Authors:  Chaipat Chunharas; Rosanne L Rademaker; Thomas C Sprague; Timothy F Brady; John T Serences
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  An adaptive perspective on visual working memory distortions.

Authors:  Chaipat Chunharas; Rosanne L Rademaker; Timothy F Brady; John T Serences
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2022-02-21

3.  Sequence structure organizes items in varied latent states of working memory neural network.

Authors:  Qiaoli Huang; Huihui Zhang; Huan Luo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Gradual decay and sudden death of short-term memory for pitch.

Authors:  Samuel R Mathias; Leonard Varghese; Christophe Micheyl; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Drift in Neural Population Activity Causes Working Memory to Deteriorate Over Time.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneegans; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Error-correcting dynamics in visual working memory.

Authors:  Matthew F Panichello; Brian DePasquale; Jonathan W Pillow; Timothy J Buschman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Errors in visuospatial working memory across space and time.

Authors:  Linjing Jiang; Hoi-Chung Leung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Crows control working memory before and after stimulus encoding.

Authors:  Erica Fongaro; Jonas Rose
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Subjective confidence reflects representation of Bayesian probability in cortex.

Authors:  Laura S Geurts; James R H Cooke; Ruben S van Bergen; Janneke F M Jehee
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-01-20

10.  Delay-period activity in frontal, parietal, and occipital cortex tracks noise and biases in visual working memory.

Authors:  Qing Yu; Matthew F Panichello; Ying Cai; Bradley R Postle; Timothy J Buschman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 9.593

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.