Literature DB >> 30452659

Anogenital distance is associated with semen quality but not reproductive hormones in 1106 young men from the general population.

L Priskorn1,2, A K Bang1,2, L Nordkap1,2, M Krause1,2, J Mendiola3, T K Jensen1,2,4, A Juul1,2, N E Skakkebaek1,2, S H Swan5, N Jørgensen1,2.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Is anogenital distance (AGD) associated with semen quality and reproductive hormones in men from the general population? SUMMARY ANSWER: Short AGD measured from the anus to the base of scrotum (AGDAS) was associated with reduced sperm counts and morphology but not with sperm motility or reproductive hormones. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: AGD is longer in males than in females. In rodents, AGD is a well-established and sensitive marker of disruption during the masculinization programming window in utero and it has been suggested to be so in humans as well. Therefore, the average AGD would be expected to be shorter in men with poor semen quality, which some studies have confirmed while others have not. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This cross-sectional population-based study was of 1106 men included between 2012 and 2016. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Men from the general Danish population (median age 19 years), unselected with regard to fertility status and semen quality, delivered a semen sample, had a blood sample drawn, which was analyzed for concentrations of reproductive hormones, and answered a comprehensive questionnaire. They also had a physical examination performed including determination of AGD measured as the distance between anus and scrotum (AGDAS) and penis (AGDAP). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI were estimated for a man having abnormal semen parameters according to the World Health Organization's reference values or a low/high concentration of reproductive hormones (defined as the lowest or highest 10%) depending on AGD. AGD was categorized in four strata: ≤10th percentile, 10th-30th percentile, 30th-50th percentile and >50th percentile. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Men with the 10% shortest AGDAS had a more than doubled risk (OR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.40-3.42) of being in the subfertile range for either sperm concentration (<15 million/mL) or sperm morphology (<4%) compared to men with AGDAS above the median (reference). Men in the 10th-30th percentile also had an increased OR of 1.48 (95% CI: 1.06-2.08) but not men in the 30th-50th percentile (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.81-1.62). AGDAP was only weakly related to semen quality. AGD was not associated with testicular volume or any of the reproductive hormones. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Limitations include the potential non-differential misclassification of reproductive outcomes based on a single semen and blood sample and some between-examiner differences in AGD measurements which introduces noise and may result in an underestimation of observed associations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Our study of men from the general population confirmed associations between AGD and semen quality, supporting the hypothesis that AGD in humans could be a marker of fetal testicular development. This suggests that the low semen quality in Danish men may partly be explained by prenatal factors. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study has received financial support from the ReproUnion (L.P.); the Research fund of Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital (N.J.); Grants R01ES016863-04 and R01ES016863-02S4; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences grant (P30ES023515) (S.S.); the European Union (Contract numbers BMH4-CT96-0314, QLK4-CT-1999-01422, QLK4-CT-2002-00603, FP7/2007-2013, DEER Grant agreement no. 212844); the Danish Ministry of Health; the Danish Environmental Protection Agency; A.P. Møller and wife Chastine McKinney Møllers foundation; and Svend Andersens Foundation. None of the funders had any role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of data, writing of the paper or publication decisions. The authors have nothing to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30452659      PMCID: PMC6295959          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  50 in total

1.  Manipulation of pre and postnatal androgen environments and anogenital distance in rats.

Authors:  Diogo H Kita; Katlyn B Meyer; Amanda C Venturelli; Rafaella Adams; Daria L B Machado; Rosana N Morais; Shanna H Swan; Chris Gennings; Anderson J Martino-Andrade
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.221

2.  Shorter anogenital distance correlates with undescended testis: a detailed genital anthropometric analysis in human newborns.

Authors:  Viral G Jain; Arbinder Kumar Singal
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Androgen-mediated development in male rat offspring exposed to flutamide in utero: permanence and correlation of early postnatal changes in anogenital distance and nipple retention with malformations in androgen-dependent tissues.

Authors:  B S McIntyre; N J Barlow; P M Foster
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Anogenital distances in newborns and children from Spain and Greece: predictors, tracking and reliability.

Authors:  Eleni Papadopoulou; Marina Vafeiadi; Silvia Agramunt; Xavier Basagaña; Kleopatra Mathianaki; Polykseni Karakosta; Arianna Spanaki; Antonis Koutis; Leda Chatzi; Martine Vrijheid; Manolis Kogevinas
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.980

5.  Anogenital distance as a phenotypic signature through infancy.

Authors:  Lærke Priskorn; Jørgen H Petersen; Niels Jørgensen; Henriette B Kyhl; Marianne S Andersen; Katharina M Main; Anna-Maria Andersson; Niels E Skakkebaek; Tina K Jensen
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.756

6.  Self-rated health and semen quality among 3,457 young Danish men.

Authors:  Tina K Jensen; Niels Jørgensen; Camilla Asklund; Elisabeth Carlsen; Tage S Kristensen; Mette Holm; Niels Erik Skakkebaek
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Sperm counts may have declined in young university students in Southern Spain.

Authors:  Jaime Mendiola; Niels Jørgensen; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Laura Sarabia-Cos; José J López-Espín; Guillermo Vivero-Salmerón; Karen J Ruiz-Ruiz; Mariana F Fernández; Nicolás Olea; Shanna H Swan; Alberto M Torres-Cantero
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.842

8.  Association of in utero exposure to maternal smoking with reduced semen quality and testis size in adulthood: a cross-sectional study of 1,770 young men from the general population in five European countries.

Authors:  Tina Kold Jensen; Niels Jørgensen; Margus Punab; Trine B Haugen; Jyrki Suominen; Birute Zilaitiene; Antero Horte; Anne-Grethe Andersen; Elisabeth Carlsen; Øystein Magnus; Valentinas Matulevicius; Ingrid Nermoen; Matti Vierula; Niels Keiding; Jorma Toppari; Niels E Skakkebaek
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  East-West gradient in semen quality in the Nordic-Baltic area: a study of men from the general population in Denmark, Norway, Estonia and Finland.

Authors:  Niels Jørgensen; Elisabeth Carlsen; Ingrid Nermoen; Margus Punab; Jyrki Suominen; Anne-Grethe Andersen; Anna-Maria Andersson; Trine B Haugen; Antero Horte; Tina Kold Jensen; Øystein Magnus; Jørgen Holm Petersen; Matti Vierula; Jorma Toppari; Niels E Skakkebaek
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  The relationship between anogenital distance, fatherhood, and fertility in adult men.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Michael H Hsieh; Rustin Chanc Walters; Ross Krasnow; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Anogenital Distance in Healthy Infants: Method-, Age- and Sex-related Reference Ranges.

Authors:  Margit Bistrup Fischer; Marie Lindhardt Ljubicic; Casper P Hagen; Ajay Thankamony; Ken Ong; Ieuan Hughes; Tina Kold Jensen; Katharina M Main; Jørgen Holm Petersen; Alexander S Busch; Emmie N Upners; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Shanna H Swan; Anders Juul
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 2.  REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY: Endocrine disruption and reproductive disorders: impacts on sexually dimorphic neuroendocrine pathways.

Authors:  Heather B Patisaul
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy.

Authors:  Fie Madvig; Marc Künkel Pedersen; Stine Kjaer Urhoj; Elvira Vaclavik Bräuner; Niels Jørgensen; Laerke Priskorn
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 4.  Androgens and the masculinization programming window: human-rodent differences.

Authors:  Richard M Sharpe
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 5.407

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.