Literature DB >> 33719351

Heterosis and Hybrid Crop Breeding: A Multidisciplinary Review.

Marlee R Labroo1, Anthony J Studer1, Jessica E Rutkoski1.   

Abstract

Although hybrid crop varieties are among the most popular agricultural innovations, the rationale for hybrid crop breeding is sometimes misunderstood. Hybrid breeding is slower and more resource-intensive than inbred breeding, but it allows systematic improvement of a population by recurrent selection and exploitation of heterosis simultaneously. Inbred parental lines can identically reproduce both themselves and their F1 progeny indefinitely, whereas outbred lines cannot, so uniform outbred lines must be bred indirectly through their inbred parents to harness heterosis. Heterosis is an expected consequence of whole-genome non-additive effects at the population level over evolutionary time. Understanding heterosis from the perspective of molecular genetic mechanisms alone may be elusive, because heterosis is likely an emergent property of populations. Hybrid breeding is a process of recurrent population improvement to maximize hybrid performance. Hybrid breeding is not maximization of heterosis per se, nor testing random combinations of individuals to find an exceptional hybrid, nor using heterosis in place of population improvement. Though there are methods to harness heterosis other than hybrid breeding, such as use of open-pollinated varieties or clonal propagation, they are not currently suitable for all crops or production environments. The use of genomic selection can decrease cycle time and costs in hybrid breeding, particularly by rapidly establishing heterotic pools, reducing testcrossing, and limiting the loss of genetic variance. Open questions in optimal use of genomic selection in hybrid crop breeding programs remain, such as how to choose founders of heterotic pools, the importance of dominance effects in genomic prediction, the necessary frequency of updating the training set with phenotypic information, and how to maintain genetic variance and prevent fixation of deleterious alleles.
Copyright © 2021 Labroo, Studer and Rutkoski.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autogamous; dominance; genomic selection; heterosis; inbreeding depression; reciprocal recurrent genomic selection

Year:  2021        PMID: 33719351      PMCID: PMC7943638          DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.643761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Genet        ISSN: 1664-8021            Impact factor:   4.599


  157 in total

1.  Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model.

Authors:  C R Henderson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Heterosis.

Authors:  E M East
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1936-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Molecular mechanisms of epistasis within and between genes.

Authors:  Ben Lehner
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Recombination in diverse maize is stable, predictable, and associated with genetic load.

Authors:  Eli Rodgers-Melnick; Peter J Bradbury; Robert J Elshire; Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Charlotte B Acharya; Sharon E Mitchell; Chunhui Li; Yongxiang Li; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Hybrid wheat: quantitative genetic parameters and consequences for the design of breeding programs.

Authors:  Carl Friedrich Horst Longin; Manje Gowda; Jonathan Mühleisen; Erhard Ebmeyer; Ebrahim Kazman; Ralf Schachschneider; Johannes Schacht; Martin Kirchhoff; Yusheng Zhao; Jochen Christoph Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Heterosis and gene effects of multiplicative characters: theoretical relationships and experimental results from Vicia faba L.

Authors:  A E Melchinger; M Singh; W Link; H F Utz; E von Kittlitz
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Genomic Prediction of Single Crosses in the Early Stages of a Maize Hybrid Breeding Pipeline.

Authors:  Dnyaneshwar C Kadam; Sarah M Potts; Martin O Bohn; Alexander E Lipka; Aaron J Lorenz
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Genome-Based Identification of Heterotic Patterns in Rice.

Authors:  Ulrike Beukert; Zuo Li; Guozheng Liu; Yusheng Zhao; Nadhigade Ramachandra; Vilson Mirdita; Fabiano Pita; Klaus Pillen; Jochen Christoph Reif
Journal:  Rice (N Y)       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.783

9.  Simulation of heterosis in a genome-scale metabolic network provides mechanistic explanations for increased biomass production rates in hybrid plants.

Authors:  Michael Vacher; Ian Small
Journal:  NPJ Syst Biol Appl       Date:  2019-07-18

10.  Improving Short- and Long-Term Genetic Gain by Accounting for Within-Family Variance in Optimal Cross-Selection.

Authors:  Antoine Allier; Christina Lehermeier; Alain Charcosset; Laurence Moreau; Simon Teyssèdre
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  15 in total

1.  Improving genomic predictions with inbreeding and nonadditive effects in two admixed maize hybrid populations in single and multienvironment contexts.

Authors:  Morgane Roth; Aurélien Beugnot; Tristan Mary-Huard; Laurence Moreau; Alain Charcosset; Julie B Fiévet
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Genomic Prediction Methods Accounting for Nonadditive Genetic Effects.

Authors:  Luis Varona; Andres Legarra; Miguel A Toro; Zulma G Vitezica
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 3.  Crucial factors for the feasibility of commercial hybrid breeding in food crops.

Authors:  Emily M S Ter Steeg; Paul C Struik; Richard G F Visser; Pim Lindhout
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 17.352

Review 4.  Features and applications of haplotypes in crop breeding.

Authors:  Javaid Akhter Bhat; Deyue Yu; Abhishek Bohra; Showkat Ahmad Ganie; Rajeev K Varshney
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-11-04

Review 5.  Revisiting Plant Heterosis-From Field Scale to Molecules.

Authors:  Attiq Ur Rehman; Trang Dang; Shanzay Qamar; Amina Ilyas; Reemana Fatema; Madan Kafle; Zawar Hussain; Sara Masood; Shehyar Iqbal; Khurram Shahzad
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Strategies for Efficient Gene Editing in Protoplasts of Solanum tuberosum Theme: Determining gRNA Efficiency Design by Utilizing Protoplast (Research).

Authors:  Frida Meijer Carlsen; Ida Elisabeth Johansen; Zhang Yang; Ying Liu; Ida Nøhr Westberg; Nam Phuong Kieu; Bodil Jørgensen; Marit Lenman; Erik Andreasson; Kåre Lehmann Nielsen; Andreas Blennow; Bent Larsen Petersen
Journal:  Front Genome Ed       Date:  2022-01-20

Review 7.  Harnessing Crop Wild Diversity for Climate Change Adaptation.

Authors:  Andrés J Cortés; Felipe López-Hernández
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 8.  Rewiring Meiosis for Crop Improvement.

Authors:  Pallas Kuo; Olivier Da Ines; Christophe Lambing
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Parent-of-Origin Effects on Seed Size Modify Heterosis Responses in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Rosa Castillo-Bravo; Antoine Fort; Ronan Cashell; Galina Brychkova; Peter C McKeown; Charles Spillane
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Genetic Analysis for Resistance to Sclerotinia Stem Rot, Yield and Its Component Traits in Indian Mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss.].

Authors:  Manjeet Singh; Ram Avtar; Neeraj Kumar; Rakesh Punia; Ajay Pal; Nita Lakra; Nisha Kumari; Dalip Kumar; Anu Naruka; Mahavir Bishnoi; Rajbir Singh Khedwal; Raju Ram Choudhary; Anoop Singh; Ravindra Kumar Meena; Ankit Dhillon; Vivek K Singh
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.