Literature DB >> 32574349

Anogenital Distance in Healthy Infants: Method-, Age- and Sex-related Reference Ranges.

Margit Bistrup Fischer1,2, Marie Lindhardt Ljubicic1,2, Casper P Hagen1,2, Ajay Thankamony3, Ken Ong3,4, Ieuan Hughes3, Tina Kold Jensen5,6, Katharina M Main1,2, Jørgen Holm Petersen7, Alexander S Busch1,2, Emmie N Upners1,2, Sheela Sathyanarayana8,9, Shanna H Swan10, Anders Juul1,2.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The use of anogenital distance (AGD) in clinical and epidemiological settings is increasing; however, sex-specific reference data on AGD and data on longitudinal changes in AGD in children is scarce.
OBJECTIVE: To create age-, sex-, and method-related reference ranges of AGD in healthy boys and girls aged 0-24 months, to assess the age-related changes in AGD and to evaluate the 2 predominantly used methods of AGD measurement.
DESIGN: The International AGD consortium comprising 4 centers compiled data from 1 cross-sectional and 3 longitudinal cohort studies (clinicaltrials.gov [NCT02497209]).
SETTING: All data were collected from population-based studies, recruiting from 4 maternity or obstetric centers (United States, Cambridge [United Kingdom], Odense, and Copenhagen [Denmark]).
SUBJECTS: This study included a total of 3705 healthy, mainly Caucasian children aged 0-24 months on whom 7295 measurements were recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: AGDAS (ano-scrotal), AGDAF (ano-fourchette), AGDAP (ano-penile), AGDAC (ano-clitoral), AGD body size indices (weight, body mass index [BMI], body surface area, and length), and intra- and interobserver biases.
RESULTS: We created age-specific reference ranges by centers. We found that AGD increased from birth to 6 months of age and thereafter reached a plateau. Changes in AGD/BMI during the first year of life were minor (0-6% and 0-11% in boys and girls, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Reference ranges for AGD can be used in future epidemiological research and may be utilized clinically to evaluate prenatal androgen action in differences-in-sex-development patients. The increase in AGD during the first year of life was age-related, while AGD/BMI was fairly stable. The TIDES and Cambridge methods were equally reproducible. © Endocrine Society 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anogenital distance; disorders of sexual development; endocrine disrupting chemicals; reference ranges

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32574349      PMCID: PMC7368455          DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  38 in total

Review 1.  Clinical review: Anogenital distance or digit length ratio as measures of fetal androgen exposure: relationship to male reproductive development and its disorders.

Authors:  Afshan Dean; Richard M Sharpe
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Anogenital distance and penile width measurements in The Infant Development and the Environment Study (TIDES): methods and predictors.

Authors:  Sheela Sathyanarayana; Richard Grady; J B Redmon; Kristy Ivicek; Emily Barrett; Sarah Janssen; Ruby Nguyen; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 1.830

3.  Maternal use of mild analgesics during pregnancy associated with reduced anogenital distance in sons: a cohort study of 1027 mother-child pairs.

Authors:  Dorte Vesterholm Lind; Katharina M Main; Henriette Boye Kyhl; David Møbjerg Kristensen; Jorma Toppari; Helle Raun Andersen; Marianne Skovsager Andersen; Niels E Skakkebæk; Tina Kold Jensen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Shorter anogenital distance correlates with undescended testis: a detailed genital anthropometric analysis in human newborns.

Authors:  Viral G Jain; Arbinder Kumar Singal
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Anogenital distance is determined during early gestation in humans.

Authors:  Viral G Jain; Vaibhav Goyal; Vikas Chowdhary; Namita Swarup; Ravinder J Singh; Arbinder Singal; Prem Shekhawat
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Anogenital distances in newborns and children from Spain and Greece: predictors, tracking and reliability.

Authors:  Eleni Papadopoulou; Marina Vafeiadi; Silvia Agramunt; Xavier Basagaña; Kleopatra Mathianaki; Polykseni Karakosta; Arianna Spanaki; Antonis Koutis; Leda Chatzi; Martine Vrijheid; Manolis Kogevinas
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 7.  Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: foetal origin of adult reproductive problems.

Authors:  Christine Wohlfahrt-Veje; Katharina M Main; Niels Erik Skakkebaek
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 3.478

8.  Prenatal phthalate exposures and anogenital distance in Swedish boys.

Authors:  Carl-Gustaf Bornehag; Fredrik Carlstedt; Bo A G Jönsson; Christian H Lindh; Tina K Jensen; Anna Bodin; Carin Jonsson; Staffan Janson; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Gestational exposure to an epidemiologically defined mixture of phthalates leads to gonadal dysfunction in mouse offspring of both sexes.

Authors:  Anastasia Repouskou; Emily Panagiotidou; Lydia Panagopoulou; Pernilla Larsdotter Bisting; Astrud R Tuck; Marcus O D Sjödin; Johan Lindberg; Evangelos Bozas; Joëlle Rüegg; Chris Gennings; Carl-Gustaf Bornehag; Pauliina Damdimopoulou; Antonios Stamatakis; Efthymia Kitraki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Anogenital distance from birth to 2 years: a population study.

Authors:  Ajay Thankamony; Ken K Ong; David B Dunger; Carlo L Acerini; Ieuan A Hughes
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Azole Fungicides and Their Endocrine Disrupting Properties: Perspectives on Sex Hormone-Dependent Reproductive Development.

Authors:  Monica Kam Draskau; Terje Svingen
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-28

2.  Sex-specific ranges and ratios for anogenital distance among Thai full-term newborns.

Authors:  Nattakarn Numsriskulrat; Khomsak Srilanchakon; Chaiyat Pronprechatham; Sopon Pornkunwilai; Vichit Supornsilchai
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.567

Review 3.  Using Experimental Models to Decipher the Effects of Acetaminophen and NSAIDs on Reproductive Development and Health.

Authors:  Brigitte Boizet-Bonhoure; Stéphanie Déjardin; Moïra Rossitto; Francis Poulat; Pascal Philibert
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-08

Review 4.  Androgens and the masculinization programming window: human-rodent differences.

Authors:  Richard M Sharpe
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 5.407

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.