Literature DB >> 21931068

Helping patients decide: ten steps to better risk communication.

Angela Fagerlin1, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher, Peter A Ubel.   

Abstract

With increasing frequency, patients are being asked to make complex decisions about cancer screening, prevention, and treatment. These decisions are fraught with emotion and cognitive difficulty simultaneously. Many Americans have low numeracy skills making the cognitive demands even greater whenever, as is often the case, patients are presented with risk statistics and asked to make comparisons between the risks and benefits of multiple options and to make informed medical decisions. In this commentary, we highlight 10 methods that have been empirically shown to improve patients' understanding of risk and benefit information and/or their decision making. The methods range from presenting absolute risks using frequencies (rather than presenting relative risks) to using a risk format that clarifies how treatment changes risks from preexisting baseline levels to using plain language. We then provide recommendations for how health-care providers and health educators can best to communicate this complex medical information to patients, including using plain language, pictographs, and absolute risks instead of relative risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21931068      PMCID: PMC3218625          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  42 in total

Review 1.  The visual communication of risk.

Authors:  I M Lipkus; J G Hollands
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1999

2.  Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres.

Authors:  John E Wennberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-10-26

3.  Context and the interpretation of likelihood information: the role of intergroup comparisons on perceived vulnerability.

Authors:  Paul D Windschitl; René Martin; Annette R Flugstad
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-05

4.  Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer.

Authors:  P M Ravdin; L A Siminoff; G J Davis; M B Mercer; J Hewlett; N Gerson; H L Parker
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The benefits of discussing adjuvant therapies one at a time instead of all at once.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Andrea M Angott; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Frequency or probability? A qualitative study of risk communication formats used in health care.

Authors:  M M Schapira; A B Nattinger; C A McHorney
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  A randomized comparison of patients' understanding of number needed to treat and other common risk reduction formats.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Michael P Pignone; Carmen L Lewis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  "Is 28% good or bad?" Evaluability and preference reversals in health care decisions.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Fagerlin; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Patient education materials about the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer: a critical review.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; David Rovner; Sue Stableford; Christophir Jentoft; John T Wei; Margaret Holmes-Rovner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: how presentation of recurrence risk influences decision-making.

Authors:  Celia Chao; Jamie L Studts; Troy Abell; Terence Hadley; Lynne Roetzer; Sean Dineen; Doug Lorenz; Ahmed YoussefAgha; Kelly M McMasters
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  190 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults.

Authors:  Jennifer K Maratt; Audrey H Calderwood
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06

2.  Does Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Testing and Counseling Reduce Modifiable Risk Factors? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Veterans.

Authors:  Corrine I Voils; Cynthia J Coffman; Janet M Grubber; David Edelman; Azita Sadeghpour; Matthew L Maciejewski; Jamiyla Bolton; Alex Cho; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; William S Yancy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Clinicians' Perspectives on Barriers and Enablers of Optimal Prescribing in Patients with Dementia and Coexisting Conditions.

Authors:  Ariel R Green; Patricia Lee; Emily Reeve; Jennifer L Wolff; Chi Chiung Grace Chen; Rachel Kruzan; Cynthia M Boyd
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

4.  Patient and physician views on providing cancer patient-specific survival information.

Authors:  Nancy L Solowski; Oluwafunmilola T Okuyemi; Dorina Kallogjeri; Joyce Nicklaus; Jay F Piccirillo
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Social comparison framing in health news and its effect on perceptions of group risk.

Authors:  Cabral A Bigman
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2013-07-05

Review 6.  Implementing risk-aligned bladder cancer surveillance care.

Authors:  Florian R Schroeck; Nicholas Smith; Jeremy B Shelton
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  Shared Decision Making in Patients With Suspected Uncomplicated Ureterolithiasis: A Decision Aid Development Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Connor Houghton; Pooja M Patel; Leanora W Merwin; Kye P Poronsky; Anna L Caroll; Carol Sánchez Santana; Maggie Breslin; Charles D Scales; Peter K Lindenauer; Kathleen M Mazor; Erik P Hess
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2020-02-16       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Barriers to information provision regarding breast cancer and its treatment.

Authors:  Heather J Campbell-Enns; Roberta L Woodgate; Harvey M Chochinov
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Keeping the patient in the center: Common challenges in the practice of shared decision making.

Authors:  Kimberly A Fisher; Andy S L Tan; Daniel D Matlock; Barry Saver; Kathleen M Mazor; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-08-06

10.  Estimating and communicating prognosis in advanced neurologic disease.

Authors:  Robert G Holloway; Robert Gramling; Adam G Kelly
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.