Literature DB >> 15774782

Psychological impact of genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Ellen R Gritz1, Susan K Peterson, Sally W Vernon, Salma K Marani, Walter F Baile, Beatty G Watts, Christopher I Amos, Marsha L Frazier, Patrick M Lynch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examines the impact of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) genetic test results on psychological outcomes among cancer-affected and -unaffected participants up to 1 year after results disclosure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 155 persons completed study measures before HNPCC genetic testing, and at 2 weeks and 6 and 12 months after disclosure of test results.
RESULTS: Mean scores on all outcome measures remained stable and within normal limits for cancer-affected participants, regardless of mutation status. Among unaffected carriers of HNPCC-predisposing mutations, mean depression, state anxiety, and cancer worries scores increased from baseline to 2 weeks postdisclosure and decreased from 2 weeks to 6 months postdisclosure. Among unaffected noncarriers, mean depression and anxiety scores did not differ, but cancer worries scores decreased during the same time period. Affected and unaffected carriers had higher mean test-specific distress scores at 2 weeks postdisclosure compared with noncarriers in their respective groups; scores decreased for affected carriers and all unaffected participants from 2 weeks to 12 months postdisclosure. Classification of participants into high- versus low-distress clusters using mean scores on baseline psychological measures predicted significantly higher or lower follow-up scores, respectively, on depression, state anxiety, quality of life, and test-specific distress measures, regardless of mutation status.
CONCLUSION: Although HNPCC genetic testing does not result in long-term adverse psychological outcomes, unaffected mutation carriers may experience increased distress during the immediate postdisclosure time period. Furthermore, those with higher levels of baseline mood disturbance, lower quality of life, and lower social support may be at risk for both short- and long-term increased distress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15774782     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  50 in total

1.  The role of distress in uptake and response to predisposition genetic testing: the BMPR2 experience.

Authors:  Diana L Jones; Ellen W Clayton
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2011-11-15

2.  Reproductive Decision-Making in MMR Mutation Carriers After Results Disclosure: Impact of Psychological Status in Childbearing Options.

Authors:  Jacqueline Duffour; Audrey Combes; Evelyne Crapez; Florence Boissière-Michot; Frédéric Bibeau; Pierre Senesse; Marc Ychou; Julie Courraud; Hélène de Forges; Lise Roca
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  The added value of PMS2 immunostaining in the diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Britta Halvarsson; Annika Lindblom; Eva Rambech; Kristina Lagerstedt; Mef Nilbert
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Development and validation of an instrument to measure the impact of genetic testing on self-concept in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  M J Esplen; N Stuckless; S Gallinger; M Aronson; H Rothenmund; K Semotiuk; J Stokes; C Way; J Green; K Butler; H V Petersen; J Wong
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Deaf genetic testing and psychological well-being in deaf adults.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer; Patrick Boudreault; Erin E Baldwin; Michelle Fox; Joshua L Deignan; Yoko Kobayashi; Yvonne Sininger; Wayne Grody; Janet S Sinsheimer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Value of Genetic Testing for Hereditary Colorectal Cancer in a Probability-Based US Online Sample.

Authors:  Sara J Knight; Ateesha F Mohamed; Deborah A Marshall; Uri Ladabaum; Kathryn A Phillips; Judith M E Walsh
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Genetic risk assessment for women with epithelial ovarian cancer: referral patterns and outcomes in a university gynecologic oncology clinic.

Authors:  Sue V Petzel; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Tracy Bensend; Anna Leininger; Peter A Argenta; Melissa A Geller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 9.  Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome in the first year of colorectal cancer: a review of the psychological impact.

Authors:  Karin M Landsbergen; Judith B Prins; Han G Brunner; Floris W Kraaimaat; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Colorectal cancer in the family: psychosocial distress and social issues in the years following genetic counselling.

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Fred H Menko; Irma Kluijt; Babs G Taal; Miranda A Gerritsma; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.