Literature DB >> 35191726

An adaptive perspective on visual working memory distortions.

Chaipat Chunharas1, Rosanne L Rademaker1, Timothy F Brady1, John T Serences1.   

Abstract

When holding multiple items in visual working memory, representations of individual items are often attracted to, or repelled from, each other. While this is empirically well-established, existing frameworks do not account for both types of distortions, which appear to be in opposition. Here, we demonstrate that both types of memory distortion may confer functional benefits under different circumstances. When there are many items to remember and subjects are near their capacity to accurately remember each item individually, memories for each item become more similar (attraction). However, when remembering smaller sets of highly similar but discernible items, memory for each item becomes more distinct (repulsion), possibly to support better discrimination. Importantly, this repulsion grows stronger with longer delays, suggesting that it dynamically evolves in memory and is not just a differentiation process that occurs during encoding. Furthermore, both attraction and repulsion occur even in tasks designed to mitigate response bias concerns, suggesting they are genuine changes in memory representations. Together, these results are in line with the theory that attraction biases act to stabilize memory signals by capitalizing on information about an entire group of items, whereas repulsion biases reflect a tradeoff between maintaining accurate but distinct representations. Both biases suggest that human memory systems may sacrifice veridical representations in favor of representations that better support specific behavioral goals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35191726      PMCID: PMC9392817          DOI: 10.1037/xge0001191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  68 in total

1.  Recognizing identical versus similar categorically related common objects: further evidence for degraded gist representations in amnesia.

Authors:  W Koutstaal; M Verfaellie; D L Schacter
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 2.  Visual objects in context.

Authors:  Moshe Bar
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  The tilt illusion: repulsion and attraction effects in the oblique meridian.

Authors:  B O'Toole; P Wenderoth
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Focused attention distorts visual space: an attentional repulsion effect.

Authors:  S Suzuki; P Cavanagh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The number and quality of representations in working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-10-10

6.  Some deleterious consequences of the act of recollection.

Authors:  J W Schooler; R A Foster; E F Loftus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-05

7.  Evidence of gradual loss of precision for simple features and complex objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Rosanne L Rademaker; Young Eun Park; Alexander T Sack; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Search goal tunes visual features optimally.

Authors:  Vidhya Navalpakkam; Laurent Itti
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Individual representations in visual working memory inherit ensemble properties.

Authors:  Igor S Utochkin; Timothy F Brady
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Raquel F G Catalao; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Flexible top-down control in the interaction between working memory and perception.

Authors:  Chunyue Teng; Jacqueline M Fulvio; Jiefeng Jiang; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

2.  Neural interactions in working memory explain decreased recall precision and similarity-based feature repulsion.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Amanda E van Lamsweerde; Evelina Dineva; John P Spencer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Long-term memory interference is resolved via repulsion and precision along diagnostic memory dimensions.

Authors:  Maxwell L Drascher; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-04-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.