Literature DB >> 29155806

Anogenital distance as a phenotypic signature through infancy.

Lærke Priskorn1, Jørgen H Petersen2, Niels Jørgensen1, Henriette B Kyhl3, Marianne S Andersen4, Katharina M Main1, Anna-Maria Andersson1, Niels E Skakkebaek1, Tina K Jensen5.   

Abstract

BackgroundAnogenital distance (AGD) has been suggested to represent a phenotypic signature reflecting in utero androgen action. However, it is not known whether an individual's AGD at birth correlates to the AGD later in life. We investigate correlations of AGD between 3 and 18 months of age and assess reproducibility of measurements.MethodsWe measured AGD from anus to scrotum (AGDas) and to penis (AGDap) in 407 boys, and to posterior fourchette (AGDaf) and clitoris (AGDac) in 282 girls. Each measure was repeated three times at 3 and 18 months of age, and some children were, furthermore, examined by two different examiners. We assessed age-related changes and reproducibility of measurements.ResultsAGD increased between the two examinations and correlated within the child. A large proportion of the observed variation in AGD was due to true differences between the children (AGDas: 62%, AGDap: 40%, AGDaf: 30%, AGDac: 21%), and measurement error due to between- and within-examiner variation was low.ConclusionsOur study showed that measures of AGD within a child correlated during infancy, especially in boys and particularly for AGD measured as the distance between anus and scrotum. A planned cohort follow-up through childhood and puberty will reveal whether AGD represents a phenotypic signature throughout life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29155806     DOI: 10.1038/pr.2017.287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Res        ISSN: 0031-3998            Impact factor:   3.756


  40 in total

1.  The Odense Child Cohort: aims, design, and cohort profile.

Authors:  Henriette Boye Kyhl; Tina Kold Jensen; Torben Barington; Susanne Buhl; Lene Annette Norberg; Jan Stener Jørgensen; Ditlev Frank Granhøj Jensen; Henrik Thybo Christesen; Ronald F Lamont; Steffen Husby
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.980

2.  Caucasian male infants and boys with hypospadias exhibit reduced anogenital distance.

Authors:  Michael H Hsieh; Michael L Eisenberg; Adam B Hittelman; Jason M Wilson; Gregory E Tasian; Laurence S Baskin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Shorter anogenital distance correlates with undescended testis: a detailed genital anthropometric analysis in human newborns.

Authors:  Viral G Jain; Arbinder Kumar Singal
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 4.  Disruption of reproductive development in male rat offspring following in utero exposure to phthalate esters.

Authors:  Paul M D Foster
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2005-08-11

5.  Endometriomas and deep infiltrating endometriosis in adulthood are strongly associated with anogenital distance, a biomarker for prenatal hormonal environment.

Authors:  Jaime Mendiola; María L Sánchez-Ferrer; Raquel Jiménez-Velázquez; Laura Cánovas-López; Ana I Hernández-Peñalver; Shiana Corbalán-Biyang; Ana Carmona-Barnosi; María T Prieto-Sánchez; Aníbal Nieto; Alberto M Torres-Cantero
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Anogenital distance is related to ovarian follicular number in young Spanish women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jaime Mendiola; Manuela Roca; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Maria-Pilar Mira-Escolano; José J López-Espín; Emily S Barrett; Shanna H Swan; Alberto M Torres-Cantero
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Decrease in anogenital distance among male infants with prenatal phthalate exposure.

Authors:  Shanna H Swan; Katharina M Main; Fan Liu; Sara L Stewart; Robin L Kruse; Antonia M Calafat; Catherine S Mao; J Bruce Redmon; Christine L Ternand; Shannon Sullivan; J Lynn Teague
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: a descriptive, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Eduardo Salazar-Martinez; Patricia Romano-Riquer; Edith Yanez-Marquez; Matthew P Longnecker; Mauricio Hernandez-Avila
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  Human anogenital distance: an update on fetal smoke-exposure and integration of the perinatal literature on sex differences.

Authors:  Paul A Fowler; Panagiotis Filis; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Bruno le Bizec; Jean-Philippe Antignac; Marie-Line Morvan; Amanda J Drake; Ugo Soffientini; Peter J O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Prenatal Exposure to Phthalates and Anogenital Distance in Male Infants from a Low-Exposed Danish Cohort (2010-2012).

Authors:  Tina Kold Jensen; Hanne Frederiksen; Henriette Boye Kyhl; Tina Harmer Lassen; Shanna H Swan; Carl-Gustaf Bornehag; Niels E Skakkebaek; Katharina M Main; Dorte Vesterholm Lind; Steffen Husby; Anna-Maria Andersson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  7 in total

1.  Anogenital Distance in Healthy Infants: Method-, Age- and Sex-related Reference Ranges.

Authors:  Margit Bistrup Fischer; Marie Lindhardt Ljubicic; Casper P Hagen; Ajay Thankamony; Ken Ong; Ieuan Hughes; Tina Kold Jensen; Katharina M Main; Jørgen Holm Petersen; Alexander S Busch; Emmie N Upners; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Shanna H Swan; Anders Juul
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Prenatal Androgen Exposure and Traits of Autism Spectrum Disorder in the Offspring: Odense Child Cohort.

Authors:  Camilla V B Palm; Dorte Glintborg; Laura G Find; Pia V Larsen; Cilia M Dalgaard; Henriette Boye; Tina K Jensen; Anja F Dreyer; Marianne S Andersen; Niels Bilenberg
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2022-02-06

3.  Clinical aspects of histological and hormonal parameters in boys with cryptorchidism: Thesis for PhD degree.

Authors:  Simone Engmann Hildorf
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 3.428

4.  Association of pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with neonatal anogenital distance in a Chinese birth cohort.

Authors:  Zhiyang Wang; Jinbo Niu; Honglei Ji; Maohua Miao; Limei Yang; Xia Chen; Xiufeng Li; Xiuxia Song; Aimin Chen; Hong Liang; Wei Yuan
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.355

5.  Anogenital distance is associated with semen quality but not reproductive hormones in 1106 young men from the general population.

Authors:  L Priskorn; A K Bang; L Nordkap; M Krause; J Mendiola; T K Jensen; A Juul; N E Skakkebaek; S H Swan; N Jørgensen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Androgens and the masculinization programming window: human-rodent differences.

Authors:  Richard M Sharpe
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 5.407

7.  Association Between Neonatal Thyroid Function and Anogenital Distance from Birth to 48 Months of Age.

Authors:  Min Luan; Hong Liang; Guanghong Fang; Ziliang Wang; Xiujuan Su; Aimin Chen; Maohua Miao; Wei Yuan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 5.555

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.