Literature DB >> 27357299

Endometriomas and deep infiltrating endometriosis in adulthood are strongly associated with anogenital distance, a biomarker for prenatal hormonal environment.

Jaime Mendiola1, María L Sánchez-Ferrer2, Raquel Jiménez-Velázquez3, Laura Cánovas-López3, Ana I Hernández-Peñalver3, Shiana Corbalán-Biyang3, Ana Carmona-Barnosi3, María T Prieto-Sánchez2, Aníbal Nieto2, Alberto M Torres-Cantero4.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Is the length of the anogenital distance (AGD), a biomarker of the in-utero prenatal hormonal environment, associated with the presence of endometriomas and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Shorter AGD is associated with presence of endometriomas and DIE. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: It is debated whether hormonal exposure to estrogens in utero may be a risk factor for endometriosis in adulthood. AGD is a biomarker of prenatal hormonal environment and observational studies have shown an association between AGD and reproductive parameters in both sexes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This case-control study of 114 women with endometriosis (endometriomas and/or DIE) and 105 controls was conducted between September 2014 and May 2015. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Cases were attending the Endometriosis Unit of the Hospital. Prevalent as well as incident cases, diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), were included. Controls were women without endometriosis attending the gynecological outpatient clinic for routine gynecological exams. Participants completed health questionnaires, followed physical and gynecological examinations, including TVUS. Measurements from the anterior clitoral surface to the upper verge of the anus (AGDAC), and from the posterior fourchette to the upper verge of the anus (AGDAF) were obtained in all subjects. Unconditional multiple logistic regression was used to estimate the association between AGD measurements and presence of endometriomas and/or DIE while accounting for important confounders and covariates, including age, body mass index, vaginal delivery or episiotomy. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: AGDAF was related to presence of endometriomas and/or DIE. For all cases of endometriosis (endometriomas and DIE), women in the lowest tertile of the AGDAF distribution, compared with the upper tertile, were 7.6-times (95% CI 2.8-21.0; P-trend < 0.001) more likely to have endometriosis. With regard to DIE, women with AGDAF below the median, compared with those with AGDAF above the median, were 41.6-times (95% CI 3.9-438; P-value = 0.002) more likely to have endometriosis. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: In case-control studies, information and selection bias has to be ruled out. Physicians conducting the measurement were blind to the status of the patients. Controls came from the same population as the cases. We adjusted for known and suspected confounders and covariates, but the possibility of residual confounding or chance findings should always be considered. As with all observational studies, causal inference is limited. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: This study suggests that endometriosis, especially the DIE, might have a prenatal origin that may be traced back to the hormonal milieu in which the fetus develops. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST: This work was supported by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, ISCIII (AES), grant no. PI13/01237 and the Seneca Foundation, Murcia Regional Agency of Science and Technology, grant no. 19443/PI/14. The authors have no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anogenital distance; deep infiltrating endometriosis; endometriomas; endometriosis; estrogens; prenatal exposures

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27357299      PMCID: PMC5027925          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


Introduction

Endometriosis is a chronic estrogen-dependent disease characterized by endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterus, often in the peritoneal cavity (Vercellini ), with an estimated prevalence of about 10%, and affecting 4–30% of women during their reproductive years (Leibson ; Buck Louis ). Women present chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia or infertility (Mahmood ; Denny and Mann, 2007), that can be incapacitating and can negatively affect their quality of life (Jones ). Intrauterine etiology and early-life influences are one of the etiological hypotheses being investigated for endometriosis (Missmer ; Hediger ; Buck Louis , 2013; Rizner, 2009; Somigliana ; Wolff ; Ferrero ; Upson ; Vannuccini ). Anogenital distance (AGD) is a sexually dimorphic feature, which is almost twice as long in males than in females, and a biomarker of prenatal hormonal environment (Greenham and Greenham, 1977; Kurzrock ). In observational studies, AGD is a biomarker of prenatal exposure to endocrine disruptors (Swan , 2015; Bornehag ) and androgens during the formation of the reproductive system (Dean and Sharpe, 2013; Jain and Singal, 2013). Prenatal exposure to stressful life events result in a longer (more masculine) AGD in infant girls (Barrett ), while exposure to anti-androgens results in a shorter (more feminine) AGD in infant males (Swan , 2015). In adult women, AGD length is associated with female reproductive function (Mendiola ; Mira-Escolano ,b; Barrett ). We hypothesize that a prenatal estrogenic environment resulting in relatively shorter AGD will be associated with higher endometriosis risk. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between AGD measurements, as a biomarker of intrautero hormonal milieu, and the presence of endometriomas and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) in adulthood.

Materials and Methods

Study population

This case–control study conducted from September 2014 to May 2015 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the University Hospital ‘Virgen de la Arrixaca’ in the Murcia Region (Spain). Patients were excluded from the study if they were pregnant, or having with oncological treatment or genitourinary prolapse. The age range was 18–50 years of age. Cases (n = 114) were women attending the Endometriosis Unit of the Hospital, and included prevalent and newly diagnosed cases. Diagnoses were established by medical history, and confirmed by ultrasounds [e.g. endometriotic cyst (endometriomas) or DIE] (Eskenazi ; Abrao ; Hsu ; Somigliana ; Johnson and Hummelshoj, 2013; Vercellini ). Deep endometriosis was defined as endometriosis infiltrating the peritoneum by >5 mm. Therefore, women with endometriosis were further classified as endometriomas (n = 82) and DIE  (n = 32) using symptoms, signs and ultrasound findings. When a patient presented both types of endometriosis (DIE and endometriomas), she was classified as DIE. Controls were women without endometriosis attending the gynecological outpatient clinic for routine exams (n = 105). Nine controls reported clinical symptoms compatible with endometriosis but the diagnosis was not confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. This study was approved by the Ethics Research Committee of the University of Murcia.

Gynecological history and physical examination

Cases and controls were interviewed in-person by gynecologists. All participants completed health questionnaires, gynecological and obstetrical histories, and underwent a gynecological examination including TVUS at a scheduled clinical visit. A visual analog scale (0 to 10) was used to measure endometriosis-associated pelvic pain (dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysuria and dyschezia) at the time of the exam (Vincent ). Height and weight were measured using a digital scale (Tanita SC 330-S, London, UK). Uterine and ovarian morphology were evaluated with TVUS (Voluson E-8® and 4–9 MHz transducer; General Electric Healthcare, USA). All women having disease were diagnosed by 2D, but for DIE cases, 3D was also used (30% of cases). Two gynecologists using the same methodology performed all clinical evaluations.

Anogenital measurements

Women lay in the lithotomy position with thighs at 45° to the examination table. Using a digital caliper (Stainless Steel Digital Caliper, VWR® International, LLC, West Chester, PA, USA), AGDAC was measured from the anterior clitoral surface to the upper verge of the anus, and AGDAF from the posterior fourchette to the upper verge of the anus (Fig. 1). Two gynecologists unaware of the patient’ gynecological status measured each distance three times. Average values of the six measurements were used in the analyses.
Figure 1

Landmarks for two measurements of anogenital distance (AGD): AGDAC, from the anterior clitoral surface to the upper verge of the anus (left) and AGDAF, from the posterior fourchette to the upper verge of the anus (right).

Landmarks for two measurements of anogenital distance (AGD): AGDAC, from the anterior clitoral surface to the upper verge of the anus (left) and AGDAF, from the posterior fourchette to the upper verge of the anus (right).

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics are presented using raw data. Continuous variables were compared using unpaired Student T tests, and categorical variables were compared with χ2 tests. Unconditional multiple logistic regression was used to explore the association between presence of endometriosis (endometriomas and/or DEI) (yes/no) and AGD (in tertiles from the whole distribution of cases and controls, with the highest tertile as reference category) using odds ratios (OR). Age (years) and BMI (kg/m2) were included as potential confounders in the model, and vaginal delivery and episiotomy were included as covariates as they may affect AGD. Tests for trend in the ORs across exposure strata for AGD measures were calculated using logistic models that included categorical terms as continuous variables. Coefficients of variation (%CV) were used to assess intra- and inter-examiner variability in AGD measurements. All tests were two-tailed at 0.05 significance level. Analyses were conducted with IBM SPSS 20.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, USA).

Results

For the whole population, cases were older and had had more birth deliveries than controls, but were similar for other demographic and lifestyle factors (Table I). AGDAC and AGDAF had normal distributions, were correlated [Pearson correlation (r) = 0.52, P < 0.001] and had a positive association with BMI (P-values < 0.01). Intra- and inter-examiner CV were 5% and 10% for AGDAF and AGDAC, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients were above 0.95 for both AGD measurements. Cases showed significantly shorter AGDAF compared with controls.
Table I

Comparison of the general characteristics of controls and cases of endometriomas and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).

CharacteristicsControls (n = 105)
All endometriosis (n = 114)
P-valuecDIE (n = 32)
P-valuecEndometriomas (n = 82)
P-valuec
MeanSDMedian5–95MeanSDMedian5–95MeanSDMedian5–95MeanSDMedian5–95
Age (years)29.76.031.020.0–39.036.27.537.022.9–48.0<0.00137.66.137.525.3–47.7<0.00135.87.836.521.9–48.5<0.001
Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2)23.85.422.217.6–36.223.53.822.518.5–30.80.4723.23.122.618.5–29.70.5823.64.022.518.4–31.20.53
Age at menarche (years)11.91.312.09.2–14.012.21.412.010.0–14.00.1612.11.912.09.0–14.00.1612.21.312.010.6–14.00.16
Anogenital distance (AGDAF) (mm)27.35.726.218.9–38.923.55.822.315.3–33.8<0.00119.13.518.314.4–27.9<0.00125.35.624.618.2–35.20.02
Anogenital distance (AGDAC) (mm)75.711.773.658.1–99.473.812.172.955.6–95.60.2468.912.871.344.1–90.8<0.0175.711.475.658.3–97.50.99
Percentage (%)
Alcohol consumptiona74.575.30.9075.00.9675.30.90
Tobacco consumptionb39.251.50.0957.10.1350.00.15
Have had:
 Endometriosis surgery36.040.634.1
 Vaginal delivery21.041.20.00128.10.4746.30.001
 Episiotomy16.210.50.223.10.0713.40.60
Parity
 077.162.376.757.3
 116.917.96.722.7
 23.618.916.718.7
 3+2.40.91.3

AGDAF: Anogenital distance from the upper verge of the anus to the posterior fourchette.

AGDAC: Anogenital distance from the upper verge of the anus to the anterior clitoral surface.

SD: standard deviation; 5–95: 5th–95th percentile.

aDid you ever drink alcoholic beverages with a frequency of at least one a month?

bHave you ever smoked?

cT-student/Mann–Whitney U-test or χ2 test, compared with control subjects.

Comparison of the general characteristics of controls and cases of endometriomas and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). AGDAF: Anogenital distance from the upper verge of the anus to the posterior fourchette. AGDAC: Anogenital distance from the upper verge of the anus to the anterior clitoral surface. SD: standard deviation; 5–95: 5th–95th percentile. aDid you ever drink alcoholic beverages with a frequency of at least one a month? bHave you ever smoked? cT-student/Mann–Whitney U-test or χ2 test, compared with control subjects. Table II presents AGD measurements in tertiles (or by median for DIE) and ORs. AGDAF, but not AGDAC, was related to presence of endometriomas and/or DIE (P-values, <0.001–0.04) in the adjusted models. For all cases of endometriosis (endometriomas and DIE), women with AGDAF in the lowest compared with the upper tertile were 7.6-times (95% CI 2.8–21.0; P-trend < 0.001) more likely to have endometriosis (Fig. 2). The strength of the association decreased when the analysis was restricted to women with endometriomas (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.3–9.4; P-trend < 0.05). Women with DEI and AGDAF below the median were 41.6 times (95% CI 3.9–438; P-value = 0.002) more likely to have endometriosis than those above the median.
Table II

Odds ratio (OR) for cases of endometriomas and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) versus controls according to tertiles of AGD measures, taking the third tertile as a reference or divided by the median (for DIE).

All endometriosis (n = 114) versus controls (n = 105)
AGD in tertiles (median for each tertile)CasesControlsOdds ratioa (95% CI)P-trendOdds ratiob (95% CI)P-trendOdds ratioc (95% CI)P-trend
AGDAF
 3rd (31.1 mm)26481.0 (reference)1.0 (reference)1.0 (reference)
 2nd (24.8 mm)34381.7 (0.9–3.2)2.3 (1.1–5.2)1.8 (0.71–4.4)
 1st (19.7 mm)54195.2 (2.6–10.7)<0.0016.7 (2.6–16.9)<0.0017.6 (2.8–21.0)<0.001
AGDAC
 3rd (86.1 mm)37361.0 (reference)1.0 (reference)1.0 (reference)
 2nd (73.6 mm)36370.95 (0.50–1.8)1.3 (0.57–2.9)1.9 (0.75–4.6)
 1st (63.3 mm)41321.2 (0.65–2.4)0.681.8 (0.77–4.0)0.402.1 (0.82–5.2)0.26
Endometriomas (n = 82) versus controls (n = 105)
AGD in tertiles (median for each tertile)CasesControlsOdds ratioa (95% CI)P-trendOdds ratiob (95% CI)P-trendOdds ratioc (95% CI)P-trend
AGDAF
 3rd (31.8 mm)21431.0 (reference)1.0 (reference)1.0 (reference)
 2nd (25.5 mm)26351.5 (0.74–3.2)2.1 (0.87–5.1)1.7 (0.64–4.4)
 1st (21.1 mm)35272.7 (1.3–5.5)0.033.7 (1.5–9.3)0.023.5 (1.3–9.4)0.04
AGDAC
 3rd (86.6 mm)27351.0 (reference)1.0 (reference)1.0 (reference)
 2nd (74.3 mm)27360.97 (0.48–1.9)1.6 (0.69–3.8)2.0 (0.76–5.1)
 1st (65.1 mm)28341.1 (0.53–2.2)0.972.1 (0.88–5.2)0.242.6 (0.96–7.2)0.16
DIE (n = 32) versus controls (n = 105)
AGD divided by median (median for each group)CasesControlsOdds ratioa (95% CI)P-valueOdds ratiob (95% CI)P-valueOdds ratioc (95% CI)P-value
AGDAF
 2nd (30.1 mm)3651.0 (reference)1.0 (reference)1.0 (reference)
 1st (20.6 mm)294015.7 (4.5–54.9)<0.00124.4 (4.1–146)<0.00141.6 (3.9–438)0.002
AGDAC
 2nd (81.2 mm)12561.0 (reference)1.0 (reference)1.0 (reference)
 1st (67.5 mm)20491.9 (0.85–4.3)0.122.9 (0.85–10.4)0.092.6 (0.69–9.4)0.15

AGDAF: Anogenital distance from the upper verge of the anus to the posterior fourchette.

AGDAC: Anogenital distance from the upper verge of the anus to the anterior clitoral surface.

aUnadjusted OR.

bOR adjusted by age and BMI.

cOR adjusted by age, BMI, vaginal delivery and episiotomy.

Figure 2

Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) for the associations of tertiles [Longer (tertile 3), Medium (tertile 2) and Shorter (tertile 1)] of AGDAF measurements in relation to presence of all endometriosis (cases; n = 114 versus controls; n = 105).

Odds ratio (OR) for cases of endometriomas and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) versus controls according to tertiles of AGD measures, taking the third tertile as a reference or divided by the median (for DIE). AGDAF: Anogenital distance from the upper verge of the anus to the posterior fourchette. AGDAC: Anogenital distance from the upper verge of the anus to the anterior clitoral surface. aUnadjusted OR. bOR adjusted by age and BMI. cOR adjusted by age, BMI, vaginal delivery and episiotomy. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) for the associations of tertiles [Longer (tertile 3), Medium (tertile 2) and Shorter (tertile 1)] of AGDAF measurements in relation to presence of all endometriosis (cases; n = 114 versus controls; n = 105).

Discussion

We found a strong association between AGDAF and presence of endometriomas and DIE, suggesting that the intrauterine hormonal milieu during prenatal life may play an important role in the development of endometriosis. An increased rate of endometriosis was described in women prenatally exposed to diethylstilbestrol (Missmer ), and women who were regularly fed soy formula as infants were shown to have more than twice the risk of endometriosis compared with unexposed women (Upson ). It has been long argued that endometriosis, an estrogen-dependent disease, may have an intrauterine etiology (Missmer ; Hediger ; Buck Louis , 2013; Rizner, 2009). The development of the uterine endometrial gland begins in utero and is completed in puberty (Gray ). Early hormonal signaling disruptions may result in altered morphology and function from very early on. Evidence of endometriosis has been found in the autopsies of female human fetuses at various gestational ages (Signorile , 2012). In our study, we were not able to measure specific exposures in utero but prenatal exposure to monobutyl phthalate in amniotic fluid has been inversely correlated with the anogenital index in female infants (Huang ). Few studies have explored AGD in women. A longer AGD has been related to higher ovarian follicular number (Mendiola ) and to higher testosterone levels (Mira-Escolano ). Moreover, longer AGDAF in young women is associated with irregularities in their mother's menstrual cycle before pregnancy (Mira-Escolano ), suggesting that the prenatal environment may exert a long-lasting influence in the reproductive tract of female offspring. An altered female AGD may also be an important biomarker of the human ovarian dysgenesis syndrome (Buck Louis ). The current study showed significant associations with the presence of endometriomas and DIE for AGDAF, but not for AGDAC. There is not a clear interpretation for this difference at the moment. Similarly, almost all studies have reported associations for the short (equivalent) measurement (anus-scrotum) in males (Eisenberg ; Mendiola ) and females (Mira-Escolano ). However, it might be interesting and useful to take both measures, until a significant body of normative data has been accumulated in adults. Selection and measurement bias has to be considered. Controls were patients attending the public hospital in the same period, and they stem from the same population from which cases emerged. Although TVUS cannot replace surgery for the diagnosis of noninvasive endometriosis (Nisenblat ), TVUS has a relatively high values for sensitivity (93%) and specificity (96%) for endometriomas. Nonetheless, misclassification of disease status may have occurred, but, if present, it would contribute to underestimating the true magnitude of the association. AGD measures were performed by two gynecologists that were not members of the endometriosis unit and were unaware of the patient's status. AGD is an anthropometric measurement that for what is known (Thankamony ) may be stable across the lifespan of an individual. Therefore, the status of the case, prevalent versus incident, should not affect the relationship between AGD and presence of endometriomas and/or DIE. Recently, it has been reported that AGD in adult rats displays a certain degree of plasticity, which may be mediated by modulation of local androgen/estrogen activities (Mitchell ). However, it has also been shown that AGD is stable across the women's menstrual cycle (Barrett ). In conclusion, our results provide the first evidence of a strong association between a biomarker of hormonal prenatal environment in women and the presence of endometriomas and DIE. Nevertheless, we are cautious in interpreting the results of the associations between AGDAF and DIE, due to the unstable estimates of these relationships. Our results, if confirmed, have important implications for endometriosis in terms of prevention, clinical practice and future research.

Authors' roles

A.M.T.-C., L.C.-L., J.M., M.L.S.-F. and A.N. were involved in the study conception and design. L.C.-L., R.J.-V., A.I.H.-P., S.C.-B., A.C.-B., M.T.P.-S. and M.L.S.-F. were involved in study execution and acquisition of data. L.C.-L., M.L.S.-F., M.T.P.-S., J.M., A.N. and A.M.T.-C. contributed to data analysis and interpretation. J.M., M.L.S.-F. and A.M.T.-C. drafted the manuscript. All authors provided substantial intellectual contributions and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the , grants no PI13/01237 and the , grant no 19443/PI/14. Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, ISCIII (AES), grant no PI13/01237.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare.
  48 in total

1.  New evidence of the presence of endometriosis in the human fetus.

Authors:  Pietro G Signorile; Feliciano Baldi; Rossana Bussani; Mariarosaria D'Armiento; Maria De Falco; Mariarosaria Boccellino; Lucio Quagliuolo; Alfonso Baldi
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Incidence of endometriosis by study population and diagnostic method: the ENDO study.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Mary L Hediger; C Matthew Peterson; Mary Croughan; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Joseph Stanford; Zhen Chen; Victor Y Fujimoto; Michael W Varner; Ann Trumble; Linda C Giudice
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  In utero exposures and the incidence of endometriosis.

Authors:  Stacey A Missmer; Susan E Hankinson; Donna Spiegelman; Robert L Barbieri; Karin B Michels; David J Hunter
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Intrauterine exposures and risk of endometriosis.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Mary L Hediger; Josefa B Peña
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Early-life factors and endometriosis risk.

Authors:  Kristen Upson; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Delia Scholes; Victoria L Holt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  A mixture of the "antiandrogens" linuron and butyl benzyl phthalate alters sexual differentiation of the male rat in a cumulative fashion.

Authors:  A K Hotchkiss; L G Parks-Saldutti; J S Ostby; C Lambright; J Furr; J G Vandenbergh; L E Gray
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 4.285

7.  Menstrual symptoms in women with pelvic endometriosis.

Authors:  T A Mahmood; A A Templeton; L Thomson; C Fraser
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1991-06

Review 8.  Estrogen metabolism and action in endometriosis.

Authors:  Tea Lanisnik Rizner
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 4.102

9.  Consensus on current management of endometriosis.

Authors:  Neil P Johnson; Lone Hummelshoj
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Anogenital distance is related to ovarian follicular number in young Spanish women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jaime Mendiola; Manuela Roca; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Maria-Pilar Mira-Escolano; José J López-Espín; Emily S Barrett; Shanna H Swan; Alberto M Torres-Cantero
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 5.984

View more
  14 in total

1.  Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Quantification System.

Authors:  María Luisa Sánchez-Ferrer; María Teresa Prieto-Sánchez; Carlos Moya-Jiménez; Jaime Mendiola; Carmen María García-Hernández; Ana Carmona-Barnosi; Anibal Nieto; Alberto M Torres-Cantero
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Anogenital Distance and Endometriosis: Results of a Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Laura Buggio; Edgardo Somigliana; Greta Sergenti; Federica Ottolini; Dhouha Dridi; Paolo Vercellini
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Reference Values for and Correlation Analysis of the Anogenital Distance of Chinese Han Full-Term Singleton Neonates.

Authors:  Wei Cao; Xiaowei Ding; Zhiya Dong; Haiting Tang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.569

4.  Anogenital distance as a phenotypic signature through infancy.

Authors:  Lærke Priskorn; Jørgen H Petersen; Niels Jørgensen; Henriette B Kyhl; Marianne S Andersen; Katharina M Main; Anna-Maria Andersson; Niels E Skakkebaek; Tina K Jensen
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.756

5.  Predictors of Steroid Hormone Concentrations in Early Pregnancy: Results from a Multi-Center Cohort.

Authors:  Emily S Barrett; Omar Mbowe; Sally W Thurston; Samantha Butts; Christina Wang; Ruby Nguyen; Nicole Bush; J Bruce Redmon; Sukrita Sheshu; Shanna H Swan; Sheela Sathyanarayana
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-03

6.  Anogenital distance in adult women is a strong marker of endometriosis: results of a prospective study with laparoscopic and histological findings.

Authors:  A Crestani; A Arfi; S Ploteau; M Breban; A-S Boudy; S Bendifallah; C Ferrier; E Darai
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-06-06

Review 7.  Endometriosis and polycystic ovary syndrome are diametric disorders.

Authors:  Natalie L Dinsdale; Bernard J Crespi
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  First-Trimester Urinary Bisphenol A Concentration in Relation to Anogenital Distance, an Androgen-Sensitive Measure of Reproductive Development, in Infant Girls.

Authors:  Emily S Barrett; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Omar Mbowe; Sally W Thurston; J Bruce Redmon; Ruby H N Nguyen; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  A short anogenital distance on MRI is a marker of endometriosis.

Authors:  A Crestani; C Abdel Wahab; A Arfi; S Ploteau; K Kolanska; M Breban; S Bendifallah; C Ferrier; E Darai
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-02-17

10.  A Systematic Review of Anogenital Distance and Gynecological Disorders: Endometriosis and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Zhenyan Pan; Fangfang Zhu; Kai Zhou
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.