Literature DB >> 2922015

The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.

G L Goyert1, S F Bottoms, M C Treadwell, P C Nehra.   

Abstract

To investigate the influence of physicians' practice styles on the rate of deliveries by cesarean section, we studied 1533 affluent women at low risk of obstetrical complications who were cared for by 11 obstetricians in a single community hospital. The mean rate of delivery by cesarean section was 26.9 percent, but the rate ranged from 19.1 to 42.3 percent, according to the physician. The mean rate of primary cesarean section (i.e., the rate for women without previous cesarean deliveries) was 17.2, with a range of 9.6 to 31.8 percent. A stepwise logistic-regression model of the determinants of primary cesarean section, including the individual physician, parity, birth weight, and maternal age and excluding specific medical indications, showed that only nulliparity (P less than 0.0001) was more important than the identity of the physician (P less than 0.001) in its influence on the rate of cesarean section. Variation in cesarean-section rates among physicians was not attributable to the practice setting, the patient population, the degree of obstetrical risk, or the physician's recent medicolegal experience, and it was not accompanied by corresponding differences in neonatal outcome. We conclude that individual practice style may be an important determinant of the wide variations in the rates of cesarean delivery among obstetricians. Our data do not permit us to say with certainty whether the procedure is overused by some obstetricians or underused by others, but we found no obvious differences in neonatal outcome associated with differences in the cesarean-section rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2922015     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198903163201106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  35 in total

1.  Provider distribution and variations in statewide cesarean section rates.

Authors:  W J Hueston; S Lewis-Stevenson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2001-02

2.  The effect of income pooling within a call group on rates of obstetric intervention.

Authors:  E S Bland; L W Oppenheimer; P Holmes; S W Wen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Beyond the simple economics of cesarean section birthing: women's resistance to social inequality.

Authors:  Dominique P Béhague
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2002-12

4.  Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Authors:  Darren Grant
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

5.  Defensive medicine practices among gastroenterologists in Japan.

Authors:  Toru Hiyama; Masaharu Yoshihara; Shinji Tanaka; Yuji Urabe; Yoshihiko Ikegami; Tatsuma Fukuhara; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Cesarean section rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: an analysis based on birth certificates.

Authors:  R Bertollini; D DiLallo; T Spadea; C Perucci
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  The cesarean birth rate: influence of hospital teaching status.

Authors:  D M Oleske; G L Glandon; G J Giacomelli; S F Hohmann
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Adherence to conservative management recommendations for abnormal pap test results in adolescents.

Authors:  Rebecca B Perkins; Jennifer R Jorgensen; Molly E McCoy; Sharon M Bak; Tracy A Battaglia; Karen M Freund
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Placing patients in the queue for coronary revascularization: evidence for practice variations from an expert panel process.

Authors:  C D Naylor; A Basinski; R S Baigrie; B S Goldman; J Lomas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  What is the optimal caesarean section rate? An outcome based study of existing variation.

Authors:  M Joffe; J Chapple; C Paterson; R W Beard
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.