Literature DB >> 22434852

Caucasian male infants and boys with hypospadias exhibit reduced anogenital distance.

Michael H Hsieh1, Michael L Eisenberg, Adam B Hittelman, Jason M Wilson, Gregory E Tasian, Laurence S Baskin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Animal models of endocrine dysfunction have associated male genital defects with reduced anogenital distance (AGD). Human studies have correlated shorter AGD with exposure to putative endocrine disruptors in the environment but have not examined AGD in hypospadiac boys. We measured AGD in boys with hypospadias and those with normal genitals.
METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on boys undergoing urologic procedures at the University of California San Francisco and the Children's Hospital of Oakland, CA, USA. Data included age, race, height, weight, BMI, urologic diagnoses and AGD. To minimize any potential effects of race on observed AGD, we examined only Caucasian boys. Differences between boys with hypospadias and those with normal genitals were examined through two-tailed Student's t-tests.
RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen Caucasian boys ranging in age from 4 to 86 months underwent AGD measurement, of which 42 and 77 were boys with normal genitals and hypospadias, respectively. The mean (±SD) AGD of boys with hypospadias was 67 ± 1.2 versus 73 ± 1 mm for boys with normal genitals (P = 0.002). In these age-unmatched patient groups, there were also differences in age, height and weight (P = 0.0001, 0.0002 and 0.0004, respectively). After age matching (all <2 years of age), boys with hypospadias (n= 26) still featured a shorter AGD than boys with normal genitals (n= 26; 62 ± 2 versus 68 ± 2 mm respectively, P = 0.033) but the differences in age, height and weight were no longer significant.
CONCLUSIONS: In humans, hypospadias may indeed be associated with reduced AGD. Additional studies are needed to corroborate these preliminary findings and to determine their etiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22434852      PMCID: PMC3357195          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  20 in total

1.  In utero exposure to the antiandrogen 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene (DDE) in relation to anogenital distance in male newborns from Chiapas, México.

Authors:  Matthew P Longnecker; Beth C Gladen; Lea A Cupul-Uicab; S Patricia Romano-Riquer; Jean-Phillipe Weber; Robert E Chapin; Mauricio Hernández-Avila
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development.

Authors:  Robert J Kuczmarski; Cynthia L Ogden; Shumei S Guo; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn; Katherine M Flegal; Zuguo Mei; Rong Wei; Lester R Curtin; Alex F Roche; Clifford L Johnson
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 11       Date:  2002-05

Review 3.  Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects.

Authors:  N E Skakkebaek; E Rajpert-De Meyts; K M Main
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Measurement and correlates of ano-genital distance in healthy, newborn infants.

Authors:  S Sathyanarayana; L Beard; C Zhou; R Grady
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2010-01-04

5.  Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy alters the anal position in male infants.

Authors:  Luisa Torres-Sanchez; Monica Zepeda; Mariano E Cebrián; Jaime Belkind-Gerson; Rosa M Garcia-Hernandez; Uri Belkind-Valdovinos; Lizbeth López-Carrillo
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 6.  Associations among hypospadias, cryptorchidism, anogenital distance, and endocrine disruption.

Authors:  Michael H Hsieh; Benjamin N Breyer; Michael L Eisenberg; Laurence S Baskin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  The relationship between anogenital distance, fatherhood, and fertility in adult men.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Michael H Hsieh; Rustin Chanc Walters; Ross Krasnow; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Shorter anogenital distance predicts poorer semen quality in young men in Rochester, New York.

Authors:  Jaime Mendiola; Richard W Stahlhut; Niels Jørgensen; Fan Liu; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Hypospadias and endocrine disruption: is there a connection?

Authors:  L S Baskin; K Himes; T Colborn
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Anogenital distance from birth to 2 years: a population study.

Authors:  Ajay Thankamony; Ken K Ong; David B Dunger; Carlo L Acerini; Ieuan A Hughes
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  24 in total

1.  Evidence for sexually dimorphic associations between maternal characteristics and anogenital distance, a marker of reproductive development.

Authors:  Emily S Barrett; Lauren E Parlett; J Bruce Redmon; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Regulatory decisions on endocrine disrupting chemicals should be based on the principles of endocrinology.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; John Peterson Myers; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 3.143

3.  Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of human and animal evidence of prenatal diethylhexyl phthalate exposure and changes in male anogenital distance.

Authors:  David C Dorman; Weihsueh Chiu; Barbara F Hales; Russ Hauser; Kamin J Johnson; Ellen Mantus; Susan Martel; Karen A Robinson; Andrew A Rooney; Ruthann Rudel; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Susan L Schantz; Katrina M Waters
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 6.393

4.  Anogenital distance and penile width measurements in The Infant Development and the Environment Study (TIDES): methods and predictors.

Authors:  Sheela Sathyanarayana; Richard Grady; J B Redmon; Kristy Ivicek; Emily Barrett; Sarah Janssen; Ruby Nguyen; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 1.830

5.  Stability of proposed biomarkers of prenatal androgen exposure over the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  E S Barrett; L E Parlett; S H Swan
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 6.  Testicular cancer: biology and biomarkers.

Authors:  Leendert H J Looijenga; Hans Stoop; Katharina Biermann
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  First trimester phthalate exposure and anogenital distance in newborns.

Authors:  S H Swan; S Sathyanarayana; E S Barrett; S Janssen; F Liu; R H N Nguyen; J B Redmon
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  The relationship between anogenital distance and the androgen receptor CAG repeat length.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Tung-Chin Hsieh; Alexander W Pastuszak; Matthew G McIntyre; Rustin C Walters; Dolores J Lamb; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Anogenital distance as a phenotypic signature through infancy.

Authors:  Lærke Priskorn; Jørgen H Petersen; Niels Jørgensen; Henriette B Kyhl; Marianne S Andersen; Katharina M Main; Anna-Maria Andersson; Niels E Skakkebaek; Tina K Jensen
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 10.  Anogenital distance and its application in environmental health research.

Authors:  Chunhua Liu; Xijin Xu; Xia Huo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.