Literature DB >> 29385581

Genetic test reporting of CDKN2A provides informational and motivational benefits for managing melanoma risk.

Lisa G Aspinwall1, Tammy K Stump1, Jennifer M Taber1, Danielle M Drummond1, Wendy Kohlmann2, Marjan Champine2, Sancy A Leachman3.   

Abstract

A CDKN2A/p16 mutation confers 28%-67% lifetime melanoma risk, a risk that may be moderated by ultraviolet radiation exposure. The aim of this study was to test whether melanoma genetic counseling and test disclosure conferred unique informational, motivational, or emotional benefits compared to family history-based counseling. Participants included were 114 unaffected members of melanoma-prone families, ages 16-69, 51.8% men, 65.8% with minor children or grandchildren. Carriers (n = 28) and noncarriers (n = 41) from families with a CDKN2A mutation were compared to no-test controls (n = 45) from melanoma-prone families without an identifiable CDKN2A mutation. All participants received equivalent counseling about melanoma risk and management; only CDKN2A participants received genetic test results. Using newly developed inventories, participants rated perceived costs and benefits for managing their own and their children's or grandchildren's melanoma risk 1 month and 1 year after counseling. Propensity scores controlled for baseline family differences. Compared to no-test controls, participants who received test results (carriers and noncarriers) reported feeling significantly more informed and prepared to manage their risk, and carriers reported greater motivation to reduce sun exposure. All groups reported low negative emotions about melanoma risk. Parents reported high levels of preparedness to manage children's risk regardless of group. Carrier parents reported greater (but moderate) worry about their children's risk than no-test control parents. Women, older, and more educated respondents reported greater informational and motivational benefits regardless of group. Genetic test results were perceived as more informative and motivating for personal sun protection efforts than equivalent counseling based on family history alone. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CDKN2A/p16; Familial melanoma; Genetic counseling and testing; Skin self-examinations; Sun-protection behavior; Ultraviolet radiation exposure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29385581      PMCID: PMC6065541          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibx011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  47 in total

1.  Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores.

Authors:  S T Normand; M B Landrum; E Guadagnoli; J Z Ayanian; T J Ryan; P D Cleary; B J McNeil
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Melanoma knowledge, perception, and awareness in ethnic minorities in Chicago: recommendations regarding education.

Authors:  June K Robinson; Komal M Joshi; Sara Ortiz; Roopal V Kundu
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Self-Regulation Principles Underlying Risk Perception and Decision Making within the Context of Genomic Testing.

Authors:  Linda D Cameron; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Ellen Peters; Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2017-05-05

4.  Essential elements of genetic cancer risk assessment, counseling, and testing: updated recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Bronson D Riley; Julie O Culver; Cécile Skrzynia; Leigha A Senter; June A Peters; Josephine W Costalas; Faith Callif-Daley; Sherry C Grumet; Katherine S Hunt; Rebecca S Nagy; Wendy C McKinnon; Nancie M Petrucelli; Robin L Bennett; Angela M Trepanier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire.

Authors:  David Cella; Chanita Hughes; Amy Peterman; Chih-Hung Chang; Beth N Peshkin; Marc D Schwartz; Lari Wenzel; Amy Lemke; Alfred C Marcus; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Melanoma genetic counseling and test reporting improve screening adherence among unaffected carriers 2 years later.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Jennifer M Taber; Samantha L Leaf; Wendy Kohlmann; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Validation of a self-concept scale for Lynch syndrome in different nationalities.

Authors:  Helle Vendel Petersen; Katarina Domanska; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Jiahui Wong; Christina Carlsson; Inge Bernstein; Mary Jane Esplen; Mef Nilbert
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Genetic testing for hereditary melanoma and pancreatic cancer: a longitudinal study of psychological outcome.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Jennifer M Taber; Samantha L Leaf; Wendy Kohlmann; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 9.  Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours.

Authors:  Theresa M Marteau; David P French; Simon J Griffin; A T Prevost; Stephen Sutton; Clare Watkinson; Sophie Attwood; Gareth J Hollands
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

Review 10.  The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; David P French; Simon J Griffin; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton; Sarah King; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-03-15
View more
  9 in total

1.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Clinical and Public Health Genomics: Opportunities for translational behavioral medicine research, practice, and policy.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Michael J Hall; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Interest and Uptake of MC1R Testing for Melanoma Risk in a Diverse Primary Care Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Kate Zielaskowski; Kirsten Meyer White; Kimberly Kaphingst; Erika Robers; Dolores Guest; Andrew Sussman; Yvonne Talamantes; Matthew Schwartz; Vivian M Rodríguez; Yuelin Li; Elizabeth Schofield; Jessica Bigney; Keith Hunley; David Buller; Marianne Berwick
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 10.282

3.  Interactive Beliefs about Genes and Behavior Predict Improved Sun Protection Following Melanoma Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Danielle M Drummond; Tammy K Stump; Wendy K Kohlmann; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2022-08-02

4.  Priority of Risk (But Not Perceived Magnitude of Risk) Predicts Improved Sun-Protection Behavior Following Genetic Counseling for Familial Melanoma.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; Lisa G Aspinwall; Danielle M Drummond; Tammy K Stump; Wendy Kohlmann; Marjan Champine; Pamela Cassidy; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2021-02-12

5.  Genetic Test Reporting and Counseling for Melanoma Risk in Minors May Improve Sun Protection Without Inducing Distress.

Authors:  Tammy K Stump; Lisa G Aspinwall; Wendy Kohlmann; Marjan Champine; Jamie Hauglid; Yelena P Wu; Emily Scott; Pamela Cassidy; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Exploring Prostate Cancer Patients' Interest and Preferences for Receiving Genetic Risk Information About Cancer Aggressiveness.

Authors:  Siddhartha Roy; Clement K Gwede; Teri L Malo; Courtney L Scherr; Selina Radlein; Cathy D Meade; Susan T Vadaparampil; Jong Y Park
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2020 May-Jun

7.  Daily Minutes of Unprotected Sun Exposure (MUSE) Inventory: Measure description and comparisons to UVR sensor and sun protection survey data.

Authors:  Tammy K Stump; Lisa G Aspinwall; Elizabeth L Gray; Shuai Xu; Nenita Maganti; Sancy A Leachman; Nabil Alshurafa; June K Robinson
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-07-24

8.  Genetic polymorphisms may influence the vertical growth rate of melanoma.

Authors:  Mariusz Sikora; Lidia Rudnicka; Barbara Borkowska; Agnieszka Kardynał; Monika Słowińska; Adriana Rakowska; Olga Warszawik-Hendzel; Anna Wiergowska; Iwona Ługowska; Piotr Rutkowski; Tadeusz Dębniak; Jan Lubiński; Małgorzata Olszewska
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 9.  Considerations for Germline Testing in Melanoma: Updates in Behavioral Change and Pancreatic Surveillance for Carriers of CDKN2A Pathogenic Variants.

Authors:  Kristen Pauley; Ambreen Khan; Wendy Kohlmann; Joanne Jeter
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.