Literature DB >> 29196840

Conception of the Lübeck Toolbox curriculum for basic minimally invasive surgery skills.

Tilman Laubert1, Hamed Esnaashari2, Paul Auerswald2, Anna Höfer2, Michael Thomaschewski2, Hans-Peter Bruch2, Tobias Keck2, Claudia Benecke2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Difficulties at the beginning of the learning curve in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) can well be overcome by simulation outside the operating room. Despite a great number of available devices, standardized, structured, and validated training curricula for video simulators are scarce.
METHODS: The Lübeck Toolbox (LTB) video trainer provides six training modules and online video tutorials. Proficiency levels for the tasks were defined by performance analysis of MIS experts (n = 15). Mean values of the best performed repetitions were set as benchmarks for a validation study with n = 30 MIS novices and the learning curves calculated. The novices performed a cholecystectomy on a pig organ model before and after the curriculum which were analyzed using the GOALS score.
RESULTS: Benchmarks defined by expert performance for the task Nos. 1 to 6 were 72 s (± 8) (Pack Your Luggage), 49 s (± 9) (Weaving), 66 s (± 10) (Chinese Jump Rope), 89 s (± 28) (Triangle Cut), 138 s (± 44) (Hammer Cut), and 98 (± 22) (Suturing). The median numbers of required repetitions by the novices to reach the proficiency level were n = 42 (7-80), n = 26 (9-55), n = 32 (14-77), n = 44 (15-59), n = 19 (6-68), and n = 26 (15-60). These values were all located at the beginning of the plateau phase of the learning curves. GOALS score improved significantly after completion of the curriculum (18.0 (± 2.6) vs. 10.9 (± 1.6), p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The LTB curriculum constitutes a new highly standardized and proficiency level-based training program for basic skills in MIS. Transferability of the task content to a (sub)-realistic environment could be demonstrated. Still, future trials will have to further validate the effectiveness of the LTB curriculum.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Education; Laparoscopy; Lübeck Toolbox; Minimally invasive surgery; Simulation; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29196840     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-017-1642-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  30 in total

1.  Practice distribution in procedural skills training: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Mackay; P Morgan; V Datta; A Chang; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Performance goals on simulators boost resident motivation and skills laboratory attendance.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; Christina E Acker; Frederick L Greene
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 4.  Industry Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials in General and Abdominal Surgery: An Empirical Study.

Authors:  Pascal Probst; Phillip Knebel; Kathrin Grummich; Solveig Tenckhoff; Alexis Ulrich; Markus W Büchler; Markus K Diener
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  Melina C Vassiliou; Liane S Feldman; Christopher G Andrew; Simon Bergman; Karen Leffondré; Donna Stanbridge; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 6.  Validity evidence for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program as an assessment tool: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin Zendejas; Raaj K Ruparel; David A Cook
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Multicenter proficiency benchmarks for advanced laparoscopic suturing tasks.

Authors:  Elif Bilgic; Yusuke Watanabe; Dmitry Nepomnayshy; Aimee Gardner; Shimae Fitzgibbons; Iman Ghaderi; Adnan Alseidi; Dimitrios Stefanidis; John Paige; Neal Seymour; Katherine M McKendy; Richard Birkett; James Whitledge; Erica Kane; Nicholas E Anton; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Validation of the mobile serious game application Touch Surgery™ for cognitive training and assessment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Jonathan D Hendrie; Mona W Schmidt; Tanja Proctor; Sai Paul; Carly R Garrow; Hannes G Kenngott; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Face validity of the pulsatile organ perfusion trainer for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Florian Rehberger; Jonathan David Hendrie; Benjamin Friedrich Berthold Mayer; Hannes Götz Kenngott; Vasile Bintintan; Georg Richard Linke; Lars Fischer; Beat Peter Müller-Stich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Virtual reality training for endoscopic surgery: voluntary or obligatory?

Authors:  K W van Dongen; W A van der Wal; I H M Borel Rinkes; M P Schijven; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  7 in total

1.  Impact of one-to-one tutoring on fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) passing rate in a single center experience outside the United States: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Federico Gheza; Paolo Raimondi; Leonardo Solaini; Federico Coccolini; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Nazario Portolani; Guido Alberto Massimo Tiberio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Optimizing laparoscopic training efficacy by 'deconstruction into key steps': a randomized controlled trial with novice medical students.

Authors:  A Widder; J Backhaus; A Wierlemann; I Hering; S Flemming; M Hankir; C-T Germer; A Wiegering; J F Lock; S König; F Seyfried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 3.  Surgical Site Infection Following Single-Port Appendectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Franziska Köhler; Lena Reese; Carolin Kastner; Anne Hendricks; Sophie Müller; Johan F Lock; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Armin Wiegering
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-08

4.  Testing Distinct Three-Dimensional Effects in Laparoscopy: A Prospective Randomized Trial Using the Lübecker Toolbox Curriculum.

Authors:  Michael Thomaschewski; Thorsten Jürgens; Claudia Benecke; Anna-Catherina Griesmann; Hamed Esnaashari; Romy Lux; Diana Scheppan; Ronja Simon; Tobias Keck; Tilman Laubert
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-02-24

5.  Efficacy of goal-directed minimally invasive surgery simulation training with the Lübeck Toolbox-Curriculum prior to first operations on patients: Study protocol for a multi-centre randomized controlled validation trial (NOVICE).

Authors:  Michael Thomaschewski; Tilman Laubert; Markus Zimmermann; Hamed Esnaashari; Reinhard Vonthein; Tobias Keck; Claudia Benecke
Journal:  Int J Surg Protoc       Date:  2020-03-14

6.  Changes in attentional resources during the acquisition of laparoscopic surgical skills.

Authors:  M Thomaschewski; M Heldmann; J C Uter; D Varbelow; T F Münte; T Keck
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-03-05

7.  Must Clinics Replace 2D by 3D Environments for an Efficient Training of Laparoscopic Novices? A Critical Analysis of the Learning Curve for Basic Skills.

Authors:  Maik Sahm; Clara Danzer; Alexis Leonhard Grimm; Christian Herrmann; Rene Mantke
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.