Literature DB >> 34262103

Errors in visuospatial working memory across space and time.

Linjing Jiang1, Hoi-Chung Leung2.   

Abstract

Visuospatial working memory (VSWM) involves cortical regions along the dorsal visual pathway, which are topographically organized with respect to the visual space. However, it remains unclear how such functional organization may constrain VSWM behavior across space and time. Here, we systematically mapped VSWM performance across the 2-dimensional (2D) space in various retention intervals in human subjects using the memory-guided and visually guided saccade tasks in two experiments. Relative to visually guided saccades, memory-guided saccades showed significant increases in unsystematic errors, or response variability, with increasing target eccentricity (3°-13° of visual angle). Unsystematic errors also increased with increasing delay (1.5-3 s, Experiment 1; 0.5-5 s, Experiment 2), while there was little or no interaction between delay and eccentricity. Continuous bump attractor modeling suggested neurophysiological and functional organization factors in the increasing unsystematic errors in VSWM across space and time. These findings indicate that: (1) VSWM representation may be limited by the functional topology of the visual pathway for the 2D space; (2) Unsystematic errors may reflect accumulated noise from memory maintenance while systematic errors may originate from non-mnemonic processes such as noisy sensorimotor transformation; (3) There may be independent mechanisms supporting the spatial and temporal processing of VSWM.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34262103     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93858-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  79 in total

1.  Comparison of performance on memory-guided saccade and delayed spatial match-to-sample tasks in monkeys.

Authors:  Ioan Opris; Andrei Barborica; Vincent P Ferrera
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Compression of space in visual memory.

Authors:  B R Sheth; S Shimojo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Sensorimotor transformation during eye movements to remembered visual targets.

Authors:  J W Gnadt; R M Bracewell; R A Andersen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Spatial working memory capacity predicts bias in estimates of location.

Authors:  L Elizabeth Crawford; David Landy; Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  A Quadrantic Bias in Prefrontal Representation of Visual-Mnemonic Space.

Authors:  Matthew L Leavitt; Florian Pieper; Adam J Sachs; Julio C Martinez-Trujillo
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 7.  Changing concepts of working memory.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Masud Husain; Paul M Bays
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkey's dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  S Funahashi; C J Bruce; P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Saccades to remembered target locations: an analysis of systematic and variable errors.

Authors:  J M White; D L Sparks; T R Stanford
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Raquel F G Catalao; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.