Literature DB >> 29644465

Impact of one-to-one tutoring on fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) passing rate in a single center experience outside the United States: a randomized controlled trial.

Federico Gheza1, Paolo Raimondi2, Leonardo Solaini3, Federico Coccolini4, Gian Luca Baiocchi3, Nazario Portolani3, Guido Alberto Massimo Tiberio3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outside the US, FLS certification is not required and its teaching methods are not well standardized. Even if the FLS was designed as "stand alone" training system, most of Academic Institution offer support to residents during training. We present the first systematic application of FLS in Italy. Our aim was to evaluate the role of mentoring/coaching on FLS training in terms of the passing rate and global performance in the search for resource optimization.
METHODS: Sixty residents in general surgery, obstetrics & gynecology, and urology were selected to be enrolled in a randomized controlled trial, practicing FLS with the goal of passing a simulated final exam. The control group practiced exclusively with video material from SAGES, whereas the interventional group was supported by a mentor.
RESULTS: Forty-six subjects met the requirements and completed the trial. For the other 14 subjects no results are available for comparison. One subject for each group failed the exam, resulting in a passing rate of 95.7%, with no obvious differences between groups. Subgroup analysis did not reveal any difference between the groups for FLS tasks.
CONCLUSION: We confirm that methods other than video instruction and deliberate FLS practice are not essential to pass the final exam. Based on these results, we suggest the introduction of the FLS system even where a trained tutor is not available. This trial is the first single institution application of the FLS in Italy and one of the few experiences outside the US. Trial Number: NCT02486575 ( https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ).

Keywords:  FLS; Italy; Laparoscopy; Randomized trial; Training; Tutoring

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29644465     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6185-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  30 in total

1.  Predicting baseline laparoscopic surgery skills.

Authors:  A K Madan; C T Frantzides; W C Park; C L Tebbit; N V A Kumari; P J O'Leary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A competency-based virtual reality training curriculum for the acquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skill.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor Grantcharov; Krishna Moorthy; Julian Hance; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Mastery versus the standard proficiency target for basic laparoscopic skill training: effect on skill transfer and retention.

Authors:  Nicoleta O Kolozsvari; Pepa Kaneva; Chantalle Brace; Genevieve Chartrand; Marilou Vaillancourt; Jiguo Cao; Daniel Banaszek; Sebastian Demyttenaere; Melina C Vassiliou; Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Cost Comparison of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Training Completed With Standard Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Equipment versus Low-Cost Equipment.

Authors:  Brenton R Franklin; Sarah B Placek; Mercy D Wagner; Sarah M Haviland; Mary T O'Donnell; E Matthew Ritter
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.891

5.  FLS skill acquisition: a comparison of blocked vs interleaved practice.

Authors:  Steven B Goldin; Gregory T Horn; Michael J Schnaus; Mark Grichanik; Adam J Ducey; Charles Nofsinger; David J Hernandez; Murray L Shames; Raman P Singh; Michael T Brannick
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.891

6.  Beyond task time: automated measurement augments fundamentals of laparoscopic skills methodology.

Authors:  Timothy M Kowalewski; Lee W White; Thomas S Lendvay; Iris S Jiang; Robert Sweet; Andrew Wright; Blake Hannaford; Mika N Sinanan
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  A randomized controlled study to evaluate the role of video-based coaching in training laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  Pritam Singh; Rajesh Aggarwal; Muaaz Tahir; Philip H Pucher; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Coaching Surgeons: Is Culture Limiting Our Ability to Improve?

Authors:  Dorotea Mutabdzic; Maria Mylopoulos; Michael Lucas Murnaghan; Priyanka Patel; Nathan Zilbert; Natashia Seemann; Glenn Regehr; Carol-Anne Moulton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Criterion-based laparoscopic training reduces total training time.

Authors:  Willem M Brinkman; Sonja N Buzink; Leonidas Alevizos; Ignace H J T de Hingh; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Music experience influences laparoscopic skills performance.

Authors:  Tanner Boyd; Inkyung Jung; Kent Van Sickle; Wayne Schwesinger; Joel Michalek; Juliane Bingener
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.