Literature DB >> 29225669

Self-Regulation Principles Underlying Risk Perception and Decision Making within the Context of Genomic Testing.

Linda D Cameron1, Barbara Bowles Biesecker2, Ellen Peters3, Jennifer M Taber4, William M P Klein4.   

Abstract

Advances in theory and research on self-regulation and decision-making processes have yielded important insights into how cognitive, emotional, and social processes shape risk perceptions and risk-related decisions. We examine how self-regulation theory can be applied to inform our understanding of decision-making processes within the context of genomic testing, a clinical arena in which individuals face complex risk information and potentially life-altering decisions. After presenting key principles of self-regulation, we present a genomic testing case example to illustrate how principles related to risk representations, approach and avoidance motivations, emotion regulation, defensive responses, temporal construals, and capacities such as numeric abilities can shape decisions and psychological responses during the genomic testing process. We conclude with implications for using self-regulation theory to advance science within genomic testing and opportunities for how this research can inform further developments in self-regulation theory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Self-regulation; decision making; genetic testing; genomic testing; risk perception

Year:  2017        PMID: 29225669      PMCID: PMC5716481          DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass        ISSN: 1751-9004


  61 in total

1.  Risk as feelings.

Authors:  G F Loewenstein; E U Weber; C K Hsee; N Welch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Helping patients decide: ten steps to better risk communication.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Information Avoidance Tendencies, Threat Management Resources, and Interest in Genetic Sequencing Feedback.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein; Rebecca A Ferrer; Katie L Lewis; Peter R Harris; James A Shepperd; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2015-08

4.  Psychological impact of genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ellen R Gritz; Susan K Peterson; Sally W Vernon; Salma K Marani; Walter F Baile; Beatty G Watts; Christopher I Amos; Marsha L Frazier; Patrick M Lynch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Can self-esteem, mastery and perceived stigma predict long-term adjustment in women carrying a BRCA1/2-mutation? Evidence from a multi-center study.

Authors:  Andrea Vodermaier; Mary Jane Esplen; Christine Maheu
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Genetic and lifestyle causal beliefs about obesity and associated diseases among ethnically diverse patients: a structured interview study.

Authors:  S C Sanderson; M A Diefenbach; S A Streicher; E W Jabs; M Smirnoff; C R Horowitz; R Zinberg; C Clesca; L D Richardson
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  The effect of construal level on subjective probability estimates.

Authors:  Cheryl Wakslak; Yaacov Trope
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-12-05

8.  The impact of learning of a genetic predisposition to nicotine dependence: an analogue study.

Authors:  A J Wright; J Weinman; T M Marteau
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  The role of numeracy in informed consent for surveys.

Authors:  Mick P Couper; Eleanor Singer
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 10.  The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; David P French; Simon J Griffin; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton; Sarah King; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-03-15
View more
  5 in total

1.  A primer in genomics for social and behavioral investigators.

Authors:  Erin Turbitt; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Representations of cancer recurrence risk, recurrence worry, and health-protective behaviours: an elaborated, systematic review.

Authors:  Arturo Durazo; Linda D Cameron
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-06-03

3.  Toward a theoretical understanding of young female cancer survivors' decision-making about family-building post-treatment.

Authors:  Catherine Benedict; Alexandria L Hahn; Alyssa McCready; Joanne F Kelvin; Michael Diefenbach; Jennifer S Ford
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials to Assess Outcomes of Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Barbara A Athens; Samantha L Caldwell; Kendall L Umstead; Philip D Connors; Ethan Brenna; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Genetic test reporting of CDKN2A provides informational and motivational benefits for managing melanoma risk.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Tammy K Stump; Jennifer M Taber; Danielle M Drummond; Wendy Kohlmann; Marjan Champine; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.