Literature DB >> 35851816

Optimizing laparoscopic training efficacy by 'deconstruction into key steps': a randomized controlled trial with novice medical students.

A Widder1, J Backhaus2, A Wierlemann3, I Hering3, S Flemming3, M Hankir3, C-T Germer3, A Wiegering3, J F Lock3, S König4, F Seyfried3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simulator training is an effective way of acquiring laparoscopic skills but there remains a need to optimize teaching methods to accelerate learning. We evaluated the effect of the mental exercise 'deconstruction into key steps' (DIKS) on the time required to acquire laparoscopic skills.
METHODS: A randomized controlled trial with undergraduate medical students was implemented into a structured curricular laparoscopic training course. The intervention group (IG) was trained using the DIKS approach, while the control group (CG) underwent the standard course. Laparoscopic performance of all participants was video-recorded at baseline (t0), after the first session (t1) and after the second session (t2) nine days later. Two double-blinded raters assessed the videos. The Impact of potential covariates on performance (gender, age, prior laparoscopic experience, self-assessed motivation and self-assessed dexterity) was evaluated with a self-report questionnaire.
RESULTS: Both the IG (n = 58) and the CG (n = 68) improved their performance after each training session (p < 0.001) but with notable differences between sessions. Whereas the CG significantly improved their performance from t0 -t1 (p < 0.05), DIKS shortened practical exercise time by 58% so that the IG outperformed the CG from t1 -t2, (p < 0.05). High self-assessed motivation and dexterity associated with significantly better performance (p < 0.05). Male participants demonstrated significantly higher overall performance (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Mental exercises like DIKS can improve laparoscopic performance and shorten practice times. Given the limited exposure of surgical residents to simulator training, implementation of mental exercises like DIKS is highly recommended. Gender, self-assessed dexterity, and motivation all appreciably influence performance in laparoscopic training.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deconstruction into key steps; Laparoscopic course; Laparoscopic skills; Teaching methods

Year:  2022        PMID: 35851816     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09408-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  32 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic skills training and assessment.

Authors:  R Aggarwal; K Moorthy; A Darzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Initial laparoscopic basic skills training shortens the learning curve of laparoscopic suturing and is cost-effective.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; William W Hope; James R Korndorffer; Sarah Markley; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room.

Authors:  James R Korndorffer; J Bruce Dunne; Rafael Sierra; Dimitris Stefanidis; Cheri L Touchard; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Shunsuke Hosono; Yuichi Arimoto; Hiroshi Ohtani; Yoshitetsu Kanamiya
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  The Role of Manual Dexterity and Cognitive Functioning in Enhancing Resident Operative Autonomy.

Authors:  Saad Shebrain; Gulrez Mahmood; Gitonga Munene; Lisa Miller; John Collins; Robert Sawyer
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 6.  Teaching procedural skills.

Authors:  Teodor P Grantcharov; Richard K Reznick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-17

7.  A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report.

Authors:  Seigo Kitano; Norio Shiraishi; Kyuzo Fujii; Kazuhiro Yasuda; Masafumi Inomata; Yosuke Adachi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Short-term Outcomes of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy With D2 Lymphadenectomy to Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (KLASS-02-RCT).

Authors:  Hyuk-Joon Lee; Woo Jin Hyung; Han-Kwang Yang; Sang Uk Han; Young-Kyu Park; Ji Yeong An; Wook Kim; Hyoung-Il Kim; Hyung-Ho Kim; Seung Wan Ryu; Hoon Hur; Seong-Ho Kong; Gyu Seok Cho; Jin-Jo Kim; Do Joong Park; Keun Won Ryu; Young Woo Kim; Jong Won Kim; Joo-Ho Lee; Min-Chan Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by expert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese patients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Shinichi Sakuramoto; Keishi Yamashita; Shiro Kikuchi; Nobue Futawatari; Natsuya Katada; Masahiko Watanabe; Toshiyuki Okutomi; Guoqin Wang; Leon Bax
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  State of the evidence on simulation-based training for laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin Zendejas; Ryan Brydges; Stanley J Hamstra; David A Cook
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.